Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad

Caso Falls Church General Hospital, Monografías, Ensayos de Introducción a Ingeniería Software

Este es un caso realista aplicado en la vida real de una situación real

Tipo: Monografías, Ensayos

2022/2023

Subido el 16/10/2023

alejandro-olimn-madrigal
alejandro-olimn-madrigal 🇲🇽

2 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Academia de Operaciones
Sistemas de Calidad
Dr. Miguel Angel Moreno Miguez
Falls Church General Hospital
Founded in 1968, the Falls Church General Hospital (FCGH) is a privately-owned 6l5-patient bed
facility in the incorporated township of Falls Church, Virginia. Falls Church is four miles from downtown
Washington, D.C., and is surrounded by the counties of Arlington, Fairfax, and Alexandria, Virginia, all
affluent urban/suburban communities with a highly-educated population composed largely of
employees of the U.S. government and high-tech engineering firms. Falls Church General Hospital,
with 895 employees, provides a broad range of healthcare services, including drug/alcohol abuse
wards, emergency rooms, x-ray and laboratory facilities, maternity wards, intensive- and cardiac-
care units, and outpatient facilities. In January 1990, the hospital began a series of ads in The
Washington Post highlighting its concerned doctors and nurses, its friendly support staff, and its overall
philosophy that its employees care about their work and their patients.
The Issue of Assessing Quality Healthcare
Quality healthcare is a goal all hospitals profess, but few have developed comprehensive and
scientific means of asking customers to judge the quality of care they receive. A tremendous amount
of effort has been devoted to assessing the clinical quality of hospital care; books, journals, and
papers on the topic abound. The problem, however, is that past efforts to measure hospital quality
have largely ignored the perceptions of customers--the patients, physicians, and payers. Instead of
formally considering customer judgments of quality, the healthcare industry has focused almost
entirely on internal quality assessments made by the health professionals who operate the system. In
effect, a system for improving healthcare has been created that all but ignores the voice of the
customer.
The board of FCGH believes that all hospitals need to make the transformation from the current
practice of attempting to ensure quality to measuring and improving the quality of care from both the
external, customer perspective and the internal, provider perspective. Fueled by concerns in recent
years about costs and medical practice variation and by the demand for greater social
accountability, there is an emerging demand by patients and payers that quality healthcare be
provided at best value.
As board president, Dr. Irwin Greenberg recently stated at the annual FCGH meeting
"As the prices people pay in the future for given levels of service become more
similar, hospitals will be distinguished largely on the basis of their quality and
value as assessed by customers. We must have accurate information about
how our customers, not just the healthcare professionals who work here, judge
the quality of care in this institution. Many hospitals already have some
methods for measuring patient satisfaction. A recent survey of more than two
hundred hospitals showed that two-thirds routinely conduct patient satisfaction
surveys. Typically, the surveys are distributed at discharge to patients who are
free to respond or not. The main value of such surveys is to gain quick
knowledge of problems experienced by patients, many of whom often fill out
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Caso Falls Church General Hospital y más Monografías, Ensayos en PDF de Introducción a Ingeniería Software solo en Docsity!

Sistemas de Calidad Dr. Miguel Angel Moreno Miguez

Falls Church General Hospital

Founded in 1968, the Falls Church General Hospital (FCGH) is a privately-owned 6l5-patient bed facility in the incorporated township of Falls Church, Virginia. Falls Church is four miles from downtown Washington, D.C., and is surrounded by the counties of Arlington, Fairfax, and Alexandria, Virginia, all affluent urban/suburban communities with a highly-educated population composed largely of employees of the U.S. government and high-tech engineering firms. Falls Church General Hospital, with 895 employees, provides a broad range of healthcare services, including drug/alcohol abuse wards, emergency rooms, x-ray and laboratory facilities, maternity wards, intensive- and cardiac- care units, and outpatient facilities. In January 1990, the hospital began a series of ads in The Washington Post highlighting its concerned doctors and nurses, its friendly support staff, and its overall philosophy that its employees care about their work and their patients. The Issue of Assessing Quality Healthcare Quality healthcare is a goal all hospitals profess, but few have developed comprehensive and scientific means of asking customers to judge the quality of care they receive. A tremendous amount of effort has been devoted to assessing the clinical quality of hospital care; books, journals, and papers on the topic abound. The problem, however, is that past efforts to measure hospital quality have largely ignored the perceptions of customers--the patients, physicians, and payers. Instead of formally considering customer judgments of quality, the healthcare industry has focused almost entirely on internal quality assessments made by the health professionals who operate the system. In effect, a system for improving healthcare has been created that all but ignores the voice of the customer. The board of FCGH believes that all hospitals need to make the transformation from the current practice of attempting to ensure quality to measuring and improving the quality of care from both the external, customer perspective and the internal, provider perspective. Fueled by concerns in recent years about costs and medical practice variation and by the demand for greater social accountability, there is an emerging demand by patients and payers that quality healthcare be provided at best value. As board president, Dr. Irwin Greenberg recently stated at the annual FCGH meeting

"As the prices people pay in the future for given levels of service become more

similar, hospitals will be distinguished largely on the basis of their quality and

value as assessed by customers. We must have accurate information about

how our customers, not just the healthcare professionals who work here, judge

the quality of care in this institution. Many hospitals already have some

methods for measuring patient satisfaction. A recent survey of more than two

hundred hospitals showed that two-thirds routinely conduct patient satisfaction

surveys. Typically, the surveys are distributed at discharge to patients who are

free to respond or not. The main value of such surveys is to gain quick

knowledge of problems experienced by patients, many of whom often fill out

Sistemas de Calidad Dr. Miguel Angel Moreno Miguez

questionnaires because they are disgruntled about some specific aspect of

the care they received."

In response to Dr. Greenberg's statement, and in light of the advertising campaign, hospital administrator Carla Kimball called a meeting of her department heads to discuss the issue of quality. "Can we really deliver on our promises? Or are we in danger of failing to live up to the level of healthcare our patients expect, and do we risk losing them?" Ms. Kimball asked. Annie Kerr, head of nursing, continued the debate

"I agree that surveys, such as the one Dr. Greenberg mentioned in his speech,

are valuable. But how do we measure the quality of our healthcare? Some

patients who leave FCGH happy may have actually received poor treatment

here. If we are serious about improving the quality of care, we need more

valid and reliable data on which to act. We need answers to specific, quality-

related questions about activities in areas that affect patients--admission,

nursing, medical staff, daily care, and ancillary staff."

"I have an idea," said Merrill Warkentin, Kimball's staff director. "I just finished

reading a book by John Groocock. He's the Vice-President for Quality at TRW,

a big manufacturer. He says there are 14 steps in TRW's internal quality audits. I

made a photocopy of those steps (see Table 1). Why don't we consider his

approach?"

When the meeting ended, Ms. Kimball read Groocock's list again and began to think about the whole issue of quality control in U.S. firms. It had worked in many manufacturing companies, but could the concepts of quality control really be used in a hospital? TABLE 1: Steps in TRW's Quality Audit

  1. Quality to the customer. Is conformance of the product to established quality standards measured? Is quality of the organization's product compared with that of competitors' products?
  2. Quality costs. Have the costs of quality been measured and have areas for possible cost savings been identified?
  3. Design review. Do procedures exist to review designs for quality? Are these procedures being carried out?
  4. Product qualification. Have procedures been established and followed to qualify new products before any deliveries to customers?
  5. Product liability. Has each product been scrutinized regarding safety and are appropriate records kept? Does a written plan exist for dealing with a major product liability problem?
  6. Process capability. Has the capability of all processes been measured and is that information used in product design and development?
  7. Incoming inspection. Are incoming lots inspected in an efficient manner and are appropriate records kept?