

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A summary of transformational grammar, a linguistic theory developed by noam chomsky. Transformational grammar posits that sentences are generated by subconscious procedures or rules, which can be thought of as transformations of basic structures. The key concepts of generative grammar, including kernel sentences, transformations, and the distinction between lexical and formal transformations. It also discusses the limitations of transformational analysis in handling certain linguistic constructions, such as compounds, and the need for a separate level of analysis for these phenomena. The document offers insights into the generative power of language and the underlying cognitive processes involved in sentence formation, making it a valuable resource for students and researchers interested in linguistics and language theory.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Lia Aftanty / 21202241042 / PBI B Summary of Transformational Grammar We called tranformational grammar because we can create an infinite number of sentences that we’ve never seen or heard before with a finite set of words and rules. Sentences are generated by subconscious procedures or rules. These procedures are thought of as transformations of basic structures. That’s why generative grammar is also called transformational grammar or transformational generative grammar. A. Generative Grammar Sentences are generated by subconscious procedures or rules. These procedures are thought of as transformations of basic structures. That’s why generative grammar is also called transformational grammar or transformational generative grammar. Chomsky argued that the methods which were being used to describe languages on the syntactic level were inadequate (or at least intolerably clumsy), and proposed a new grammatical model to replace them. By Harris, this model had been called as a transformation. According to Harris, two sentences which are of a quite different pattern can be transformationally related if the same lexical items co-occur in both. For examples:
interesting to know why Lees has decided that such-and-such a construction should be handled in the kernel and such-and-such in the transformational section. This is particularly so as at first sight there seem to be some inconsistencies. Example by Sub Sequent Rule: John’s there in the garden There are two alternatives:
B. Inter Alia To develop this further we could return to the notion of predictability used earlier to handle sentences with Loc and Acc. That, for instance, the stone's ready to drink is collocationally abnormal can be predicted from the abnormality of John drank the stone, and that the sigh is ready to utter is so from the sigh is ready. Furthermore, it is sometimes necessary to distinguish classes of collocations which are relevant on the transformational level alone. Consider the following transformations:
front brake of the bicycle. C. Stage of Analysis Produces