



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A comprehensive guide to writing a literature review, covering its purpose, components, and step-by-step process. It includes examples and annotations to illustrate key concepts and best practices. Particularly useful for students in academic disciplines where research and scholarly writing are essential.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Literature Review
What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of a particular topic. Literature reviews are a collection of the most relevant and significant publications regarding that topic in order to provide a comprehensive look at what has been said on the topic and by whom. The basic components of a literature review include
A sample Literature Review section with Annotations follows on the next page.
through 6 years old when studying EA (Aouad & Nasr, 2005). When EA was first described by Eckenhoff in 1961, it was speculated that patients undergoing head and neck procedures may have a sense of suffocation during emergence from anesthesia, thus increasing the chance of EA. Surgical procedures that have been found to increase the risk of developing EA are otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, and neck procedures, all of which may produce a sense of suffocation (Aouad & Nasr, 2005; Vlajkovic & Sindjelic, 2007; Voepel-Lewis, Malviya, & Tait, 2003). The length of surgery in at least one study was found to be a factor associated with increased incidence of EA (Voepel-Lewis, Malviya, & Tait, 2003). In most studies, patients have been excluded if they were above ASA classes I and II, which is one limitation of the current literature (Baum, Yemen, & Baum, 1997). Exclusion criteria also included children with psychological or emotional disorders, developmental delay, and patients who needed sedative medication before induction (Abu- Shahwan, 2008). Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia Propofol TIVA techniques have also demonstrated a reduction in EA in children. In the study by Cohen et al (2003) of sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia versus a propofol TIVA technique, there were significantly higher rates of EA in the sevoflurane group compared with the propofol group (23.1% versus 3.7%). In the study by Picard et al (2000) of the quality of recovery in children, a sevoflurane inhalational anesthetic and propofol TIVA techniques were compared, with a reduction in EA rates observed in the propofol TIVA group (46% versus 9%, respectively). A reduction in EA from 42% to 11% was seen in children 2 to 5 years of age with propofol TIVA compared with sevoflurane inhalational general anesthesia (Nakayama, Furukawa, & Yanai, 2007). In a small study of children presenting for eye surgery (n = 16),
Each literature reviewsubtopic has its own thesis statement that isthen “proven” through research publications.the review of existing
reference the first^ It is important to instance of researchon your topic.
propofol TIVA technique had an EA incidence of 0%, in contrast to a cohort managed with sevoflurane inhalational general anesthetic, which produced an EA incidence of 38% (Uezono et al, 2000). The studies summarized in Table 3 compare EA rates in sevoflurane alone, propofol TIVA alone compared with sevoflurane alone, and propofol adjunct together with sevoflurane compared with sevoflurane alone. The study findings demonstrate that either using propofol adjunctively or using propofol TIVA results in lower rates of EA compared with either sevoflurane alone or sevoflurane with adjunctive propofol. According to the literature evidence base, there is an advantage to either propofol TIVA or adjunctive propofol with sevoflurane (compared with sevoflurane alone). We conclude, based on the current evidence, that the use of propofol is associated with a reduction in the incidence of emergence agitation.
References Abu-Shahwan, I. (2008). Effect of propofol on emergence behavior in children after sevoflurane general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth, 18(1), 55–59. Aono, J., Mamiya, K., & Manabe, M. (1999). Preoperative anxiety is associated with a high incidence of problematic behavior on emergence after halothane anesthesia in boys. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 43(5), 542–544. Aouad, M. T. & Nasr, V. G. (2005). Emergence agitation in children: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 18(6), 614–619. Cohen, I. T., Finkel, J. C., Hannallah, R. S., Hummer, K. A., & Patel, K. M. (2003). Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and
Athe paper will include entries References list at the end of for each publication discussedin the literature review.
A literature reviewarticulates the purpose of your newproject, which is to current research or toeither fill a gap in provide the next stepin researching the topic.