








Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
if you're struggling for looking for a reviewer in ethics this can help. This contains all the topics covered in the course which may be relevant to you as your study notes.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 14
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Introduction to Research Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki Belmont Report Ethical Concerns in Research Evidence-Based Practice Ethico-Moral Obligations of the Nurse in Evidence-Based Practices INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH (LESSON 1) What is research? ‒ Scientific methods are used to carefully study a certain issue or research problem. ‒ Involves Inductive(qualitative) and Deductive(quantitative) method. ‒ Earl Robert Babbie, an American sociologist, ‒ said, "Research is a systematic inquiry to describe, explain, predict, and control the observed phenomenon." ‒ It uses both intuitive and deductive reasoning. Phases in Research Where to get Human Samples from People for Research?
‒ The Republic Act No. 10532, or the Philippine National Health Research System Act of 2013, Mandates that all health and health- related research should adhere to the guidelines of the Philippine Health Research Ethics Board (PHREB) (Philippine National Health Research System, 2013). ‒ Philippine Health Research Ethics Board (PHREB) Adopts the WHO definition of health “A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” Thus, studies involving human subjects conducted in the country, including human population genetic research, are within its purview, even if not necessarily medical in scope. “must undergo ethical review and clearance before implementation to ensure the safety, dignity, and well-being of research participants” Informed Consent in Research ‒ Researchers must obtain the voluntary, informed consent of individuals participating in their studies. ‒ A key principle of ethical human subjects study is getting informed consent. Researchers must make sure that people who want to take part in the study get information about it that is detailed enough to allow them to make an informed decision and presented in a way that makes it easy for them to choose not to participate. This includes providing detailed information about the: Purpose, Procedures, Risks, and benefits of the research, Ensuring that participants have the capacity to understand and make an informed decision. Why is Informed Consent important in a study? (National Human Genome, 2022) ‒ In the United States, the requirements for obtaining informed consent from research participants are stipulated by several regulations and policies. ‒ Informed Consent= “Common Rule.” 1930 – The origin of modern regulations for informed consent in the U.S., when Nazi physicians conducted horrific experiments on human subjects without their consent before and during WWII. A set of 10 ethical principles for physicians and researchers to follow when conducting experimentation on humans, one of which was informed consent. ‒ With limited exceptions, the Common Rule Mandates that researchers obtain informed consent for federally funded research that involves "a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research: Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens." ‒ Not all research that involves human samples or data requires informed consent. ‒ According to the current definition of "human subject" in the Common Rule, Informed consent is not required for use of samples and data that do not identify the person/donor (such as those stored in biobanks and data repositories for future research use) or Informed consent is not required for use of samples and data from people who are deceased. Human Subjects Research ‒ Grants and Funding in the Philippines ‒ Stages of basic academic research among Philippine Indigenous cultural communities/ Indigenous peoples (ICC/IPs) (Jae Joseph Russell B. Rodriguez, 2022)
‒ Several other documents further expanded upon the principles outlined in the Nuremberg Code, including the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report and the Common Rule. ‒ The goal has always been - and always will be to conduct ethical clinical trials and protect human subjects. CONCLUSION In any experiment/ research involving human experiments, the researcher must make sure that the individuals understand and consent to participate voluntarily. The outcome of the research should benefit the participants and researchers must be scientifically qualified. Participants are free to withdraw any time during the course of research, and researchers have the obligation to stop the study as soon as they observe that continuation could be fatal.
The Helsinki Declaration of 1964 issued guidelines on medical research. ‒ The Declaration of Helsinki was created in 1964 by the World Medical Association (WMA). The WMA was established seventeen years before in 1947, and was created to handle the growing concern of unethical medical practice which became more apparent during and after World War II. ‒ Therefore, the Declaration of Helsinki is an ethical guideline, rather than a document with international legal implications. The Declaration set the standard for ethical human experimentation conducted by researchers. ‒ The Declaration of Helsinki has been revised six times, in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000, and 2008. The fifth revision, in 2000, caused considerable controversy regarding issues such as whether the document should be revised at all, the restating of Article 29 which dealt with placebo use, and what the medical community should be required to do to treat patients after they have undergone a medical trial. ‒ After this revision, the U.S. FDA refused to refer to the new version and instead continued using the document from 1989. In 2006, the U.S. FDA discontinued referring to the Declaration at all. Also, the European Commission only uses an older version from 1996. This lack of cohesion has weakened the Declaration of Helsinki’s influence over the years. However, it is still viewed as a pioneering effort to ensure that patients involved in clinical trials are treated with the fairness around the world. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human subjects and protect their health and rights. No national or international ethical, legal or regulatory requirement should reduce or eliminate any of the protections for research subjects set forth in this Declaration. Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted only by individuals with the appropriate ethics and scientific education, training and qualifications. Appropriate compensation and treatment for subjects who are harmed as a result of participating in research must be ensured. BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS OF RESEARCH SUBJECTS
National Research Act (Pub. L. 93-348) Enacted on July 12, 1974, establishing the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Commission was tasked with identifying ethical principles and developing guidelines for biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects. In carrying out the above, the Commission was directed to consider: (i) The boundaries between biomedical and behavioral research and the accepted and routine practice of medicine (ii) The role of assessment of risk- benefit criteria in the determination of the appropriateness of research involving human subjects (iii) Appropriate guidelines for the selection of human subjects for participation in such research and (iv) The nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings. BELMONT REPORT ‒ Written by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research ‒ Developed from discussions at the Belmont Conference Center in February 1976 and four years of monthly Commission deliberations. ‒ Identifies basic ethical principles and guidelines that address ethical issues arising from the conduct of research with human subjects PRIORITY: Welfare of Clients/Subjects ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INCLUDING HUMAN SUBJECTS Three principles, or general prescriptive judgments, that are relevant to research involving human subjects are identified in this statement. These three are comprehensive, however, and are stated at a level of generalization that should assist scientists, subjects, reviewers and interested citizens to understand the ethical issues inherent in research involving human subjects. These principles cannot always be applied so as to resolve beyond dispute particular ethical problems. The objective is to provide an analytical framework that will guide the resolution of ethical problems arising from research involving human subjects. BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PRACTICE AND RESEARCH a. PRACTICE ‒ Refers to interventions that are designed solely to enhance the well-being of an individual patient or client and that have a reasonable expectation of success. ‒ The purpose of medical or behavioral practice is to provide diagnosis, preventive treatment or therapy to particular individuals. b. RESEARCH ‒ Designates an activity designed to test an hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (expressed, for example, in theories, principles, and statements of relationships). ‒ It is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach that objective. BASIC ETHICAL PRINCIPLES Respect for Persons (Informed Consent) Right to Full Disclosure Right to Self- Determination Beneficence Do no harm Risk-Benefit Assessment Justice Privacy/Confidentiality Fair Treatment RESPECT FOR PERSONS 2 ethical convictions:
‒ Persons are treated in an ethical manner not only by respecting their decisions and protecting them from harm, but also by making efforts to secure their well-being. ‒ The term "beneficence" is often understood to cover acts of kindness or charity that go beyond strict obligation. ‒ In this document, beneficence is understood in a stronger sense, as an obligation. 2 general rules:
Ethics in nursing research can be defined as the act of moral principles that the researcher has to follow while conducting nursing research to ensure the rights and welfare of the individuals. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IN RESEARCH
1. BENEFICENCE ‒ Promoting good or doing good ‒ One of the most fundamental ethical principle 2. RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM HARM ANF DISCOMFORT ‒ Researchers have the obligation to avoid or minimize harm in studies with humans Physical harm Social harm Emotional harm Financial harm 3. RESPECT FOR HUMAN DIGNITY ‒ Includes “right to self- determination” and “right to full disclosure” Autonomy A patient/participant has the right to make decision about his/her care 3.1 RIGHT TO FULL DISCLOSURE ‒ The researcher has fully described the nature of the study. ‒ Self-determination and Right to full disclosure are the 2 major elements of INFORMED CONSENT 4. JUSTICE ‒ The right to fair treatment and their right to privacy ‒ The risks and benefits should be equally divided Participants should not be chosen based on gender, religion, wealth, or any other differentiator. ‒ Human subjects are essential to the conduct of research intended to improve human health. As such, the relationship between investigators and human subjects is critical and should be based on honesty, trust, and respect. **BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS OF RESEARCH SUBJECTS
‒ Combination of scientific evidence, patient preferences, and clinician expertise when making decisions for patient care. ‒ It leads to the “development of best practices to meet the need of clients efficiently and effectively” (Carter, Mastro, Vose, Rivera, & Larson, 2017) 3 MAIN COMPONENTS OF EVIDENCE- BASED PRACTICE
Review of Definitions: MORALITY AND ETHICS Morality ‒ Refers to “traditions or beliefs about right and wrong conduct” and is influenced by social and cultural practices. It is what a person has been taught within society and her or his own culture. Ethics ‒ Is “the study of social morality.” It is how a person makes judgments between right and wrong. WHAT IS EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE? ‒ Evidenced-based practice (EBP) is applying or translating research findings in our daily patient care practices and clinical decision-making. ‒ EBP also involves integrating the best available evidence with clinical knowledge and expertise, while considering patients’ unique needs and personal preferences. If used consistently, optimal patient outcomes are more likely to be achieved. ‒ Using EBP means abandoning outdated care delivery practices and choosing effective, scientifically validated methods to meet individual patient needs. Health care providers who use EBP must be skilled at discerning the value of research for their specific patient population. BEFORE THERE WAS EVIDENCE... ‒ As health care providers, delivery of patient care should stimulate questions about the evidence behind our daily practice. ‒ For instance, there was a time when neutropenic patients were placed in strict isolation to protect them from developing life-threatening infections. Research findings were evaluated for best evidence and it was noted that using strict isolation precautions did not result in more favorable patient outcomes when compared to proper handwashing procedures coupled with standard precautions—and it seemed that we unnecessarily subjected patients to the negative psychological effects caused by extreme isolation. ‒ As clinicians, we sometimes follow outdated policies or practices without questioning their relevance, accuracy, or the evidence that supports their continued use. WHAT IS ETHICO-MORAL RESPONSIBILITY OF NURSES? The ethical principles that nurses must adhere to are the principles of: Justice Beneficence Non-maleficence Accountability Fidelity Autonomy Veracity WHAT IS A MORAL OBLIGATION IN NURSING? ‒ “The nurse’s primary commitment is to the recipient of nursing and health care services...” (ANA, 2015, p.5); ‒ However, in certain situations the risks of harm may outweigh a nurse’s moral obligation or duty to care for a given patient. HOW CAN YOU ENSURE AN ETHICO- MORAL NURSING PRACTICE? ‒ Organize an ethics committee or identify ethical champions in everyday life. Develop ethics-friendly policies and procedures. ‒ Provide continuing education and training in ethical decision making ‒ Promote open discussions among staff nurses and managers regarding ethical patient care. BENEFITS OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING Besides keeping health care practices relevant and current, evidence-based practice in nursing offers a range of other benefits to the nurse and the patients: ‒ Promotes positive patient outcomes ‒ Reduces health care costs by preventing complications ‒ Contributes to the growth of the science of nursing ‒ Allows for incorporation of new technologies into health care practice Increases nurse autonomy and confidence in decision-making ‒ Ensures relevancy of nursing practice with new interventions and care protocols ‒ Provides scientifically supported research to help make well- informed decisions
‒ Fosters shared decision-making with patients in care planning Enhances critical thinking ‒ Encourages lifelong learning CONCLUSION When you use the principles of evidence-based practice in nursing to make decisions about your patient's care, it results in better outcomes, higher satisfaction, and reduced costs. Implementing this method promotes lifelong learning and lets you strive for continuous quality improvement in your clinical care and nursing practice to achieve nursing excellence.