Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Designing Effective Questionnaires: Types, Formats, and Best Practices, Slides of Research Methodology

An in-depth exploration of various question types, including open-ended and closed-ended questions, dichotomous questions, and questions based on level of measurement. It also covers important considerations such as question placement, wording, and response bias. Use this guide to create well-designed questionnaires for research or surveys.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 08/31/2013

dewansh
dewansh 🇮🇳

4.4

(10)

92 documents

1 / 27

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Developing a Questionnaire
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b

Partial preview of the text

Download Designing Effective Questionnaires: Types, Formats, and Best Practices and more Slides Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

Developing a Questionnaire

Types of Questions

  • Open-ended
    • high validity, low manipulative quality
  • Closed-ended
    • low validity, high manipulative quality

Closed-ended

  • A closed-ended question is one in which you

provide the response categories, and the

respondent just chooses one:

What do you like best about your job? (a) The people (b) The diversity of skills you need to do it (c) The pay and/or benefits (d) Other: ______________________________

Dichotomous Questions

  • Dichotomous Question: a question that has

two possible responses

  • Could be
    • Yes/No
    • True/False
    • Agree/Disagree

Interval Level

  • Attempt to measure on an interval level
    • Likert response scale : ask an opinion question on a 1-to-5, 1-to-7, etc. bipolar scale - Bipolar: has a neutral point and scale ends are at opposite positions of the opinion
    • Semantic differential: an object is assessed by the respondent on a set of bipolar adjective pairs
    • Guttman scale: respondent checks each item with which they agree; constructed as cumulative, so if you agree to one, you probably agree to all of the ones above it in the list

Filter/Contingency Questions

  • To determine if a respondent is ‘qualified’ to answer questions, might need a filter or contingency question (also known as knowledge) - Limit # of jumps - If only two levels, use graphic to jump - If you can't fit the response to a filter on a single page, it's probably best to be send them to a page, rather than a question #

Should there be a middle category?

  • Does it make sense to offer it?
  • Should not be used as the “don’t know or no

opinion” option.

  • The middle option is usually placed between the positive and negative responses.
  • Sometimes it’s last in an interview.

Direct Magnitude Scaling

  • Method of obtaining ratio-scaled data
    • Idea is to give respondents an anchor point, and then ask them to answer questions relative to that
  • Example:
    • Suppose you are interested in the severity of crimes. - Begin by assigning a number to one crime and then have respondents assign numbers to the others based upon a ratio.

Question Placement

  • It's a good idea to put difficult, embarrassing or threatening questions towards the end - More likely to answer. - If they get mad and quit, at least you've gotten most of your questions asked!
  • Put related questions together to avoid giving the impression of lack of meticulousness
  • Watch out for questions that influence the answers to other questions.

Wording of Questions

  • Direction of Statements
    • Response bias
    • Socially desirable
  • Always and never
    • Avoid this
    • Better to phrase as ‘most’, ‘infrequently’
  • Language
    • Reflect educational level and reading ability
    • Need for various languages

Mutually Exclusive and Exhaustive

  • Mutually exclusive : not possible to select

more than one category/value

  • Exhaustive : providing all possible

categories/values

Forced Choice

  • Choose between 2 choices
    • Might not be relevant
    • Other choices exist (or at least possible)
    • Lesser of two evils

Response Bias

  • Exaggerating the truth
  • Socially desirable answers
  • Consider using ‘trap’ questions
    • Possibly fictional choice

Sensitive Items

  • More comfortable answering in categories
    • Minimize missing data
    • Might loose statistical power