Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

ECON 2J03 - Environmental Economics – Midterm EXAM_ 2025/26., Exams of Environmental Economics

ECON 2J03 - Environmental Economics – Midterm EXAM_ 2025/26. McMaster University ECON 2J03

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 05/29/2025

elam-dennis
elam-dennis 🇨🇦

12 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ECON 2J03 - Environmental Economics Midterm EXAM_ 2025/26.
Resources devoted to monitoring the behaviour of firms,
agencies, and individuals subject to environmental
regulations are called
.
Question 1 options:
a) abatement costs
b) enforcement costs
Suppose a manufacturing firm that is about to be regulated
faces the following actual and potential production costs: 1)
$2,500 before regulation; 2) $2,925 in the future without
the regulation; and 3) $3,240 in the future with the
regulation. The before/after cost of the regulation is
and the with/without cost of the regulation is
.
a) $425; $740
b) $425; $315
c) $740; $315
When environmental regulation of an entire industry results
in output adjustments, the social cost of the regulation can
be measured by the changes in consumer and producer
surpluses.
True
When supply and demand are linear curves, the incidence of
the tax depends on the slopes of the demand and supply
curves.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download ECON 2J03 - Environmental Economics – Midterm EXAM_ 2025/26. and more Exams Environmental Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

ECON 2J03 - Environmental Economics – Midterm EXAM_ 2025/26.

Resources devoted to monitoring the behaviour of firms,

agencies, and individuals subject to environmental

regulations are called.

Question 1 options: a) abatement costs b) enforcement costs

Suppose a manufacturing firm that is about to be regulated

faces the following actual and potential production costs: 1)

$2,500 before regulation; 2) $2,925 in the future without

the regulation; and 3) $3,240 in the future with the

regulation. The before/after cost of the regulation is

and the with/without cost of the regulation is.

a) $425; $ b) $425; $ c) $740; $

When environmental regulation of an entire industry results

in output adjustments, the social cost of the regulation can

be measured by the changes in consumer and producer

surpluses.

True

When supply and demand are linear curves, the incidence of

the tax depends on the slopes of the demand and supply

curves.

True

Refer to Table below. If the with/without principle were

applied to estimate the change in cost due to a new

environmental regulation, the added costs due to the new

regulation would be.

Production costs before the regulation $ 200 Production costs in the future, without the regulation $ 250 Production costs in the future, with the regulation $ 290 Question 5 options: a) $ b) $

Enforcement costs for new protective programs include

Question 6 options: a) resources devoted to monitoring the behavior of firms.

Refer to the Figure below. Panel (a) and Panel (b)

represent industries that have experienced cost increases

due to environmental regulations. Assume that both price

increases are equivalent. Which panel reflects less impact

on the consumer and a large industry adjustment, in terms

of less output?

Question 8 options: a) p 2 x r1. b) (d + e + f).

The change in consumer surplus resulting from an increase

in environmental quality (a public good) can be measured in

the same way as the change in consumer surplus for a

private good

Question 9 options: True

The practice of estimating willingness to accept

Question 10 options: a) asks how much compensation people require for a reduction in environmental quality.

For a firm with more than one source of emissions, the

states that the total costs of abating a given

abatement target will be minimized when the marginal

costs of abatement are across sources.

Question 11 options:

The height of the marginal damage curve at a particular

level of emissions shows how much total damages change if

there is a small change in the quantity of emissions.

Question 12 options:

Refer to Figure below. Total damages associated with

damage curve MD 2 at an emissions level of e 1 is.

Question 13 options: a) $ b) area a c) area b a) equimarginal principle; equalized True d) area a + b

Question 17 options: a) 0 b) 48 units c) $ 192.

Low-phosphate detergents, mercury-free thermometers and

energy-efficient appliances are all examples of.

Question 18 options: a) pollution-intensive goods b) low-carbon goods c) environmentally friendly goods

A living resource can become non-renewable if the rate of

harvest exceeds the growth rate of the resource's stock.

Question 19 options: True

Economists believe people pollute because

Question 20 options: a) people don't care b) people have too many options for their time c) governments are filled with corruption d) pollution is the cheapest waste disposal method of waste products

Climate change models have predicted an increase in the

earth's temperature, greater climate variability and more

extreme weather events in the 21 st^ century if greenhouse

gas emissions from human activity continue to be emitted

at their current pace.

Question 21 options:

Many environmental issues are local or regional; however,

some are international or global in scope. An example of a

global environmental issue is.

Question 22 options: a) destruction of the stratospheric zone b) greenhouse gases c) global warming

Positive economics is the study of.

Question 23 options: a) what will be b) what is c) beneficial economic outcomes

What are some of the issues with Hedonic estimation?

Question 24 options: a) Distortion of housing markets and prices due to too few sales b) It is not easy to measure environmental quality c) Environmental quality is a subjective matter

In surveys and experimental work where people are asked

to compare gains and losses relative to a reference point,

True d) all of the above d) economic outcomes that are most likely d) all of the above

In scenario that tax does not exist, 180 - 2Qd =40+2Qs Thus, Q=35, Pc=Pp= In scenario that tax exists, 180 - 2Q- 40 - 2Q = 8, Thus, Q = 33, Pc = 180 - 233 = 114, Pp = 40 + 233 = 106 We can calculate that incidence on consumers is 114 - 110 = And incidence on producers is 110 - 106 = 4

The following equations represent the inverse supply and demand

functions in the market for Good A:

PC = 160 - 3QD PP = 20 + 2QS

where PC and PP are the prices paid by consumers and received by

producers respectively. QD and QS are the quantities demanded and

supplied, respectively. Suppose the government imposes a tax of $

per unit of Good A. What is the incidence of this tax on consumers

and producers?

when there is no tax, 160 - 3Qd=20+2Qs Q=28, Pc=Pp= when government imposes tax of $5, 160 - 3Qd- 20 - 2Qs=5, Q=27, Pc=160-327=79, Pp=20+227= Incidence of tax on consumers=79-76= incidence of tax on producers=76-74=

Assume reductions in the amount of ground level ozone

shift the marginal cost of producing alfalfa from MC 1 = 35 +

2QS to MC 2 = 35 + 0.5QS. Use the producer surplus to

estimate the maximum amount alfalfa producers would be

willing to pay for this improvement in the air quality if the

market price of alfalfa is $50/unit of output.

Before shift, 50=35+2Q, Q=7.5, producer surplus=0.5(50-35)7.5=56. After shift, 50=35+0.5Q, Q=30, producer surplus=0.5(50-35)30= The difference is the maximum amount alfalfa required by the question, which is 225 - 56.25=168.

Assume reductions in the amount of ground level ozone shift the

marginal cost of producing alfalfa from MC 1 = 30 + 2QS to MC 2 = 30

+ 0.5QS. Use the producer surplus to estimate the maximum amount

alfalfa producers would be willing to pay for this improvement in the

air quality if the market price of alfalfa is $40/unit of output.

if no shift, 30+2Qs=40, Q=5, producer surplus=0.5(40-30)5= if there is shift, 30+0.5Qs=40, Q=20, producer surplus=0.5(40-30)20= maximum amount producer willing to pay=100-25=

76 - 0.5Q=4+Q

Q=

socially efficient output: 76 - 0.5Q=4+Q+ Q=

Suppose there are three firms in the market for a certain

good. Firm 1's marginal cost equation is MC = 4 + 0.25QS,

firm 2's marginal cost equation is MC = 0.5QS and firm 3's

marginal cost equation is MC = 2 + QS. What is the

aggregate supply equation for this market?

Firm 1 can be rewritten to: Qs= 4P– 16 Firm 2: Qs=2P Firm 3: Qs=P– 2 aggregate supply equation for this market: Qs=7P– 18

Suppose there are three firms in the market for a certain good. Firm

1's marginal cost equation is MC = 6 + 0.5QS, firm 2's marginal cost

equation is MC = 0.25QS and firm 3's marginal cost equation is MC =

4 + QS. What is the aggregate supply equation for this market?

P=6+0.5Q - > Q = 2 P- 12

P=0.25Q - > Q=4P

  • P=4+Q - > Q=P-
  • aggregate supply equation: Qs=2P-12+4P+P-4=7P-