Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Shows results of the over all assessment. Provide also solutions.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 44
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Evaluation and Identify Cleaner Production opportunities…………………………….
Upon completion of the assessment, we will develop a set of tailored recommendations and strategies specifically designed to enhance Foundation University's environmental performance through the adoption of cleaner production methods. These recommendations will address key areas identified during the assessment, providing actionable steps that can be taken to minimize waste, improve resource efficiency, and mitigate the university's environmental footprint.
By undertaking this assessment, we envision a future in which Foundation University serves as a beacon of sustainability and inspires positive change within the higher education sector. We are confident that our findings and recommendations will contribute to a more environmentally conscious and responsible university, promoting cleaner production practices as an integral part of our commitment to sustainable development.
Assess the current state of cleaner production practices in various departments and facilities within Foundation University.
Identify areas of improvement and potential sources of waste, pollution, or inefficiency in the university's operational processes.
Evaluate the environmental impact of the university's activities, such as energy consumption, waste generation, and water usage.
Examine the awareness and adoption of sustainable practices among faculty, staff, and students, and identify potential barriers to implementation.
Develop a set of recommendations and strategies to enhance the university's environmental performance through cleaner production methods.
When assessing cleaner production in universities, it is essential to consider not only its environmental impact but also its social impact. Chen and Wang (2023) emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach that goes beyond environmental considerations. Indicators related to community engagement, employee well-being, and student involvement should be utilized to measure the broader societal benefits of cleaner production practices in universities.
Universities are actively adopting innovative approaches and technological advancements to enhance cleaner production practices. Liu and Zhang (2022) highlight emerging trends in cleaner production, including energy efficiency, renewable energy systems, waste management, and digitalization. By adopting smart building systems, renewable energy technologies, waste reduction initiatives, and digital platforms, universities aim to improve their environmental performance and sustainability.
The successful implementation of cleaner production practices in higher education institutions requires stakeholder engagement and curriculum integration. Smith and Johnson (2021) emphasize the importance of engaging stakeholders from various sectors to foster collaboration and integrate cleaner production principles into the university curriculum. Implementing cleaner production practices not only benefits the institution's resource conservation and cost savings but also contributes to environmental sustainability beyond the campus boundaries.
To evaluate the effectiveness of cleaner production initiatives in universities, it is crucial to assess key indicators such as energy efficiency, waste management, and carbon emissions reduction. By examining these indicators, the review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the extent to which Cleaner Production practices contribute to achieving tangible environmental improvements in university campuses. Lee and Chen (2022) conducted a systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive understanding of the environmental improvements achieved through cleaner production practices. The findings contribute to evidence-based decision-making and inform future research and practical applications in university settings.
The cleaner production assessment will specifically evaluate the environmental approaches and practices implemented within Foundation University. The assessment will focus on identifying opportunities for improving resource efficiency, reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste generation, and mitigating environmental impacts within the university's operations.
Delimitation:
Geographic Scope : The assessment will be limited to the facilities and operations of Foundation University, located in Dumaguete City. It will not encompass external entities or off-campus activities unless directly linked to the university's environmental approaches. Data Availability : The assessment will be conducted based on the available data and information provided by Foundation University. In cases where data gaps exist, reasonable assumptions and estimates may be made to complete the assessment. Timeframe : The assessment will cover a specific time period, such as the previous year or the most recent available data, to evaluate the current state of the university's environmental approaches. Focus on Environmental Aspects : The assessment will primarily concentrate on the environmental aspects of cleaner production, including resource efficiency, energy consumption, waste management, water usage, air emissions, and other related environmental indicators. It will not extensively cover social or economic aspects unless directly linked to environmental performance. Internal Operations : The assessment will primarily focus on the internal operations of Foundation University, including academic activities, administrative functions, facilities management, and support services. It will not encompass broader issues related to curriculum development, external partnerships, or community outreach programs unless directly affecting the university's environmental approaches.
The following are the methodology based on the UNEP/UNIDO cleaner production assessment methodology:
Phase I: Pre-assessment ● Company description and flowchart ● Walk-through inspection Phase II: Assessment ● Assessment of university environmental approaches ● Identify Cleaner Production opportunities ● Record and sort options Phase III: Evaluation and Identify Cleaner Opportunities ● Preliminary, Technical, Economic, and Environmental evaluation ● Select viable options
Additionally, there are sports facilities, including a gymnasium and outdoor sports complexes, to promote physical activities and sports programs.
Academic Programs:
This institution offers a wide range of academic programs at the undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral levels. These programs cover various fields of study, including business, education, engineering, computer science, nursing, arts and sciences, and more. The university's academic programs are designed to provide students with a solid foundation in their chosen disciplines and prepare them for professional careers. Foundation University also fosters research and industry partnerships to enhance the quality of its academic programs and ensure their relevance to the needs of the society and the job market.
Sustainability Initiatives:
Foundation University is committed to sustainability and has implemented various initiatives to reduce its environmental impact. The university promotes energy conservation, waste management, and sustainable practices on campus. It has integrated sustainability into its curriculum to raise awareness and educate students about environmental issues. The university is continuously exploring ways to further improve its sustainability practices and reduce its carbon footprint.
Collaboration and Outreach:
Foundation University actively collaborates with external stakeholders to foster knowledge exchange and address societal challenges. The university engages with industries, government agencies, community organizations, and international partners to develop collaborative projects and initiatives. These collaborations may involve joint research projects, internships, industry partnerships, and community development programs. Foundation University aims
to be a catalyst for positive change in its surrounding communities and actively contributes to regional and global initiatives.
Accreditation and Recognition:
Foundation University holds accreditation from the Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU)
As the assessors conducted an inspection in the campus, they used a list of questions taken from the NSW-DSRD/NSW-EPA, which could help be guided during the investigation and obtaining information.
TABLE 1. WALK-THROUGH INSPECTION IN FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY
Questions Responses
Are there signs of poor housekeeping?
No instances of poor housekeeping observed. The common areas are clutter- free and regularly cleaned by staff and student assistants. The floors are maintained and free from dirt or stains. There are no unpleasant odors, and the restrooms are kept clean and tidy. The only issue is that garbage is sometimes not segregated despite signage. Are there noticeable spills or leaks? Is there any evidence of past spills, such as discoloration or corrosion on walls, work surfaces, ceilings, or pipes?
No spills or leaks were observed during the inspection. There was no evidence of discoloration or corrosion on walls, work surfaces, ceilings, or pipes, indicating the absence of past spills. Are water taps dripping or left running? Water taps and sources are not dripping or left running. They are well-maintained. Are there any signs of smoke, dirt, or fumes to indicate material losses?
There were no signs of smoke, dirt, or fumes that could indicate material losses during the inspection. Are there any strange odors or emissions that cause irritation to the eyes, nose, or throat?
No unusual odors or emissions causing irritation to the eyes, nose, or throat were noticed during the inspection.
Is the noise level high?
The noise level inside the campus was not high during the walk-through inspection. The main source of noise was from the nearby highway and passing vehicles.
Are there open containers, stacked drums, or other indicators of poor storage procedures?
No open containers, stacked drums, or other indicators suggesting poor storage procedures were observed during the inspection. Are all containers labeled with their contents and hazards?
It was noted that all containers were labeled with their contents and associated hazards, ensuring proper identification and handling.
Have you noticed any waste and emissions being generated from process equipment (dripping water, steam, evaporation)?
No instances of waste and emissions were observed from process equipment, such as dripping water, steam, or evaporation.
Do employees have any comments about the sources of waste and emissions in the company?
Employees provided positive feedback, expressing that the university demonstrates high regard and care for the environment. No specific comments were mentioned regarding the sources of waste and emissions in the company.
Is emergency equipment (fire extinguishers, etc.) available and visible to ensure rapid response to a fire, spill, or other incident?
It was observed that emergency equipment, including fire extinguishers and fire alarms, are strategically placed on every floor of department buildings, ensuring their availability and visibility for a quick response to fire, spills, or other incidents.
The walk-through inspection at Foundation University provides valuable insights in relation to the cleaner production assessment. The university demonstrates positive practices and measures across various areas, including housekeeping, waste management, preventive maintenance, emergency preparedness, and employee engagement.
Despite the positive practices, there are still areas that requires further improvement which will be addressed and discussed later on in this assessment.
During the interview with Mrs. Russelle Jamili, the safety and health officer at Foundation University, valuable insights were gained regarding the university's environmental approaches and sustainability programs. The discussion covered various aspects of the university's efforts in waste management, energy consumption, water usage, and monitoring systems.
