Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Monash University Torts LAW1113 Exam Notes: Private Nuisance, Negligence, and Remedies, Exams of Remedies

Exam notes for the monash university law1113 torts course in semester 2, 2017. The notes cover private nuisance, including the legal test for standing to sue, who can be sued, and the unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land. The document also discusses negligence, the duty of care, and remedies for torts, including damages and injunctions.

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

arwen
arwen 🇬🇧

4.3

(10)

249 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Torts LAW1113 Monash University S2 2017
Torts 1113 Exam Notes Sample
Private nuisance
An unreasonable interference with the P’s use and enjoyment of the land
Standing to sue
In order to sue, the P must be in exclusive possession of land
PI with exclusive right to possession of land
-owner
-tenant (in possession)
-reversioner (if the nuisance would affect the reversioner’s interest)
-mere licesnsee is not enough (Hunter v Canary Wharf; Oldham v
Lawson)You need to show you have a legal interest, an exclusive right to
the possession of land
Who can be sued
A person is held liable if he bears some degree of personal responsibility
1. The creator, or person who authorised the creation of the
nuisance (Fennell v Robson Excavations Pty Ltd)
2. Occupier of the land who adopts a nuisance (Senleigh- Denfield v
O’Callaghan)
Court found they adopted the drainage system of the land for
their benefit and that caused a nuisance.
Adopting = actively using it
3. Continuing a nuisance
Can be passive when continuing a nuisance
if occupier knew of it or ought to have known, or they failed to
take reasonable steps to end it
(Hargrave v Goldman)
Unreasonable
interference with the
land
Material injury to property- physical interference test which says
“if it’s not trivial, it is unreasonable” (St Helen’s Smelting Co.)
Damage to sensibilities-
test: “Inconvenience materially interfering with the ordinary
comfort physically of human existence, not merely according to
dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober
and simple notions among the English people (Walter v Selfe)
a. extent (duration/time/frequency) (Clarey; Seidler v Luna Park)
b. locality (Munro v Southern Dairies)
c. Sensitivity of the plaintiff (robinson v Kilvert)
d. Improper motive (Hollywood Silver Fox Farm)
e. Live and let live/ ordinary noises not bad
(Clarey)
Freedom from view
Courts do not protect uninterrupted views (Hunter v Canary)
Being observed in the use of one’s premises is not a nuisance (Victoria
Park Racing v Taylor)
Defences
Statutory Authority (Laster-Traversz)
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Monash University Torts LAW1113 Exam Notes: Private Nuisance, Negligence, and Remedies and more Exams Remedies in PDF only on Docsity!

Torts 1113 Exam Notes Sample

Private nuisance

An unreasonable interference with the P’s use and enjoyment of the land Standing to sue In order to sue, the P must be in exclusive possession of land PI with exclusive right to possession of land

  • owner
  • tenant (in possession)
  • reversioner (if the nuisance would affect the reversioner’s interest)
  • mere licesnsee is not enough (Hunter v Canary Wharf; Oldham v Lawson)You need to show you have a legal interest, an exclusive right to the possession of land Who can be sued A person is held liable if he bears some degree of personal responsibility
  1. The creator, or person who authorised the creation of the nuisance (Fennell v Robson Excavations Pty Ltd)
  2. Occupier of the land who adopts a nuisance (Senleigh- Denfield v O’Callaghan) Court found they adopted the drainage system of the land for their benefit and that caused a nuisance. Adopting = actively using it
  3. Continuing a nuisance Can be passive when continuing a nuisance if occupier knew of it or ought to have known, or they failed to take reasonable steps to end it (Hargrave v Goldman) Unreasonable interference with the land
  • Material injury to property- physical interference test which says “if it’s not trivial, it is unreasonable” (St Helen’s Smelting Co.)
  • Damage to sensibilities- test: “Inconvenience materially interfering with the ordinary comfort physically of human existence, not merely according to dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people (Walter v Selfe) a. extent (duration/time/frequency) (Clarey; Seidler v Luna Park) b. locality (Munro v Southern Dairies) c. Sensitivity of the plaintiff (robinson v Kilvert) d. Improper motive (Hollywood Silver Fox Farm) e. Live and let live/ ordinary noises not bad (Clarey) Freedom from view Courts do not protect uninterrupted views (Hunter v Canary) Being observed in the use of one’s premises is not a nuisance (Victoria Park Racing v Taylor) Defences • Statutory Authority (Laster-Traversz)

Legal test: 1. Language used by the legislator must be mandatory, must mandate you to do something

  1. Nuisance has to be an inevitable consequence of the act, no other way you can comply with the legislation
    • Not a defence: Coming to the nuisance (Miller v Jackson) Remedies (^) • Damages:
  • Compensatory- but only if the damage was reasonably foreseeable (Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather)
  • Exemplary- if D needs to be made an example of for ‘highhanded behaviour’ Reasonably foreseeable at the time the nuisance was created (can only get an injunction, not damages, if this not fulfilled)
  • Injunctions
  • Discretionary: (miller v Jackson) injunction denied on balance of interests
  • (kennaway v Thompson) public interest prevailed over the disturbance caused
  • (Coventry v Lawrence) Factors to consider when deciding an injunction/damages:
  • where the injury to the claimant’s legal right is small
  • where the injury to the claimant can be adequately compensated by a small money payment
  • where the case is one which would be oppressive to the D to grant an injunction
  • where the injury to the claimant is capable of being estimated in money
  • Self-help/abatement Taking action yourself, as long as use of force is not unreasonable