Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Future Worth Method-Engineering Economics-Lecture Slides, Slides of Microeconomics

This lecture is part of lecture series for Engineering Economics course at M. J. P. Rohilkhand University. It was delivered by Dr. Badrinath Singh to cover following points: Supply, Demand, Markets, Work, Forces, Perfect, Competition, Monopoly, Quantity, Law, Curve

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 07/06/2012

aanila
aanila 🇮🇳

4.4

(36)

171 documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Module No. 09
Future Worth Method
Engineering
Economics
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download Future Worth Method-Engineering Economics-Lecture Slides and more Slides Microeconomics in PDF only on Docsity!

Module No. 09

Future Worth Method

Engineering

Economics

Introduction

 Besides the technical, manufacturing, and marketing decisions

that are needed, an engineer must become familiar with the

necessity of economic decision making. It is used to analyze the

economics of a situation so that combined with all the other

issues, an intelligent decision can be made.

 Like most aspects of a decision making process, there are many

alternatives to the economic decisions.

 In this method of comparison, the future worth of various

alternatives will be computed.

 The alternative with the maximum future worth of net revenue or

 With minimum future worth of cost will be selected as the best

alternative for implementation.

 Cost-dominated cash flow analysis is given as:

FW = P(I + i)n^ + C 1 (1 +i)n-1^ + C 2 (1 +i)n-2^ + …….…+ Cj(1 +i)n-j

+……….+ Cn - S

P = Initial investment

Cj = cost of operation &maintenance at the end of jth year.

S = Salvage value at the end of nth year.

 In this formula expenditures are assigned positive sign and

revenue a negative sign.

 If there are more alternatives which are to be compared, FW

amounts are computed and compared,

 the alternative with the minimum Future worth amount should

be selected as the best alternative.

Cost-Dominated cash flow analysis

Practice Questions

Consider the following two mutually exclusive alternatives

at i = 18%, select the best alternative based on future worth

method of comparison.

End of the year

Alternative 0 1 2 3 4

A -5000 2000 2000 2000 2000

B -4500 1800 1800 1800 1800

Practice Questions

 The cash flows of two mutually exclusive alternatives are

given as: all figures in (000)

 Select the best alternative based on future worth method

at i = 8%

Option A

Option B

M/S Krishna Castings Ltd. is planning to replace its annealing furnace.

It has received tenders from three different original manufacturers of annealing furnace. The details are as follows:

Which is the best alternative based on future worth method at i = 20%

Initial cost 80,00,000 70,00,000 90,00, Life (years) 12 12 12 Annual Operation & Maintenance cost

Salvage value after 12 years

Practice Questions