

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of the 'good life' from the perspectives of various philosophers, including plato, aristotle, kant, and nietzsche. It delves into the different definitions and components of the good life, highlighting the diverse views on what constitutes a fulfilling and meaningful existence. The document also examines the role of happiness as the ultimate goal of the good life, and how various philosophical schools of thought, such as materialism, hedonism, stoicism, theism, and humanism, have approached this concept. Through this comprehensive analysis, the document aims to provide a deeper understanding of the complexities and nuances involved in defining and achieving the good life.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
The meaning of good life may differ from person to person. Your friend may see good life as being wealthy. Your cousin may comprehend it as having a complete and happy family. The smartest classmate of yours may understand it as getting recognition and reaching dreams. The old man in your neighbor may thought it as fulfilled life. To them, this good life is perhaps one of the fantasies of humans. Though the works of philosophers for the past hundred years may seem separated from earthly desires, this is not always true. Philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Nietzsche once made the understanding of good life as the center of their philosophy.
Plato
Plato once said, "the unexamined life is not worth living." In typical ancient Greek fashion, Plato and his mentor Socrates define the good life in terms of reasonable restraint and civic duty. They believed that an individual become a master of himself using his reason to reign in his passions, as well as doing what he can to help promote the stability of his community. Plato also claims that despite the reality of change, things remain, and they restrain their ultimate "whatness" – these concepts were explained by Plato through the two aspects of reality which are world of matter (changing and impermanent) and world of forms (real entities).
Aristotle
Aristotle disagreed with his teacher, Plato, for he believed that there is no reality over and above what the senses can perceive. As such, it is only by observation of the external world that one can truly understand what reality is all about. Change is a process that is inherent in things. We, along with all other entities in the world, start entails change. Every human person aspires for an end. This end, as what we have learned from the previous module, is happiness or human flourishing. No one – male or female, young or old, curly or straight, poor or wealthy – resists happiness. We all want to be happy. Aristotle claim that happiness is the end of everything that we do.
Immanuel Kant
Kant describes happiness as "continuous well-being, enjoyment of life, complete satisfaction with one's condition." He refers to man's preservation and welfare as synonymous with his happiness. In the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant defines happiness as "the state of a rational being in the world
in the whole of whose existence everything goes according to his wish and will." Happiness is not pleasure. It is not the virtuous, joyful feeling associated with living a moral life, rather, happiness is simple getting what you want.
Friedrich Nietzsche
For Nietzsche, life is best affirmed by a striving for individual excellence that he identified with an idealized aristocracy. Despite his contempt for traditional morality, Nietzsche did not seek to replace it with universal prescriptions, but rather to undermine our confidence in all such notions of universality. Nietzsche attempts to disrupt old conceptual schemes, in order to encourage us to think for ourselves. To love your fate is to know that everything that has happened in your life; the good, the bad, and the ugly, has contributed to who you are and what you are doing at this very moment. To embrace any part of life, says Nietzsche, thus necessitates that you embrace all of it. Trying to create yourself will lead to some failures but embracing those failures alongside your successes can help re-spark a love of life and can help you see the meaning in even the worst moments.
Are you living a good and happy life? It was said that the mission of life is to end the miseries of material existence and attain a blissful life. Admit it or not, we are constantly chasing after life, but we often fail in our pursuit. I'm sure that all of us have experiences failure, sadness and rejection. We may get a glimpse of happiness, but it does not last forever. Most of us, if not all, do not want miseries; however, we cannot avoid it.
The ethical is meant to lead us to the good and happy life. Through the ages, as has been discussed in the previous modules, man has constantly struggled with the external world in order to reach human flourishing. History has given birth to different schools of thought, all of which aim for the good and happy life.
| Philosophy | Description | | --- | --- | | Materialism | The first materialists were the atomists in Ancient Greece. Democritus and Leucippus led a school whose primary belief is that the world is made up of and is controlled by the tiny indivisible units in the world called atomos or seeds. For them, the world, including human beings, is made up of matter. As such, only material entities matter. In terms of human flourishing, matter is what makes us attain happiness. The hedonists, for their part, see the end goal of life in acquiring pleasure. For them, pleasure has always been the priority; and life is about obtaining and indulging in pleasure because life is limited. Hedonists strongly believe in the quote "Eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die." This philosophy, just like materialism, rejects the notion of afterlife. | | Stoicism | The school of thought led by Epicurus, the stoics espoused the idea that in order to be happy one must learn to distance oneself and be apathetic. Apatheia means to be indifferent. For the,