Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Heterogeneous Panels - Econometric Analysis of Panel Data - Lecture Slides, Slides of Econometrics and Mathematical Economics

Heterogeneous Panels, Capital Asset Pricing Model, Parameter Heterogeneity, Fixed Effects Approach, Time Series, Pooling, Estimating the RPM, Price Elasticities are points which describes this lecture importance in Econometric Analysis of Panel Data course.

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 11/10/2012

uzman
uzman 🇮🇳

4.8

(12)

148 documents

1 / 41

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
11. Parameter Heterogeneity
“Heterogeneous Panels”
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29

Partial preview of the text

Download Heterogeneous Panels - Econometric Analysis of Panel Data - Lecture Slides and more Slides Econometrics and Mathematical Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Econometric Analysis of Panel Data

11. Parameter Heterogeneity – “Heterogeneous Panels”

Agenda

 Random Parameter Models

 Fixed effects

 Random effects

 Heterogeneity in Dynamic Panels

 Random Coefficient Vectors-Classical vs. Bayesian

 General RPM Swamy/Hsiao/Hildreth/Houck

 Hierarchical and “Two Step” Models

 ‘True’ Random Parameter Variation

 Discrete – Latent Class

 Continuous

 Classical  Bayesian

Cross Country Growth Convergence

i,t i,t i,t i,t^1 i,t i,t i,t-1 i,t- i,t 1 i i,t 1 i,t i i,t 1

Y K (A L )

A index of technology K capital stock = I + (1- )K I s Y Investment Savings L labor (1 n )L

α −α

− − −

= δ = = = = = +

Solow - Swan Growth Model

Equilibrium Model for Steady i,t i i i i,t 1 i,t i i i i i i

logY t log Y (1- )g , g =technological growth rate "convergence" parameter; 1- = rate of convergence to steady state Cross country comparisons of convergence rat

= μ + θ + λ (^) − + ε θ = λ λ = λ

State Income

es are the focus of study.

Heterogeneous Production Model

Health i,t (^) i iHEXP i,t (^) i EDUCi,t i,t i country, t=year Health = health care outcome, e.g., life expectancy HEXP = health care expenditure EDUC = education Parameter heterogeneity: Discrete? Aids domin

= α + β + γ + ε

ated vs. QOL dominated Continuous? Cross cultural heterogeneity World Health Organization, "The 2000 World Health Report"

Parameter Heterogeneity

it it i i i X i i i i

y

E[ | ] zero or nonzero - to be defined

E [E[ | ]] =

Var[ | ] to be defined, constant or variable

= ′ + ε = +

it i i

Generalize to Random Parameters x β

β β u

u X u X 0 u X

"The Pooling Problem : " What is the consequence

of estimating under the erroneous assumption of constant parameters. (Theil, 1960, "The Aggregation

Problem") (Maddala, 1970s - 1990s, "The Pooling

Problem")

Fixed Effects

(Hildreth, Houck, Hsiao, Swamy)

it it i i i i i i i i i i i X i i X i i i

y , each observation , T observations

Assume (temporarily) T > K. E[ | ] =g( ) (conditional mean) P[ | ] =( -E[ ]) (projection) E [E[ | ]] = E [P[ | ]] = Var[ |

= ′ + ε = + = +

it i i i i i

x β y X β ε β β u

u X X u X X X θ u X u X 0 u X i ] = Γ constant but nonzero

Estimating the Fixed Effects Model

N i 1

Estimator: Equation by equation OLS or (F)GLS (^1) ˆ Estimate? is consistent N =

          (^)        (^) =    (^) +    (^)        (^)        ^     

Σ

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2

N N N N

i

y X 0 ... 0 β ε y 0 X ... 0 β ε ... ... ... ... ... ... ... y 0 0 ... X β ε

β β for E[ βi ] in N.

Partial Fixed Effects Model

i i

Ni 1 1 Ni 1 (^) i 1 (^1) i

Some individual specific parameters

  • , T observations Use OLS and Frisch-Waugh ˆ (^) [ ] [ ], I ( ) ˆ (^) [ ] ( - ˆ) E.g., Individual specific tim

= −^ = − −

= Σ ′^ Σ ′^ = − ′^ ′
= ′^ ′

i i i i

i iD^ i i iD^ i iD i i i i i i i

y D α X β ε

β X M X X M y M D D D D

α D D D y X β

it i0 i1 it

it i0 it

e trends, y t ; Detrend individual data, then OLS E.g., Individual specific constant terms, y ; Individual group mean deviations, then OLS

= α + α + ′ + ε

= α + ′ + ε

it

it

x β

x β

Heterogeneous Dynamic Model

i,t i i i,t 1 i it i,t i i i

logY log Y x

Long run effect of interest is (^1)

Average (over countries) effect: or 1

(1) "Fixed Effects:" Separate regressions, then average results. (2) Country means (o

= μ + λ (^) − + θ + ε β = θ − λ β θ − λ

ver time) - can be manipulated to produce consistent estimators of desired parameters (3) Time series of means across countries (does not work at all) (4) Pooled - no way to obtain consistent est

i i i

imates. (5) Mixed Fixed (Weinhold - Hsiao): Build separate into the equation with "fixed effects," treat u as random.

λ θ = θ +

“Fixed Effects” Approach

i,t i i i,t 1 i it i,t i i i i i i Ni 1 (^) i Ni 1 i i Ni 1 i Ni 1

logY log Y x

1 ,^ = 1

(1) Separate regressions; ˆ, ˆ^ ,ˆ

ˆ 1 ˆ^1 ˆ

(2) Average estimates = ˆ or

N 1 N

ˆ (1 / N) ˆ

Function of averages: =

1 (1 / N)

= =

=

β = θ^ β θ

β Σ^ θ

− Σ i

i N i=1 i

In each case, each term i has variance O(1/T )

Each average has variance O(1/N) (1/N)O(1/T )

Expect consistency of estimates of long run effects.

× (^) ∑

Country Means (cont.)

i i i i, 1 i i i i i i T i i i i i i (^) i i (^) T i ii i i i i (^0) i i i i 0 0 i i i i

logY log Y x (logY (y) / T ) x

1 1 x^1 (y) / T 1 (1) Let = /(1 ), expect to be random = /(1 ) and to be random (2) Lev

= μ + λ (^) − + θ + ε = μ + λ − ∆ + θ + ε = μ^ + θ^ − λ^ ∆ + ε − λ − λ − λ − λ δ = μ − λ δ − δ β θ − λ β − β i i T i i i^0

el variable x should be uncorrelated with change (logY (y) / T ).

Regression of logY on 1, x should give consistent estimates of and.

δ β

Time Series

t Ni 1 i,t Ni 1 (^) i i,t 1 Ni 1 (^) i i,t Ni 1 i,t Ni 1 i i i Ni 1 (^) i i,t 1 1,t Ni 1 i i,t 1

log y (1 / N) log y

= + (1/N) y (1/N) x (1/N)

Use =(1/N) so ( ) then

(1/N) log y log y (1/N) ( ) log y

Likewise for (1/N)

= = − = = = = − − = −

Ni 1 i i,t

t (^) 1,t t t Ni 1 i i,t 1

x

log y log y x ( (1/N) ( ) log y ...)

Disturbance is correlated with the regressor. There is

no way out, and by construction no instrumental variable

that could be correlated

= − = −

with the regressor and not the

disturbance.

Mixed/Fixed Approach

N i,t i i 1 i i,t i,t 1 i i,t i,t i,t i i i

log y d log y x

d = country specific dummy variable. Treat and as random, is a 'fixed effect.' This model can be fit consistently by OLS.

= μ + Σ (^) = λ (^) − + θ + ε

μ θ λ

Random Effects and Random Parameters

it it i i i i i i i i

Random Parameters Model y , each observation , T observations

Assume (temporarily) T > K.

E[ | ] =

Var[ | ] constant but nonzero We differentiate the classical and

= ′ + ε = + = +

=

it i i i i i

THE x β y X β ε

β β u

u X 0 u X Γ Bayesian interpretations Randomness here is heterogeneity, not "uncertainty" Bayesian approach to be considered later.