Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Life or Death? Developing Argumentative Essays 119, Study notes of Technical English

Read the following argumentative essay. ... 2 The first reason for allowing the death penalty is for the sake of punishment itself.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 🇵🇭

4.4

(652)

10K documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ACTIVITY 4 {.h**riar6 It;?*rJnil:;
Read the following argumentative essay. Circle the modal in parentheses that you feel is more appropriate.
Life or Death?
I How would you feel if a loved one were murdered? Would you
want retributircn, or wouid sending the killer to prison be enough?
This question has been asked many times, but people are not in
agreement about the ultimate punishment. l{e alt know that it is
wrong to take a human life, but if our government does the killing,
is it still a crime? Sorne people say that the government does not
have the right to end someone's life, but the following reasons
(rnlXh+/qi11 ) showwhy capital punishment should be preserved.
2 The first reason for allowing the death penalty is for the sake of
punishment itself. Most people agree that criminals who commit serious crimes rrtrrd+/ghould ) be
separated from society. The punishment (Witl/oU$t {o ) depend on rhe degree of the crime. Capftal
punishment, the most severe form of punishment, ends criminals'lives. It seems reasonable that this
severe punishmentbe reserved for those rvho commit the most serious of crimes.
3 The second reason to preserve capital punishment is financial. The government $[ru[//rlill ) not
have to spend a lot of money on criminals. Next to capital punishment, the most seyere punishment
is a life sentence in prison, where the government (Iniehyha, t0 ) take care of criminals untii they die
naturally. These criminals do not work, but they receive free housing and food. It is unfair to use tax
dollars for such a purpose.
4 The last reason for continuing the use of the death penalty is based on the purpose of
government. If the government has legitimate power to make, judge, and carry out the laws,
it (WrOU/Sh:uli 1 ,tto have the power to decide if criminals should die. Capital punishment is
iike any other sentence. If one believes that the government has the right to charge a fine or put
crirninals into jail, then the government (could f wuot ) also have the same power to decide the fate
of a prisoner's life.
Developing Argumentative Essays 119
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Life or Death? Developing Argumentative Essays 119 and more Study notes Technical English in PDF only on Docsity!

ACTIVITY 4 {.h*riar6 It;?rJnil:;

Read the (^) following argumentative essay. Circle the modal (^) in parentheses that you (^) feel is more appropriate.

Life or Death?

I How would you feel if (^) a loved one were murdered? Would you

want retributircn, or wouid sending the killer to prison be enough?

This question has been asked many times, but people are not in

agreement about the ultimate punishment. l{e alt know that it is

wrong to take a human life, but if our government does the killing,

is it still a crime? Sorne people say that the government does not

have the right to end someone's life, but the following reasons

(rnlXh+/qi11 (^) ) showwhy capital (^) punishment should be preserved. 2 The first reason for (^) allowing the death penalty is for the sake of

punishment itself. Most people agree that criminals who commit serious crimes rrtrrd+/ghould ) be

separated from society. The punishment (Witl/oU$t {o ) depend on rhe degree of the crime. Capftal

punishment, the (^) most severe form of punishment, (^) ends criminals'lives. It seems reasonable that this severe punishmentbe (^) reserved for those rvho commit (^) the most serious of crimes. 3 The second reason to preserve capital punishment (^) is financial. The government (^) $[ru[//rlill ) not have to spend a lot of money on criminals. Next to capital punishment, the most (^) seyere punishment is a life sentence in prison, where the government (Iniehyha, (^) t0 ) take care of criminals (^) untii they die naturally. These criminals do not work, but they receive free housing and food. (^) It is unfair to use tax dollars for such a purpose. 4 The last reason for continuing (^) the use of the death penalty is (^) based on the purpose of government. If the government has legitimate power to make, judge, (^) and carry out the laws,

it (WrOU/Sh:uli^1 ,tto have the power to decide if criminals should die. Capital punishment is

iike any other sentence. If one believes that the government has the right to charge a fine or put

crirninals into jail, then the government (could f wuot ) also have the same power to decide the fate

of a prisoner's life.

Developing Argumentative Essays 119

5 The opponents of capital punishment (yvruet^ /Vn,qW ) say that nobody has the right to decide

who should die, including the government. However, when the government sends soldiers^ into

war, in some !vay, it is deciding those soldiers' fate; some will live and some will be killed. As^ long

as the government^ has^ the^ right^ to^ send^ its citizens^ to^ the^ battlefield, it^ has^ a^ right^ to^ put criminals

to death.

6 There are many good reasons to preserve capital punishment. Certainly not every criminal

1 ca.rn^ /should ) be^ put to^ death. Capital^ punishment^ t^ ow6hth^ /Witl )^ be^ viewed^ as^ the harshest^ form

of punishment.^ If^ no^ punishment^ cailr,^ I e^ hot,tU ,^ reform^ a^ murderer,^ then^ capital^ punishment^ is

the best thing that can be done for that person and for^ society.