
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Gandhi Trusteeship-his doctrine
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
This is dependant on goodwill of the wealthy community. There is no legal compulsion for anyone to accept that he is mere trustee of the property and cash earned by him awfully. To say that one who spends more is a thief is also unrealistic. Nobody can be tried in court of law for mere luxurious life style out of his own lawful money
The Trusteeship doctrine cannot convince the workers that they are paid less not for personal gain of capitalist but for keeping the money in ‘trust’. In all fairness, workers, creditors and others should get their lawful dues. There is no justification to say that some part of their legitimate dues is ‘kept in trust.’
The Gandhian principle of Trusteeship goes also against market economy. The economy determines prices of all services and commodities according to demand and supply mechanism. So, everyone including the entrepreneur and workers get their dues as determined by market economy. Thus, the capitalist has got what the market mechanism gave him. why should he consider that he holds any property in trust for others. Moreover, he pays various taxes to government. The after tax income belongs to him and he may decide what part he will spend and what he will further invest in his business.
In fact, if everyone works in his own interest without breaking law and evading tax, he serves society. Nobody can earn legitimately unless his activities serve social purpose. An entrepreneur doesn't spend all his income. But he definitely does not save any part for keeping in trust for people. This he does for future contingencies and investment. This is prudent business practice. This benefits society. If everyone works for his own benefit, society is benefited.
Rather too much stress on simple living condemns the nation and people either to primitive type economy or unemployment. More consumption also creates employment opportunities
The utopian doctrine of Trusteeship is helpful neither to ‘trustees’ nor ‘beneficiaries’. So, it is best to give a decent burial to the very concept