Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Political Islam in Middle East, Assignments of History of Middle East

Political Islam in Middle East

Typology: Assignments

2019/2020

Uploaded on 05/12/2020

adelia_khairutdinova
adelia_khairutdinova 🇹🇷

5 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
2.Is "Political Islam" a national or a global phenomenon? Why?
The rise of Islamism is, paradoxically, both a product and a rejection of modernity.Islamism,
evidently, is itself an important point of contention; indeed, much the same can be said of
“modernity”
Political Islam is a form of instrumentalization of Islam by individuals,groups and
organizations that pursue political objectives.It provides political responses to today's societal
challenges by imagining a future,the foundations for which rest on reappropriated,reinvented
concepts borrowed from the Islamic Tradition. The reappropriation of the past,the invention
of tradition inter sofa romanticized notion of a largely mythical golden age, lies at the heart of
this instrumentalization of Islam.
Clearly, then, political Islam comes in various shapes and sizes; it may, in fact, be more
accurate to refer to this phenomenon in the plural, as ‘political Islams’. So why many outside
observers perceive political Islam to be a monolithic phenomenon. The answer lies in part in
the use of a common vocabulary by a diverse set of Islamists and in part in their similar
attitude towards the international power structure. The similarity in vocabulary can be
explained primarily with reference to the domestic political systems within which most
Islamist groups operate and which they wish to change. The similarity in their attitude
towards the international distribution of power can be explained principally by the impact of
the international power structure on Muslim societies and on causes that are perceived as
‘Muslim’ by the large majority of Muslims around the world.
Constructivists view Islamism no tas a reified set of social and cultural norms, but as a
discourse – a network of language, symbols, assumptions and actions that both constitute and
are constituted by social reality.
First,Islamism, as far as its exponents and adherents are concerned,is above all a political
ideology and not a theological construct.Its main attraction for its followers lies not in the fact
that it offers them spiritual solace,but in it supposed capacity to provide answers to their
contemporary political and social predicaments.It is a product of modernity as much as a
response to it.
Second, despite its ahistorical and acontextual construction of a romanticized golden age,
Islamism in practice is a prisoner of context, especially that provided by the existence of
multiple sovereign states. There are almost as many varieties of political Islam as there are
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Political Islam in Middle East and more Assignments History of Middle East in PDF only on Docsity!

2.Is "Political Islam" a national or a global phenomenon? Why?

The rise of Islamism is, paradoxically, both a product and a rejection of modernity.Islamism, evidently, is itself an important point of contention; indeed, much the same can be said of “modernity” Political Islam is a form of instrumentalization of Islam by individuals,groups and organizations that pursue political objectives.It provides political responses to today's societal challenges by imagining a future,the foundations for which rest on reappropriated,reinvented concepts borrowed from the Islamic Tradition. The reappropriation of the past,the invention of tradition inter sofa romanticized notion of a largely mythical golden age, lies at the heart of this instrumentalization of Islam. Clearly, then, political Islam comes in various shapes and sizes; it may, in fact, be more accurate to refer to this phenomenon in the plural, as ‘political Islams’. So why many outside observers perceive political Islam to be a monolithic phenomenon. The answer lies in part in the use of a common vocabulary by a diverse set of Islamists and in part in their similar attitude towards the international power structure. The similarity in vocabulary can be explained primarily with reference to the domestic political systems within which most Islamist groups operate and which they wish to change. The similarity in their attitude towards the international distribution of power can be explained principally by the impact of the international power structure on Muslim societies and on causes that are perceived as ‘Muslim’ by the large majority of Muslims around the world. Constructivists view Islamism no tas a reified set of social and cultural norms, but as a discourse – a network of language, symbols, assumptions and actions that both constitute and are constituted by social reality. First,Islamism, as far as its exponents and adherents are concerned,is above all a political ideology and not a theological construct.Its main attraction for its followers lies not in the fact that it offers them spiritual solace,but in it supposed capacity to provide answers to their contemporary political and social predicaments.It is a product of modernity as much as a response to it. Second, despite its ahistorical and acontextual construction of a romanticized golden age, Islamism in practice is a prisoner of context, especially that provided by the existence of multiple sovereign states. There are almost as many varieties of political Islam as there are

states that are predominantly Muslim. In fact, the number of Islamisms possibly exceeds the number of Muslim majority states because several ‘Muslim’ secessionist movements, such as those in Chechnya or Kashmir, which operate within and against predominantly non-Muslim states, also espouse ideologies that fall within the category of political Islam. The primary reason why such struggles are appropriated by Islamists is related to the failure of secular movements and ideologies to fulfil the political aspirations of Muslim ethnic groups struggling for autonomy or independence. The repression exercised by predominantly non-Muslim regimes when faced with demands for autonomy or attempts at secession has also helped crystallize the Muslim identity of those engaged in such struggles. However, these are basically nationalist movements, albeit in Islamic garb, and their primary objective is the creation of independent states.? The same applies to factions of national liberation movements, such as those in Palestine and Lebanon, that have taken on an Islamic complexion. Hamas and Hezbollah are as much creations of their national context as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Jama’at-i-Islami in Pakistan. The nature of the political systems and regimes prevailing in many Muslim countries has had, continues to have and is likely to go on having a significant impact on the growth of political Islam and the strategies adopted by Islamists in these countries. Closed political systems and authoritarian regimes are highly conducive to growth in the popularity of Islamist political formations and the Islamist ideology. Such regimes stifle political and intellectual debate as well as effectively disabling almost all secular opposition through the medium of the mukhabarat, literally ‘intelligence’, state based on the effective penetration of society by the state’s intelligence agencies with the overriding objective of assuring the security and longevity of existing regimes. Mohammed Ayoob has demonstrated that the variety of strands of Islamism ensures that there is no consensus either on what constitutes an Islamic political system or what aspects of ‘modern’ culture this involves.