


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Using critical reading as a form of reasoning
Typology: Summaries
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
What is Critical Reading? It is engaging in analytic activity which involves the reader by asking questions about the text and the author’s claim. Critical readers are doing the process of evaluating, analyzing, and interpreting the assertion of the hidden meaning of the whole text resulting in enhanced clarity and comprehension. While reasoning as defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary is an act of giving statements for justification and explanation. Someone can defend something by giving out reasons. Therefore, when reading critically, it is necessary to question the different arguments used by the author, as any problem can weaken the authenticity of the conclusion. Remember that Critical reading is not meant to criticize but to assess the validity of textual evidence. Steps Used in Critical Reading as Reasoning by Maxine Rafaella C. Rodriguez and Marella Therese A. Tiongson
What questions can you ask about the claims? Which details in the text answer your questions? What are the most important details in the paragraph? What is each one’s relationship to the claim? What details do you find interesting? Why so? What are some claims that do not seem to have support? What kinds of support could they be provided with? What are some details that you find questionable? Why do you think so? Are some details outdated, inaccurate, exaggerated, or taken out of context? Are sources reliable? The following are the characteristics of good evidence: unified relevant to the central point specific and concrete accurate and representative or typical Example You are asking your father for an Android cellphone , that is your claim. Then your father answers you. “No, you can’t!” this is his counterclaim. He might say that you already have a cellphone. Therefore, when you are going to formulate a reason for the counterclaim, you should state the reason why you are asking for an Android cellphone. You might say that you could use it in your online classes because an Android cellphone would be very useful in this new normal classroom setup. When you write your counterclaim, you are expressing unfavorable statements. Therefore, it is needed to use hedges words or phrases to be able to give a courteous tone. Different forms of hedges (you avoid answering a question or committing yourself to a particular action or decision) Modals: may, could, would, should, might, certain, must, etc. Frequency adverbs: usually, generally, commonly Probability adverbs: probably, possibly, presumably Example: The common cold is caused by a virus. With hedges: The common cold must be caused by a virus. The common virus is certain to be caused by a virus. Activity 1 Identify whether the following statements indicate critical reading or not. Write C if it involves critical reading and N if not. 2 points each.
First things first, the public must acknowledge that teenage pregnancy is a problem. The Philippine National Nutrition Council has said teenage pregnancy has negative consequences, and the most affected are teenage mothers. It said “early childbearing may result in poor health outcomes and may be a threat to the country’s economic growth. Pregnant adolescents are less likely to complete higher education and have lesser ability to earn more income over the course of a lifetime, causing economic losses to the country.” During the recent Senate Committee on Women, Children, Family Relations and Gender Equality hearing, senators learned that the Philippine Statistics Authority recorded 2,113 births of young girls aged 10-14 in 2020. A year later, this number increased to 2,299 births, according to the Department of Health data. Sen. Risa Hontiveros has pushed anew for the passage of the Prevention of Teenage Pregnancy Bill, because “adolescent pregnancy has deprived many girls of an education, of job opportunities, of a future.” A teen parent, Carmela Bondoc, said during the hearing that it is important for young moms like her to receive culturally sensitive, age- and development-appropriate adolescent and health education. “Edukasyon na tamang gagabay sa amin. Impormasyon na galing sa mga health professionals. Impormasyong tama. Impormasyong hindi ipagkakait sa amin ng dahil sa panghuhusga. Edukasyong nagbibigay ng dignidad sa aming desisyon para sa sarili (Education that will guide us properly. Information from health professionals. Correct information. Information that will not be withheld from us because of discrimination. Education that gives dignity to our decision for self),” she said. Education indeed is the best tool to address the teenage pregnancy problem of the country. And it is high time to include the subject on reproductive health in the Philippine education system. An informed youth is one of the country’s best assets. Senators Padilla and Tulfo should reconsider their stance as restricting social media access has a serious legal question—implementing it could violate the right of Filipinos, adults and non-adults, to free speech. Tapping the wide reach of social media sites is one of the best tools for educating teenagers about the perils of teenage pregnancy. Restricting teenagers’ access to them could further put themselves in the dark.