


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
PHILOO 123PHILOO 123PHILOO 123PHILOO 123
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
What is Teleological Argument? It comes from the Greek Terms telos meaning end or goal and logos meaning reason or rational account. Hence, teleological argument argues that since the universe has common theme, goal, or purpose - one that is complex and intricate - then it cannot argue just by mere chance but rather through the existence of a grand designer of the world - a designer with certain mental properties such as intention, knowledge , and purpose. Means ends/order which exist is best explained by Purposive Design. What are the three proponents anchored on the Teleological Arguments? Paley’s Design Argument Fine-Tuning Argument An Intelligent Design Argument Who is William Paley? He is one of the major proponents of the Teleological Argument for God’s existence. Using an argument from analogy, he argued that since we infer that there is a designer of an artifact such as watch, the universe to and other works of nature have a grand designer, as like the watch they are also even greater in terms of their order and complexity. “means ordered to ends” What does a Fine-tuning argument mean? The fundamental laws and parameters of Physics and initial conditions of the universe are extraordinarily balanced - or “finely tuned” - with just the right conditions for life to occur and flourish. Who is Robin Collins? One of the foremost defenders of the fine-tuning teleological argument. “the initial conditions of the universe are balanced on a ‘razor’s edge” for the existence of life. What does the Intelligent Design argue? The intelligent design movement regards that the Darwinian vision that undirected natural causes that produces the full diversity and complexity of life to be inadequate. Who is William Dembski? Leader in the movement, argues that demonstrating transcendent design in the universe is a scientific interference, not a philosophical pipedream.
If there are events, objects or structures in the natural world which are both complex and specified, Dembski concludes that design best explains them. Explanatory Filter for detecting design Does a law explain it? Does chance explain it? Does design explain it? Who is Michael Behe? He is a biochemist that coined the term “irreducibly complex” Single system composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism) by slight successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional. Are evolution and creation compatible? Evolution and creation can be compatible depending on one's interpretation of religious texts and scientific theories. While some see aspects of evolutionary theory, such as natural selection, as compatible with the concept of creation, others view them as conflicting. Proponents of the teleological design argument may find harmony between the intricate design of the universe and the idea of a creator. Conversely, those supporting the fine-tuning argument or intelligent design may question the purely naturalistic explanations provided by evolution. Ultimately, the compatibility of evolution and creation hinges on individual interpretations of religious beliefs and scientific evidence.
The design argument has had a checkered history. It began with the ancient Greeks and Indus Valley peoples of India roughly 2,000 years ago, but it reached its peak in the nineteenth century with William Paley. Paley’s version of the argument – and his clever watch analogy – caught widespread attention. However, through the writings of David Hume and Charles Darwin’s revolutionary theory of evolution, the design argument stalled in the West for roughly a century. In recent decades, however, the design argument has experienced somewhat of a renaissance. There are now a variety of design arguments which are discussed in monographs, companions, and academic journals. One type is the fine-tuning argument. Utilizing discoveries in physics and cosmology, defenders of this argument maintain that the fundamental laws and parameters of physics and the initial conditions of the universe are finely tuned for life in our universe. They claim that given the narrow limits of dozens of laws and physical constants, a grand designer better explains them than does chance or necessity. However, a variety of alternative explanations have been offered for the appearance of design. These explanations include the many universes hypothesis and the anthropic principle. It is also argued that the design argument begs the question of who designed the designer, and the designer’s designer, and so on. Why not just stop with the universe itself? Another type of teleological argument in recent times is the “intelligent design”argument. Its leading proponents include William Dembski and Michael Behe. They are proposing a research program in which intelligent causes are included as a component for understanding the diversity and complexity of life. Objections to this movement are multifaceted and include both challenges to its theoretical underpinnings as well as to the alleged scientific evidence in support of it. There is currently much scholarly activity occurring concerning design arguments. Some are convinced that one or more of the arguments point to a grand designer of the cosmos; others are convinced that they do not; and still others are undecided. In any event, Paley and Hume would perhaps be delighted to know that their legacies on this topic continue to our own day … with no end in sight. a challenge. Additionally, only a fraction of the flagellum's parts are found elsewhere in the cell, leaving other components lacking a Darwinian explanation. Nonetheless, critics argue that the absence of a current naturalistic explanation doesn't imply the absence of one, raising concerns about the philosophical assumptions underlying the intelligent design argument.