

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
LEGL 2700 EXAM 2025 WITH 100% ACCURATE SOLUTIONS
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) - Precise Answer ✔✔Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution implicitly guarantees citizens' right to privacy--dealt with banned use of contraceptives (Comstock Act) Stanley v. Georgia (1969) - Precise Answer ✔✔Police searched Robert Stanley's home looking for bookmaking materials, but they instead found pornographic films and arrested him for possessing obscene materials in violation of Georgia law Court overturned the conviction and ruled that there is a constitutional right to possess and use even obscene materials in the privacy of one's home Roe v. Wade (1973) - Precise Answer ✔✔The court legalized abortion by ruling that state laws could not restrict it during the first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th Amendment rights of a person to be secure in their persons. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) - Precise Answer ✔✔SC ruled that state law may not ban sexual relations between same-sex partners Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) - Precise Answer ✔✔Struck down state bans on same sex marriage. The 14th Amendment requires States to license a marriage between two people of the same sex. States must recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State. (Roberts Court) Sea Search Armada v. Republic of Columbia - Precise Answer ✔✔San Jose ship sunk with treasure/gallions/coins; decided on 50/50 split but Columbian gov changed hands and they denied that; Roessing's firm picked up the case but it was too late--Statute of Limitations!! Marbury v. Madison (1803) - Precise Answer ✔✔Established judicial review; asserted power of courts; Adams was leaving, Jefferson was coming-- Adams gave a bunch of positions to friends, but Jefferson
decided to not give them these positions in his administration; Marshall (chief justice) was in favor of Jefferson C-Murder - Precise Answer ✔✔Corey Miller--LA state law says you don't need a unanimous jury decision to convict someone; 10-2 decision convicted C-Murder of murder Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado (2017) - Precise Answer ✔✔He was convicted of sexual conduct/harassment; jurors make racially bias comments -Conclusion: Violated right to impartial jury (6th Amendment) -SC had 5-4 decision allowing him to a new trial Juliana v US - Precise Answer ✔✔claims that US hasn't done enough to combat climate change, and it's affecting this generation-- 9th circuit just dismissed it bc she doesn't have standing yet-- it's too hypothetical as of now Spokeo v. Robins - Precise Answer ✔✔info screw up (Robins suing Spokeo for providing wrong info about him being married, employed, and having degrees)-- what's the injury? When applying for jobs, he seems already employed or too qualified; SC granted him standing to sue just so he could finally begin the case Mayer v. Belichick - Precise Answer ✔✔-standing to sue at issue -ISSUE: videotaping the NY Jets coaches and players on the field w/ the purpose of illegally recording, capturing, and stealing the NY Jets signals and visual coaching instructions by the Patriots o Mayer sues the Patriots and Belichick bc he had figured out the Jets' plays which Mayer said gave an "unfair advantage" and therefore was not a fair football game for which he had paid to watch. Belichick got fined, but court told Mayer he did not have standing to sue because he did not suffer a direct, immediate harm from the unfair behavior Saladin v City of Milledgeville - Precise Answer ✔✔Milledgeville had a city seal stamped and painted in prominent places (with angel riding eagle that said "liberty and christianity"); question of violating the establishment clause and separation of church and state-- Saladin= humanist, strong advocate for separation of church and state; does he have standing to sue? Feels isolated due to faith-- claimed city made them feel like 2nd class citizens and court agreed with Saladin