






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An overview of research ethics, focusing on the importance of minimizing bias and protecting participants in social research. It discusses the concept of research bias, the role of objectivity, and general guidelines for minimizing bias. The document also explores ethical dilemmas in social research, using examples from laud humphrey's study of male homosexual encounters and milgram's obedience experiment. It concludes by discussing the importance of balancing the need for knowledge with the need to protect participants and outlines basic ethical guidelines.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 10
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Accurate generalizations require us to minimize the impact of bias.
Bias is anything that can lead us to a particular interpretation or conclusion.
Research bias is the d istortion of results so they reflect personal bias.
If objectivity is impossible, should we pursue “advocacy research”? We run the risk of social research becoming propaganda or advertising!
Total objectivity may be unattainable..but we can still strive to be as objective as possible.
As sociological methods have become more powerful, concerns over ethics have mounted.
Research involves both scientific issues & ethical issues.
Ethical issues arise from: (1) problems being studied, (2) research setting, (3) procedures, (4) participants, (5) type of data being collected.
The experiment brought 2 people together in a lab for a study on “learning”. Each real subject (“teacher”) was paired with a confederate of Milgram… a “learner” who was really a professional actor. Subject-teachers & confederate-learners were put in separate rooms. Following Milgram’s instructions, subject-teachers administered an escalating set of “electric shocks” to confederate-learners whenever the latter made an error. Up to 2/3 of the subject-teachers obeyed Milgram and administered the maximum “electric shock”, ostensibly 450 volts , to the confederate-learners!!
Milgram’s subjects experienced anxiety, distress, seizures, uncontrollable giggling…and guilt once they found out what was really going on. Milgram’s research helps explain why atrocities can occur. His research also highlighted major ethical concerns on issues of informed consent, deception, and distress or harm to subjects.
Zimbardo’s research on how social context and roles can create abusive (and submissive) behavior added to the knowledge gained from Milgram, and raised similar ethical issues!
1. Informed consent; Reasonably informed consent (explain major goals & procedures, describe benefits / costs, explain how respondent was chosen, answer questions, emphasize participation is voluntary). 2. Confidentiality & Anonymity (once field work is finished destroy all identifying information; data sets securely stored & contain no identifying information; publish results in aggregate or use pseudonyms). 3. Avoid placing undue pressure on participants. 4. Minimize the costs of participation.