Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Sputtering - Thin Film Materials Processing - Lecture Slides, Slides of Material Engineering

These are the Lecture Slides of Thin Film Materials Processing which includes Vaporization, Vapor Pressure Curves, Thermal Desorption, Molecular Binding Energy, First Order Desorption, Desorption Rate, Real Surfaces, Diffusion of Gas Particles etc. Key important points are: Sputtering, Ion-Solid Interactions, Ion-Solid Impact, Sputter Yield, Sputtering Regimes, Linear Cascade Model, Sigmund Theory, Binding Energy, Sputtering Alloys, Sputtering Energy Distribution

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 03/21/2013

dheer
dheer 🇮🇳

4.3

(20)

95 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Sputtering
Page 1
Sputtering
Page 2
Ion-Solid Interactions
Sticking probability versus ion energy
Thermal energies -- ~<0.02 eV unity sticking
coefficient (physi and chemisorption)
–10
-2-20 eV sticking probability decreases
reaching a minimum at ~ 20eV
20-104eV the sticking coefficient increases
and approaches 1 again.
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Sputtering - Thin Film Materials Processing - Lecture Slides and more Slides Material Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

Page 1

Sputtering

Page 2

Ion-Solid Interactions

• Sticking probability versus ion energy

  • Thermal energies -- ~<0.02 eV unity sticking

coefficient (physi and chemisorption)

  • 10 -2^ -20 eV sticking probability decreases

reaching a minimum at ~ 20eV

  • 20-10 4 eV the sticking coefficient increases

and approaches 1 again.

Page 3

Ion-Solid Impact

  • Initially when the ion is a few Angstroms away there are electron exchange processes occuring (on the time scale of 10 -15^ s).
  • Ions capture electrons from the solid (IP of the ion > work function of the solid) thus the ionic species become neutralized
  • As the distance further decreases: the gas atom (ie the ion) and the solid atom form a quasi-molecular species. (atomic orbitals begin to overlap and form an unstable species)
  • Further decreases in the distance: electron-electron repulsion and the Pauli exclusion principle start to dominate which results in separation and collisional re-ionization of the neutrals (IMPACT).
  • Reflection: as θ approaches 0 and M2 >> M

Sputtering

Page 4

Sputter Yield

• S = number of ejected (sputtered) target

species/incident particle

  • Is a function of:
    • M1 and M
    • Binding Energy
    • Incident Angle
    • Nuclear stopping power
    • Incident Particle Energy

Page 7

Sigmund Theory

Usisthebindingenergyofthetargetions

Eisincidention energy

M2isthemassofthetarget

M1istheMassoftheion

butoftenhasavalueof0.2-0.

incidentangle0.1 1.

isafunctionof M(target)/M(ion)and

2 1 2

2

1 2

α

α

π

α

where

M M U

MM E

S

S

Good for low energy (<1keV)

Sputtering

Page 8

Binding Energy

Us – typcially assumed to be the heat of sublimation (2-5eV)

For Sputtering, typical threshold energies are ~ 4xUs

See sputtering yield plots and note the different regimes

Threshold, ~ linear, and the implantation…

Page 9

Sigmund Theory – High Energy

volume(atoms/volume)

:

1 dz

( ) isthenuclearstoppingpower dE

:

  1. 42 ( )/

N atomic

where

N

S E

where

S S E U

n

n S

=

= =

= α

been tabul ated)

'( )isthereducednuclearcross-section(whichhave

electronsduringthecollision(~0.1-0.2Angstroms)

thenuclearchargeisscreenedby the

aistheeffectiveradiusover which

Zistheatomicnumber

where:

4 '( ) 1 2

12 2 1

s E

M M S aZZqMs E

n

n n = π +

Sputtering

Page 10

Sputtering Alloys

Target AB n = nA +nB

CA = nA/n CB = nB/n

Initial Flux Ratio

atomsimpinging on target

n numberofgas

C concentration

S sputteryield

flux

g =

=

=

=

=

atom

nS C

nS C g B B

g A A B

A

ψ

ψ

ψ

Modified Surface Concentration

C n S n

C n S n C

C

B g B

A g A B

A

S C n S n

S C n S n

S C

S C

B B g B

A A g A B B

A A B

A

Steady State Target composition (^) B A

A B B

A

C S

C S

C

C

B

A B

A

C

C

and

Steady State Flux

Page 13

DC Sputtering

• Pressure effects

  • < ~ 10mTorr electron mean free path too large

and not enough ions strike the target for

efficient secondary electron generation

  • Increasing pressure increases ionization and

the plasma current

  • As pressure increases plasma current increases
  • As pressure increases ion scattering increases
  • ~100 mTorr optimum

Sputtering

Page 14

DC Sputtering

Eistheaveragesputteringenergy

eistheTownsendsecondaryelectroncoef.

istheatomicdensity

gisthecathode-anodegapdistance

atomstravelbeforetheybecomethermalized

xth isthemeandistancethesputtered

Pd dischargepowerdensity(W/cm2)

where

( 1 )

γ

ρ

ρ γ

< >

=

≈ < >  

  

g E

P x s

G cm e

& d th

Page 15

Triode Sputtering

• Add a thermionic or cold cathode source to

inject electrons into plasma to increase the

plasma density

Anode +50-100V

Target

-V

Substrate Holder Disadvantage is plasma non-uniformity over the target

Sputtering

Page 16

Bias Sputtering

• Impose a small (50-300V) bias on the

substrate to create a flux of low energy ions

  • Improved film adhesion
  • Improved step coverage
  • Increased film density
  • Decreased resistivity in metals
  • Change in hardness and residual stress
  • Improved Optical reflectivity
  • Improved dielectric strength

Page 19

AC Sputtering

4

(^34)

( )

electrodesheath ( )

Assumingthesamecurrentdensityateach

dsisthesheath thickness

Cisthecapacitance( A/d)

where

( )

( )



 

 ∴ =



 

=

 

  

= = 

rf

G

G

rf s

s

s

s rf

G rf

G G

rf

A

A VG

Vrf

V

V d G

d rf

d G

d rf A

A C

C V

V

ε

A(rf)

A(G)

Tie the substrate holder and the rest of the chamber together as the grounded electrode to maximize A(G)

V(ac)

Sputtering

Page 20

Reactive Sputtering

• Many oxides, nitride, carbide, sulfides…

can be sputtered from ceramic targets

however the binding energy (Us) is

typically large so the sputter yield is low –

low throughput!

• Solution – Reactive sputtering – sputter

from metallic cation target and flow a

reactive gas containing the relevant anion

Page 21

Reactive Sputtering

  • Assumptions:
    • Elemental target has a sputter yeild Sm
    • Target sputtering is due only to inert working gas
    • Compounds sputtered from the target with a sputter yield Sc deposit as molecules
    • A uniform ion current density (j) flows over the target area A(t)
    • The collecting substrate surface area is A(s)
    • The fraction of the target area covered by the compound is θt
    • The fraction of target un-reacted metal is 1-θt
    • The fraction of the substrate area covered by the compound is θs
    • The fraction of substrate un-reacted metal is 1-θs
    • The flux of reactive gas flux (φr) is proportional to the partial pressure throuh =1/4 nv(avg)
    • Reactive gas molecules do not stick to compound but stick to metal target with a sticking coefficient of αt

Sputtering

Page 22

Reactive Sputtering

( )

formedbyonereactivegas molecule

aisthenumberofcompoundmolecules

qistheelectronchargeand

where

Φ r α t ( 1 −θ t ) Ata = j / q θ tAtSc

Target Steady State Compound Film Formation Rate

Total Target Erosion Rate

Rt =( j / q ) [ Sc θ t + Sm ( 1 − θ t )] At

Substrate Mass Balance

[ ] [ ]

Once iscalculatedfromabove canbe determined

therighthandtermisthemetalsputteredfromthetarget

2.isduetoreactionofthismetalwiththereactivegas

fromthetargetontothemetalfractionofthesubstrateand

rateonthesubstrate;1.duetosputterdepositionofthecompoundfrom

termsontheleftreflect thetwocontributionstocompoundformation

bisthenumberofmetalatomsinthecompound

where:

( / ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) (/ ) ( 1 ) /

θt θs

j qSc θ (^) tAt −θ sr α s −θ sAsb = jq Sm −θ tAt θ sb