


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
first person experience about gestalt
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
My Emotion Gestalts While I'm in the process of learning about Gestalt Theory in my class, I find it challenging to distinguish between my personal experiences and the theoretical concepts of Gestalt. Naturally, as a living being, I encounter phenomena related to grouping, prägnanz, and figure-ground segregation. However, I struggle to immediately and accurately label these phenomena in my everyday perception. Moreover, I don't easily separate these experiences from my daily life because I perceive them as an integral part of my existence. Consequently, my experiences don't always align directly with the concepts of Gestalt Theory. Although I haven't had the opportunity to directly apply these concepts, I'd like to share some of the emotions I've encountered while attempting to relate my experiences to Gestalt Theory. My initial encounter of grouping took place during a conversation with a friend, where we delved into the realm of emotions. When discussing negative emotions, I found myself effortlessly listing various names such as "huzursuzluk, mutsuzluk, üzgünlük, belirsizlik, korku, acı, tiksinti, endişe, suçluluk, kaygı" Each of these words triggered a distinct emotional response within me. Although these words share some commonalities, each one evoked a unique feeling. That is, feeling pain, disgust, and anxious is different based on their distinctive reflections on me. However, when we attempted to differentiate between positive emotions, we only mentioned "mutluluk, neşe, güven, rahatlık” (We tried to find different positive emotions, but we felt like those names can be labeled under these emotions.). Surprisingly, these positive emotions seemed to share something in common for me. I could effortlessly and promptly group them together. But as I endeavored to distinguish between them, I could only discern a subtle distinction, akin to the fleeting appearance of blinking stars in the night sky. In other words, these differences dissipated so rapidly that I struggled to label the distinctions between these positive emotions. I don’t think that it is about the difference among the numbers of emotions that I can list. I think it is about the grouping within my phenomenal perceiving, sensing, and cognizing of negative and positive emotions. In my phenomenal world, negative emotions are individual links of chain (see the figure below). Although some of them sometimes -in the context- intersect, I can feel and conceptualize them separately. However, positive emotions are more likely to be grouped together. When I pick one positive emotion, it inherently includes and awaken others. It can be imagined as holding a chain where every part is linked and interconnected.
I would explain^1 this phenomenon by suggesting that we may tend to engage more deeply with our negative emotions. This tendency might derive from our natural proneness to analyze, interpret, and explain negative emotions in a greater detail because we are motivated to identify the issues causing these emotions and, ultimately, seek solutions to alleviate them. That is to say, we cannot be “economical” about these negative emotions as grouping concept suggests because we need to get rid of them as fast as possible. This focus on “addressing and getting rid of negative emotions" is a mindset that we are affected by over our lifetime, largely influenced by societal norms and the expectations placed upon us. Moreover, our inclination to concentrate on negative emotions can be traced back to our survival instincts and the desire to reduce potential threats or discomfort. When we experience negative emotions, our minds often interpret them as signals that warrant our attention or action. This heightened focus on resolving negative emotional states is connected to our innate drive for problem-solving, adaptability, and overall well-being. Therefore, we probably need to use maximum level of energy, that may be the reason why grouping negative emotions together is hard for me. In other words, we have to spend our time and energy to reach a better mood, we do not have another choice. (^1) Though this explanation might be a quite mechanistic, functionalistic, and structuralist one, I am not able to put it another way (maybe a holistic perspective would be better).
underscoring the innate human tendency to perceive the world in a holistic and harmonious manner, as emphasized by Gestalt Theory. In conclusion, my exploration of Gestalt Theory has revealed a complex and harmonic interplay between the abstract concepts and my personal, lived experiences. The challenges I face in immediately and accurately labeling these principles in my everyday perception reflect the inherent nature of these concepts, which often operate at an undetectable level, maybe at unconscious level. Moreover, my tendency to engage more deeply with negative emotions and the seemingly effortless grouping of positive emotions exemplify the intricate relationship between cognitive processes and emotional responses. The intriguing classroom experience, where I grappled with visually segregating elements that seemed naturally interconnected may display that these theoretical concepts can have an impact on our emotions and perceptions. As I continue to navigate this exploration, I will try to gain deeper insights into the ways in which Gestalt Theory influences and intersects with my personal experiences, bridging the gap between theory and lived reality.