Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

EXSC520 CASE STUDY 1 – CORRELATION AND BIVARIATE REGRESSION TEMPLATE, Assignments of Statistics

EXSC520 CASE STUDY 1 – CORRELATION AND BIVARIATE REGRESSION TEMPLATE

Typology: Assignments

2024/2025

Available from 07/09/2025

Amanda4721
Amanda4721 🇬🇧

4.7

(6)

1.1K documents

1 / 17

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
EXSC 520
CASE STUDY 1 – CORRELATION AND BIVARIATE REGRESSION TEMPLATE
Instructions: To successfully complete this case study, all of the following instructions must be
adhered to. Only paste tables/figures that contain pertinent information. Only paste tables/
figures where you are instructed to do so. Highlight (in yellow) only relevant data from tables; as
well as your response to each question. In the write-up section, all information must be provided
in paragraph format. When statistical values are discussed, the numerical value must be given
and a reference must be made to the table(s)/figure(s) where the value(s) can be found. An
example of this is “heart rate was statistically greater during running versus cycling (189 vs. 143
bpm) as indicated in Table 1.”
I. Correlation
Research question: “Is mean heart rate during exercise correlated to body weight?
Assumptions Testing
1. Data level of measurement – what is the level of measurement for the data used in this case
study? __Ratio____________________________________________________________
2. Would the amount of skewness and kurtosis in these variables affect the analysis? How do
you know? Give numerical values to support your conclusion.
For HR no. Skewness = .015/.661 = .0227, kurtosis = .639/1.279 = -0.499
For BW yes. Skewness = 1.987/.661 = 3.006, kurtosis = 3.797/1.279 = 2.9687
Paste table below:
Descriptives
Statistic
Std.
Error
Mean_heart_rate_
BPM
Mean 132.27 4.811
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower
Bound
121.55
Upper
Bound
142.99
5% Trimmed Mean 132.08
Median 134.00
Variance 254.618
Std. Deviation 15.957
Minimum 108
Maximum 160
Range 52
Interquartile Range 29
Skewness .015 .661
Page 1 of 17
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download EXSC520 CASE STUDY 1 – CORRELATION AND BIVARIATE REGRESSION TEMPLATE and more Assignments Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

CASE STUDY 1 – CORRELATION AND BIVARIATE REGRESSION TEMPLATE

Instructions: To successfully complete this case study, all of the following instructions must be adhered to. Only paste tables/figures that contain pertinent information. Only paste tables/ figures where you are instructed to do so. Highlight (in yellow) only relevant data from tables; as well as your response to each question. In the write-up section, all information must be provided in paragraph format. When statistical values are discussed, the numerical value must be given and a reference must be made to the table(s)/figure(s) where the value(s) can be found. An example of this is “heart rate was statistically greater during running versus cycling (189 vs. 143 bpm) as indicated in Table 1.” I. Correlation Research question: “ Is mean heart rate during exercise correlated to body weight? ” Assumptions Testing

  1. Data level of measurement – what is the level of measurement for the data used in this case study? __Ratio____________________________________________________________
  2. Would the amount of skewness and kurtosis in these variables affect the analysis? How do you know? Give numerical values to support your conclusion. For HR no. Skewness = .015/.661 = .0227, kurtosis = .639/1.279 = -0. For BW yes. Skewness = 1.987/.661 = 3.006, kurtosis = 3.797/1.279 = 2. Paste table below: Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Mean_heart_rate_ BPM Mean 132.27 4. 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound

Upper Bound

5% Trimmed Mean 132. Median 134. Variance 254. Std. Deviation 15. Minimum 108 Maximum 160 Range 52 Interquartile Range 29 Skewness .015.

Kurtosis -.639 1. Body_weight_Kg Mean 85.391 4. 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound

Upper Bound

5% Trimmed Mean 84. Median 80. Variance 194. Std. Deviation 13. Minimum 73. Maximum 120. Range 46. Interquartile Range 9. Skewness 1.987. Kurtosis 3.797 1.

3. Was the assumption of normality met and how do you know? For mean heart rate yes, because sig is greater than .05 - .842. Body weight no, it is smaller than .05 - .002. Table 2. Tests of normality Paste table below: Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova^ Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Mean_heart_rate_ BPM

.147 11 .200*^ .966 11.

Figure 2. Normal Q-Q plot for each variable Paste figure below:

Statistical Analysis Table 4. Descriptives statistics table Paste table below: Descriptive Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Mean_heart_rate_ BPM

Body_weight_Kg 85.391 13.9322 11

results that is not the case. This can be used practically to help determine why some people have a higher heart rate than others and how those with higher heart rates can potentially lower theirs. II. Bivariate Regression Research question: “ What is the relationship between mean heart rate and body weight?” Assumptions Testing

  1. Data level of measurement- what is the level of measurement for the data used in this case study? ______________________________________________________________
  2. Would the amount of skewness and kurtosis in these variables affect the analysis? How do you know? Give numerical values to support your conclusion.

    **Table 1. Table with skewness and kurtosis** Paste table below: 

3. Was the assumption of normality met and how do you know? ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Table 2. Tests of normality Paste table below:

#’s 1-3 are the same as previously posted

Figure 1. Histogram with normal curve for each variable Paste figure below: Figure 2. Normal Q-Q plot for each variable Paste figure below:

  1. Were there any outliers; how do you know?

    **Table 3. Box-and-Whiskers plot for each variable** Paste table below: 

SAME AS PREVIOUS

Statistical Analysis Table 4. Descriptives statistics table Paste table below: Descriptive Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Mean_heart_rate_ BPM

Body_weight_Kg 85.391 13.9322 11 Table 5. Correlations table Paste table below: Correlations Mean_heart rate_BPM Body_weigh t_Kg Pearson Correlation Mean_heart_rate BPM

Body_weight_Kg -.705 1. Sig. (1-tailed) Mean_heart_rate_ BPM

Body_weight_Kg..

Table 8. The coefficients table Use this table to type out the regression equation for this data. Paste table below: Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficientst Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Collinearity Statistics B Std. Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound Tolerance VIF 1 (Constant) 201.264 23.384 8.607. 148.366 254. Body_weight_Kg -.808 .271 -.705 -2.986. -1.420 -.196 1.000 1. a. Dependent Variable: Mean_heart_rate_BPM Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. 95.0% Co B Std. Error Beta Lower Bou 1 (Constant) 201.264 23.384 8.607 .000 148. Body_weight_K g

a. Dependent Variable: Mean_heart_rate_BPM Y= a + bX Y= 201.264+-.

Write-up (8 sentence maximum) Include the following items:

  1. What is the research question?
  2. What is the Pearson correlation value, and is it statistically significant (hint: what is the “ p -value”)?
  3. Is there a positive or negative relationship between the two variables, and how did you come to that conclusion?
  4. What is the regression equation for these data?
  5. What are your thoughts on the finding of this analysis, and what are the practical application(s) of this finding? The research question is whether or not there is a correlation between mean heart and bowdy weight. The Pearson correlation for this set of data is - .705, (p<.001), which indicates a strong significance level, which is also shown by the sig. of .015. There is a negative relationship between the 2 values because the p value is negative, and the skewness and kurtosis of body way was violated because it was too much. The regression equation for this data is Y=201.264+-.808. The findings are interesting, I’ve always thought that body weight played a big role in mean heart rate, but according to these results that is not the case. This can be used practically to help determine why some people have a higher heart rate than others, and how those with higher heart rates can potentially lower theirs.