Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

PHILOO 123 PHILOO 123, Study notes of Philosophy

PHILOO 123PHILOO 123PHILOO 123PHILOO 123

Typology: Study notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 04/07/2024

ednell-alaba
ednell-alaba 🇵🇭

2 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Philosophy of Religion
What is Teleological Argument?
It comes from the Greek Terms telos meaning end or goal and logos meaning reason or
rational account. Hence, teleological argument argues that since the universe has
common theme, goal, or purpose - one that is complex and intricate - then it cannot
argue just by mere chance but rather through the existence of a grand designer of the
world - a designer with certain mental properties such as intention, knowledge, and
purpose.
Means ends/order which exist is best explained by Purposive Design.
What are the three proponents anchored on the Teleological Arguments?
Paley’s Design Argument
Fine-Tuning Argument
An Intelligent Design Argument
Who is William Paley?
He is one of the major proponents of the Teleological Argument for God’s existence.
Using an argument from analogy, he argued that since we infer that there is a designer
of an artifact such as watch, the universe to and other works of nature have a grand
designer, as like the watch they are also even greater in terms of their order and
complexity.
“means ordered to ends”
What does a Fine-tuning argument mean?
The fundamental laws and parameters of Physics and initial conditions of the universe
are extraordinarily balanced - or “finely tuned” - with just the right conditions for life to
occur and flourish.
Who is Robin Collins?
One of the foremost defenders of the fine-tuning teleological argument.
“the initial conditions of the universe are balanced on a ‘razor’s edge” for the
existence of life.
What does the Intelligent Design argue?
The intelligent design movement regards that the Darwinian vision that undirected
natural causes that produces the full diversity and complexity of life to be inadequate.
Who is William Dembski?
Leader in the movement, argues that demonstrating transcendent design in the universe
is a scientific interference, not a philosophical pipedream.
Philosophy of Religion (MIDTERMS COVERAGE)
Teleological Arguments for God’s existence
If there are events, objects or structures in the natural world which are both complex and specified,
Dembski concludes that design best explains them.
Explanatory Filter for detecting design
Does a law explain it?
Does chance explain it?
Does design explain it?
Who is Michael Behe?
He is a biochemist that coined the term “irreducibly complex”
Single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that
contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts
causes the system to effectively cease functioning.
irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously
improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism)
by slight successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to
an
irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional.
Are evolution and creation compatible?
Evolution and creation can be compatible depending on one's interpretation of religious
texts and scientific theories. While some see aspects of evolutionary theory, such as
natural selection, as compatible with the concept of creation, others view them as
conflicting. Proponents of the teleological design argument may find harmony between
the intricate design of the universe and the idea of a creator. Conversely, those
supporting the fine-tuning argument or intelligent design may question the purely
naturalistic explanations provided by evolution. Ultimately, the compatibility of evolution
and creation hinges on individual interpretations of religious beliefs and scientific
evidence.
Paley’s Design argument
PALEY’S DESIGN ARGUMENT BOX
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download PHILOO 123 PHILOO 123 and more Study notes Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Philosophy of Religion

What is Teleological Argument? It comes from the Greek Terms telos meaning end or goal and logos meaning reason or rational account. Hence, teleological argument argues that since the universe has common theme, goal, or purpose - one that is complex and intricate - then it cannot argue just by mere chance but rather through the existence of a grand designer of the world - a designer with certain mental properties such as intention, knowledge , and purpose. Means ends/order which exist is best explained by Purposive Design. What are the three proponents anchored on the Teleological Arguments? Paley’s Design Argument Fine-Tuning Argument An Intelligent Design Argument Who is William Paley? He is one of the major proponents of the Teleological Argument for God’s existence. Using an argument from analogy, he argued that since we infer that there is a designer of an artifact such as watch, the universe to and other works of nature have a grand designer, as like the watch they are also even greater in terms of their order and complexity. “means ordered to ends” What does a Fine-tuning argument mean? The fundamental laws and parameters of Physics and initial conditions of the universe are extraordinarily balanced - or “finely tuned” - with just the right conditions for life to occur and flourish. Who is Robin Collins? One of the foremost defenders of the fine-tuning teleological argument. “the initial conditions of the universe are balanced on a ‘razor’s edge” for the existence of life. What does the Intelligent Design argue? The intelligent design movement regards that the Darwinian vision that undirected natural causes that produces the full diversity and complexity of life to be inadequate. Who is William Dembski? Leader in the movement, argues that demonstrating transcendent design in the universe is a scientific interference, not a philosophical pipedream.

Philosophy of Religion (MIDTERMS COVERAGE)

Teleological Arguments for God’s existence

If there are events, objects or structures in the natural world which are both complex and specified, Dembski concludes that design best explains them. Explanatory Filter for detecting design Does a law explain it? Does chance explain it? Does design explain it? Who is Michael Behe? He is a biochemist that coined the term “irreducibly complex” Single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism) by slight successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional. Are evolution and creation compatible? Evolution and creation can be compatible depending on one's interpretation of religious texts and scientific theories. While some see aspects of evolutionary theory, such as natural selection, as compatible with the concept of creation, others view them as conflicting. Proponents of the teleological design argument may find harmony between the intricate design of the universe and the idea of a creator. Conversely, those supporting the fine-tuning argument or intelligent design may question the purely naturalistic explanations provided by evolution. Ultimately, the compatibility of evolution and creation hinges on individual interpretations of religious beliefs and scientific evidence.

Paley’s Design argument

PALEY’S DESIGN ARGUMENT BOX

  1. Artifacts (such as a watch), with their means to ends configurations, are the products of (human) design.
  2. The works of nature, such as the human hand, resemble artifacts.
  3. Thus the works of nature are probably the products of design.
  4. Furthermore, the works of nature are much more in number and far greater in complexity.
  5. Therefore, the works of nature were probably the products of a grand designer – one much more powerful and intelligent than a human designer. OBJECTIONS TO PALEY’S DESIGN ARGUMENT BOX Objections 1-3: Hume’s Rebuttal
  6. The analogy between the works of nature and human artifacts is not particularly strong: since (1) unlike watchers, there is only one universe, hence we cannot compare it to or judge it by another and (2) in many ways the world (all works of nature) is not like a human artifact or machine but is more easily conceived as a great animal or vegetable
  7. Even if we could infer a grand designer of the universe, the designer turns out to be something less than the God of the theistic religion: There cannot be an infinite grand designer. The world is not perfect so the it is reasonable to presume that the designer must have corresponding defects as well.
  8. Just because a universe has the appearance of design, it does not follow that it is in fact designed: The universe consists of a finite number of particles moving in random motion. Eventually, these particles will end up becoming stable and this would have merely happen by chance without actually being a design but merely posits an appearance of one. Rebuttals or Responses:
  9. While the world is unique, it doesn’t mean that the an argument of analogy cannot be applied. If analogies could not be applied to unique events, absurd conclusions would follow. The watch analogy captures the central point: purpose, order, and intention.
  10. It does arguably provide evidence that there is likely a grand designer of the world - a designer of the works of nature of which the world is composed. Evil and imperfections in the world does not mean divine omnibenevolence but rather purpose, intention, and design. God created humans to have Free will, hence it can be argued that it still part of the design.
  11. Hume’s third rebuttal could have arisen from mere chance, leads to Charles Darwin objection on Paley’s argument. Objection 4: Darwinian view of Biological Organisms
  12. Living organisms developed from simpler to more complex forms (evolution) through the purely natural and non -purposive processes of random variation, natural selection and survival of the fittest.
  13. Just because a universe has the appearance of design; it does not follow that it is in fact designed: law of nature and chance Rebuttals or Responses:
  14. Not everyone is convinced that a purely naturalistic, non-purposive account provides complete explanation for all the flora and fauna that exists in the natural world.
  15. The evolutionary process is the very method by which the designer is bringing about his intentions and purposes of the world.

Finely-Tuned Argument

EXTRAORDINARILY BALANCED OR “FINELY-TUNED”

  1. The fine-tuning of the universe either happened by chance, necessity, or intelligent design.
  2. The fine-tuning of the universe did not happen by chance or necessity.
  3. Therefore, the fine-tuning of the universe happened by intelligent design. Examples: If the explosion of the big ban had different in strength as little as one part in 10^ If the strong nuclear force, the force that binds protons and neutrons together in an atom, had been stronger or weaker by as little as 5% If gravity had been stronger or weaker by one part in 10^ If the neutron were not about 1.001 times the mass of the proton If the electromagnetic force were slightly stronger or weaker OBJECTIONS TO EXTRAORDINARILY BALANCED OR “FINELY-TUNED” The Many-Universes Hypothesis
  4. One way of explaining our finely tuned universe without positing an intelligent designer is to suggest that there are a very large number of universes – perhaps an infinite number of them.
  5. Given this large number, it is not surprising that at least one of them (ours in this case) include life-permitting initial conditions and parameters.
  6. While it is more probable that a universe arising from chance would include life-prohibiting parameters, if the number of universes is large enough, certainly some of them would have just the right parameters for life. Recent advances in string theory and inflationary cosmology have also led scholars to take seriously the notion of multiple universes. Rebuttals or Responses:
  7. Critics note that there is currently no experimental evidence in support of the many-universes hypotheses. While there is some support in physics for string theory and inflationary cosmology, they are currently provisional and highly speculative.
  8. Furthermore, it is argued that even if there are an infinite number of universes, it seems that they must be produced by some kind of a “many-universe generator,” which would itself need to be finely tuned, and is thus in need of an intelligent designer explanation.
  9. For, even a simple mechanism like a bread maker needs to be well designed to produce loaves of bread, much more so a universe maker that produces finely tuned universes like our own.

The design argument has had a checkered history. It began with the ancient Greeks and Indus Valley peoples of India roughly 2,000 years ago, but it reached its peak in the nineteenth century with William Paley. Paley’s version of the argument – and his clever watch analogy – caught widespread attention. However, through the writings of David Hume and Charles Darwin’s revolutionary theory of evolution, the design argument stalled in the West for roughly a century. In recent decades, however, the design argument has experienced somewhat of a renaissance. There are now a variety of design arguments which are discussed in monographs, companions, and academic journals. One type is the fine-tuning argument. Utilizing discoveries in physics and cosmology, defenders of this argument maintain that the fundamental laws and parameters of physics and the initial conditions of the universe are finely tuned for life in our universe. They claim that given the narrow limits of dozens of laws and physical constants, a grand designer better explains them than does chance or necessity. However, a variety of alternative explanations have been offered for the appearance of design. These explanations include the many universes hypothesis and the anthropic principle. It is also argued that the design argument begs the question of who designed the designer, and the designer’s designer, and so on. Why not just stop with the universe itself? Another type of teleological argument in recent times is the “intelligent design”argument. Its leading proponents include William Dembski and Michael Behe. They are proposing a research program in which intelligent causes are included as a component for understanding the diversity and complexity of life. Objections to this movement are multifaceted and include both challenges to its theoretical underpinnings as well as to the alleged scientific evidence in support of it. There is currently much scholarly activity occurring concerning design arguments. Some are convinced that one or more of the arguments point to a grand designer of the cosmos; others are convinced that they do not; and still others are undecided. In any event, Paley and Hume would perhaps be delighted to know that their legacies on this topic continue to our own day … with no end in sight. a challenge. Additionally, only a fraction of the flagellum's parts are found elsewhere in the cell, leaving other components lacking a Darwinian explanation. Nonetheless, critics argue that the absence of a current naturalistic explanation doesn't imply the absence of one, raising concerns about the philosophical assumptions underlying the intelligent design argument.

Summary: