


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The legal framework surrounding administrative searches and information collection, focusing on criminal law searches, administrative searches, and the role of warrants, consent, and the fourth amendment. Topics include the plain view exception, hot pursuit exception, administrative exclusionary rule, and reporting requirements.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Chapter 8 - Administrative Information Collection
Review of criminal law searches
What does the 4th^ amendment require for a search warrant? What is the plain view exception? What is the hot pursuit exception? Do you need a warrant if the person consents to the search?
Remember this for Burger
What is the remedy if the prosecutor wants to use evidence obtained without a necessary warrant? What is the remedy problem if you client suffers an illegal search but is not prosecuted?
Administrative Searches
Why did Frank say that traditional public health and safety inspections did not trigger 4th^ Amendment warrant requirements? What is the key distinction that the courts use to determine whether a search is a criminal law search or an administrative law search?
How is it that the Guantanamo detainees are administrative detainees, rather than criminal law detainees?
What were the See and Camara Courts concerns that lead to their modifying the Frank rule?
The See Court created the notion of an area warrant.
What are area warrants used for? How do they differ from criminal law warrants? Be specific about specificity and probable cause. Give examples of factors that might be used to justify an area warrant.
When did the See court tell us that even area warrants would not be necessary?
What are examples?
New York v. Burger , 482 U.S. 691 (1987)
What are the basics facts in Burger? What was defendant’s argument that the evidence obtained in the search should be excluded from his criminal prosecution? What are the Burger factors for deciding if a business is pervasively
regulated? How do warrant requirements differ for these businesses? What is the rationale for why warrants are not necessary for pervasively regulated businesses? What does the statute or regulation have to provide to be an adequate substitute for a 4th^ amendment warrant? What is the role of the expectation of privacy in deciding if a warrant is necessary to use evidence in subsequent criminal proceedings? How can licensing and permits meet the Burger factors and allow warrantless searches?
What are the issues when an administrative search, such as a restaurant inspection, turns up evidence of an unrelated crime - say the health inspector finds the cook's cocaine stash?
What did Frank tell us? Why would allowing this undermine the rationale for area warrants? Would it matter where the cocaine was found, i.e., in the meat freezer versus the restaurant’s business office?
Administrative exclusionary rule
Can OSHA enter a business for an inspection without a warrant? Assume OSHA has a warrant for a limited search, but goes beyond the limits of the warrant?
What can the evidence found in this ex-warrant search be used for? What use did the court exclude?
Silver Platter Doctrine
(NB – you may have heard in a criminal law class that the SPD is no longer good law. That refers to an older interpretation that allowed state police to give illegally obtained evidence to the feds, who could then use it. That inter-sovereign SPD is no longer good law. The private party version is still good law.) What is the Silver Platter Doctrine in criminal law? What are the limits on the doctrine, i.e., what keeps the police from just asking your neighbor to break into your house and look for evidence? In the context of private data aggregators such as Equifax and Facebook, how does the Silver Platter Doctrine undermine constitutional protections? How might you argue that there are constitutional limits on the use of third party aggregator data in criminal prosecutions?
Do you think it matters whether individuals consent to or even know about third party data aggregation?
Are there any constitutional limits on the administrative use of data from third party aggregators?
Corporations may be people, but can a corporation take the 5 th^ , i.e., claim the privilege against self-incrimination? Is forcing your client to give a blood sample a self-incrimination issue?
If not, what is it?
Why doesn’t self-incrimination apply in administrative proceeding?
What is the usual result if your client claims a 5th amendment privilege in an administrative proceeding and refuses to testify? If your client does provide the testimony, may it be used against him in a criminal proceeding? What the circumstances when a criminal court might exclude testimony provided in an administrative proceeding?
How can the DA or the court cure self-incrimination conflicts?
What is the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act?
What are the legal consequences if an agency covered by the act does not comply with it in promulgating a data collection form?