
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A detailed grading rubric for evaluating powerpoint presentations. It covers various aspects of the presentation, including content accuracy, logical flow, slide creation, transitions, use of visuals, mechanics, technology understanding, and class presentation skills. The rubric assigns specific point values for each criterion, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of the overall quality of the presentation. This document could be useful for students preparing powerpoint presentations, as it offers clear guidelines and expectations for a successful presentation. The detailed feedback provided in the rubric can help students identify areas for improvement and ensure they meet the required standards.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
information is presented in a logical order. Content is accurate but some information is not presented in a logical order, but is still generally easy to follow. Content is accurate but information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow. Content is questionable and information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow. Content is inaccurate and information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow.
logically. Presentation reflects extensive use of tools in a creative way. Correct number of slides. Presentation flows well. Tools used correctly. Correct number of slides. Overall presentation is interesting. Presentation flows well. Some tools used to show acceptable understanding. Correct number of slides. Presentation is unorganized. Tools are not used in a relevant manner. Lacking in number of slides. Presentation has no flow. No tools used. Insufficient number of slides.
interesting. Transitions enhance the presentation. Smooth transitions are used on most slides. Smooth transitions are used on some slides. Very few transitions are used and/or they distract from the presentation. No transitions used.
Images are appropriate. Layout of images is pleasing to the eye. Images are appropriate. Layout is cluttered. Most images are appropriate. Images are inappropriate. No images.
grammar errors. Test is in authors’ own words. Few spelling errors. Few grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words. Some spelling errors. Some grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words. Some spelling errors. Some grammar errors. Most of test is in authors’ own words. Many spelling errors and/or text is copied.
Comprehensive use of technology is apparent. General understanding of technology. Acceptable understanding of technology. Little understanding of technology. No understanding of technology.
understandable voices. Good eye contact. Able to answer questions with extensive knowledge. Clear voices and good eye contact. Able to answer most questions about content. Clear voices and some eye contact. Able to answer some questions about content. Hard to understand and little eye contact. Able to answer little to no questions on content. Hard to understand and no eye contact. Unable to answer any questions about content.
resource slide is included at the end of the presentation. Resources are included, notation mistakes are evident. A resource slide is not included.