Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice in Environmental Economics, Slides of Environmental Economics

An in-depth analysis of cap and trade, an economic instrument used to control pollution through market-based mechanisms. The theory behind cap and trade is explained, including its creation of a market for the right to pollute, efficiency and effectiveness requirements, initial allocation of permits, and the role of auctions and free allocations. Real-world examples, such as the u.s. Sulfur oxide program, illustrate the practical applications and benefits of cap and trade, including cost savings, flexibility, and technological innovation.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/29/2013

divakar
divakar 🇮🇳

4.1

(25)

72 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics
Economic Incentive
Instruments (continued)
•Marketable Emissions Permits
Cap and Trade
Emission Reduction Credits (ERC)
Cap and Trade—
Theory
Dales –1960 Proposed—
Officials do not need to know abatement
costs
Get a cost minimizing solution
Modest monitoring burdens for
regulators
Although can have high transaction costs
for regulated
Promotes technological innovation
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice in Environmental Economics and more Slides Environmental Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Environmental Economics Environmental Economics

Economic Incentive

Instruments (continued)

  • Marketable Emissions Permits
    • Cap and Trade
    • Emission Reduction Credits (ERC)

Cap and Trade—

Theory

  • Dales –1960 Proposed—
  • Officials do not need to know abatement costs
  • Get a cost minimizing solution
  • Modest monitoring burdens for regulators
  • Although can have high transaction costs for regulated
  • Promotes technological innovation

Cap and Trade--Theory

  • Creates a market for the right to pollute
  • Outcomes similar to taxes and subsidies approach but works in terms of quantities and not prices

Cap and Trade—Theory

  • To be efficient and effective =
  • Must have a property rights

structure that supports trading

Cap and Trade--

Theory

  • Total Quantity to be Allowed (e.g. The Cap) (must be constraining)
  • Rule: All polluters must have permits for quantity of their emitted pollution
  • Monitoring and Effective Penalties (Penalties are greater than permit prices)

Cap and Trade—Initial

Allocation of Permits

  • Auction permits
  • Free initial allocation on arbitrary

basis

Cap and Trade—Initial

Allocation of Permits

  • In a well functioning competitive market, same market price would emerge from either allocation method
  • Monopolization leads to strategic behavior
  • Allocation methods will differ as to their impact on income and wealth and agency revenue generation

Cap and Trade—Compared

with Conventional Markets

  • Environmental Goods and Services Markets differ from Conventional Goods and Service Markets
  • Buyers are not knowledgeable what is being traded
  • Demand is driven by regulatory requirements of a cap

Cap and Trade—

Compared with

Conventional Markets

  • Supply is determined by what regulators say can be exchanged
  • Quality consciousness is only as good as required by regulator
  • Three parties—demanders, suppliers, and regulators

Cap and Trade—Point

Source Example

  • U.S.—Sulfur Oxide (SO 2 ) Emission Trading
  • Established 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
  • Goal: Reduce emissions by half or 10 million tons
  • 9 million tons worth of permits issued
  • Target was electricity sector

U.S. Sulfur Oxide

Program

  • Anyone can buy permits
  • Penalties set at $2000 a ton
  • Original estimates of probable

permit prices were as high at $

  • Prices actually were much lower than

predicted—as low now as $

Tietenberg– Other

Countries?

  • Do they have sufficient

organizational resources and capacity

to use cap and trade?

  • Property right structure matters
  • Chile-Santiago industrial air point

sources of particulates

Stavins-Lessons

  • Point of control
  • Information needs and costs
  • Initial allocation of permits