Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Civil Procedure PH Syllabus, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

The content of this document includes Civil Procedure PH Syllabus

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2023/2024

Available from 06/30/2025

rommel-roy-romanillos
rommel-roy-romanillos 🇵🇭

298 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Civil Procedure 1 Syllabus
ATTY. JOSEPH C. LADLAD
Coverage:
a. Rules 1 to 39 of the Rules of Court (with 2019 and 2024 amendments)
b. BP 129 as amended by RA 11576 (for Venue and Subject Matter Jurisdiction)
c. Rules on Expedited Procedures in First Level Courts (summary procedure and
small claims)
d. Assigned Jurisprudence
e. Pertinent Provisions of the Constitution
f. Katarungang Pambarangay Law (who/what needs to undergo prior barangay
amicable settlement; exceptions)
g. Supreme Court A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC (Now Rule 13-A) Interim Rule on the
Electronic Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments, and other Papers in
Civil Cases
h. Additional cases as we go
Teaching Methodology:
- Mixed recitations and lectures. Expect assignments, quizzes, midterm and final
examinations.
- Both classes and exams are online. Preferably using Gmeet (use your UNC issued email
addresses).
- For exams: you need to prepare 2 devices. One device (laptop, desktop, tablet) with
Microsoft word and can convert files to PDF Format for the exam. Another device that
will show you taking the exam- a cellphone or similar device. Exam questions and answers
sent through email.
I. Preliminaries
Read: Department of Education vs San Diego et al., G.R. No. 89572, Dec 21, 1989
a. Remedial Law distinguished from substantive law
b. Prospective Effect of the Rules of Court/ Retroactive Application of Rules of Court
i. In the Matter to Declare in Contempt of Court Hon. Simeon Datumanong, G.R.
No. 150274, 4 August 2006
c. Applicability to pending actions; retroactivity
d. Rule-making power of the Supreme Court
i. Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. 30
ii. Constitution, Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5)
e. Power of the Supreme Court to suspend the Rules of Court
i. Sarmiento v. Zaratan, G.R. No. 167471, 5 February 2007
ii. Labao v. Flores, G.R. No. 187984, 15 November 2010
iii. Gios-Samar, Inc. v. DOTC, G.R. No. 217158, 12 March 2019
f. Distinctions: Civil Action, Criminal Action, and Special Proceedings
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Civil Procedure PH Syllabus and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Civil Procedure 1 Syllabus ATTY. JOSEPH C. LADLAD Coverage: a. Rules 1 to 39 of the Rules of Court (with 2019 and 2024 amendments) b. BP 129 as amended by RA 11576 (for Venue and Subject Matter Jurisdiction) c. Rules on Expedited Procedures in First Level Courts (summary procedure and small claims) d. Assigned Jurisprudence e. Pertinent Provisions of the Constitution f. Katarungang Pambarangay Law (who/what needs to undergo prior barangay amicable settlement; exceptions) g. Supreme Court A.M. No. 19- 10 - 20 - SC (Now Rule 13-A) Interim Rule on the Electronic Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments, and other Papers in Civil Cases h. Additional cases as we go Teaching Methodology:

  • Mixed recitations and lectures. Expect assignments, quizzes, midterm and final examinations.
  • Both classes and exams are online. Preferably using Gmeet (use your UNC issued email addresses).
  • For exams: you need to prepare 2 devices. One device (laptop, desktop, tablet) with Microsoft word and can convert files to PDF Format for the exam. Another device that will show you taking the exam- a cellphone or similar device. Exam questions and answers sent through email. I. Preliminaries Read: Department of Education vs San Diego et al., G.R. No. 89572, Dec 21, 1989 a. Remedial Law distinguished from substantive law b. Prospective Effect of the Rules of Court/ Retroactive Application of Rules of Court i. In the Matter to Declare in Contempt of Court Hon. Simeon Datumanong, G.R. No. 150274, 4 August 2006 c. Applicability to pending actions; retroactivity d. Rule-making power of the Supreme Court i. Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. 30 ii. Constitution, Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5) e. Power of the Supreme Court to suspend the Rules of Court i. Sarmiento v. Zaratan, G.R. No. 167471, 5 February 2007 ii. Labao v. Flores, G.R. No. 187984, 15 November 2010 iii. Gios-Samar, Inc. v. DOTC, G.R. No. 217158, 12 March 2019 f. Distinctions: Civil Action, Criminal Action, and Special Proceedings

II. General Principles a. Nature and classification of Philippine Courts b. Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies i. Spouses Gonzales v. Marmaine Realty Corp., G.R. No. 214241, January 13, 2016 c. Doctrine of non-interference or doctrine of judicial stability i. Tan v. Cinco, G.R. No. 213054, 15 June 2016 ii. Specified Contractors & Dev Inc v. Pobocan G.R. No. 212014-15, 212427-28, 212694 - 95, 212794-95, 6 December 2016 III. Jurisdiction a. Statute in force at the time of the commencement of the action i. Cang v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 105308, 25 September 1998 b. Classification of jurisdiction i. Original vs. Appellate ii. General vs. Special iii. Exclusive vs. Concurrent c. Doctrines of hierarchy of courts and continuity of jurisdiction

  • Gios-Samar, Inc. v. DOTC, G.R. No. 217158, 12 March 2019 d. Jurisdiction of various Philippine courts i. Katarungang Pambarangay (Sec. 399-422, Local Government Code)
  • Condition Precedent
  • See also Art. 151, Family Code – earnest efforts toward compromise between member of the family
  • Art. 2041 of the Civil Code
  • Lansangan v. Caisip, G.R. No. 212987, 6 August 2018
  • Abagatnan v. Spouses Clarito, G.R. No. 211966, 7 August 2017
  • Chavez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 159411, 18 March 2005 ii. Jurisdiction over small claims, cases covered by the rules on Summary Procedure
  • Expedited Procedures in First Level Courts
  • Summary Procedure v. Summary Proceeding (Art. 100, 252, 253, Family Code) iii. Section 5 (4) Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution iv. B.P. 129 – Judicial Reorganization Act of 1980 as Amended by RA 11576
  • Anama v. Citibank G.R. No. 192048, 13 December 2017
  • Sps. Trayvilla v. Sejas G.R. No. 204970, 1 February 2016

V. Rule 2 - Cause of Action a. Meaning of cause of action

  • Heirs of Tomas Dolleton v. FilEstate Management, Inc., G.R. No. 170750, 7 April 2009
  • Right of Action – Multi-Realty Development Corp., G.R. No. 146726, 16 June 2006
  • Consular Area Residents Association v. Casanova G.R. No. 202618, 12 April 2016
  • Colmenar v. Colmenar, et al., G.R. No. 252467, 21 June 2021 b. Test of sufficiency of cause of action
  • Misamis Occidental II Cooperative, Inc. v. David, G.R. No. 129928, 25 August 2005 c. Splitting of a single cause of action and its effects
  • Marilag v. Martinez G.R. No. 201892, 22 July 2015
  • Yap v. First E-Bank Corporation, G.R. No. 169889, 29 September 2009
  • Umale v. Canoga Park Development Corp., G.R. No. 167246, 20 July 2011
  • Chu et al v. Cunanan G.R. No. 156185, 12 September 2011
  • Riviera Golf Club Inc v. CCA Holdings B.V. G.R. No. 173783, 17 June 2015 d. Joinder and misjoinder of causes of action
  • Perez v. Hernano, G.R. No. 147417, 8 July 2005
  • Danilo v. Pedro, G.R. No. 155736, 31 March 2005
  • Totality Rule (BP 129, Sec. 33)
  • Flores v. Mallare-Phillipps, G.R. No. L-66620, 24 September 1986 VI. Rule 3 - Parties to Civil Actions a. Natural and Juridical Persons, Entities Authorized by law
  • Verzosa v. Fernandez, 49. Phil. 627 (1926) b. Real parties in interest
  • Evangelista v. Santiago, G.R. No. 157447, 29 April 2005 c. representatives as parties
  • V-Gent, Inc. v. Morning Star Travel & Tours, Inc., G.R. No. 186305, 22 July 2015
  • Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 30 July 1993
  • Resident Marine Mammals of Tanon Strait v. Reyes G.R. No. 180771, 21 April 2015

d. Indispensable parties

  • In the Matter of the Heirship of the Late Hermogenes Rodriguez, G.R. No. 182645, 15 December 2010 (Resolution)
  • Cerezo v. Tuazon, G.R. No. 141538, 23 March 2004
  • Foster-Gallego v. Spouses Galang, G.R. No. 130228, July 27, 2004 e. necessary parties;
  • Caravan Travel and Tours International, Inc. v. Abejar, G.R. No. 170631, February 10, 2016 f. indigent parties;
  • Spouses Algura v. City of Naga G.R. No. 150135, 30 October 2006 g. alternative defendants h. Complusory and permissive joinder of parties i. Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties
  • Divinagracia v. Parilla G.R. No. 196750, 11 March 2015 j. Class suit k. Suits against entities without juridical personality l. Effect of death of party litigant
  • Spouses De la Cruz v. Joaquin, G.R. No. 162788, July 28, 2005
  • Gaffney v. Butler G.R. No. 219408, 8 November 2017
  • San Juan v. Cruz G.R. No.167321, 31 July 2006 m. Death or separation of a party who is a public officer n. Incompetency or incapacity o. Transfer of Interest p. Notice to Solicitor General VII. Rule 4 - Venue a. Venue vs. Jurisdiction
  • Nocum v. Lucio Tan G.R. No. 145022, 23 September 2005 b. Venue in civil cases vs. Criminal cases
  • Nocum v. Lucio Tan G.R. No. 145022, 23 September 2005 c. Venue of real actions d. Venue of personal actions e. Venue of actions against non-residents f. When the rules on venue does not apply
  • Ley Construction & Development Corp v. Sedan G.R. No. 222711,
  • Galofa v. Nee Bon Sing, G.R. No. L-22018, January 17, 1968 - Affirmative Defenses
  • When a specific denial requires an oath
  • Go Tong Electrical Supply Co., Inc. v. BPI Family Savings Bank, Inc., G.R. No. 187487, June 29, 2015
  • Filipinas Textile Mills v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119800, November 12, 2003
  • Colmenar v. Colmenar, et al., G.R. No. 252467, 21 June 2021 g. Counterclaims
  • Bangis v. Heirs of Adolfo, G.R. No. 190875, June 13, 2012 i. Compulsory
  • Metropolitan Bank v. CPR Promotions, G.R. No. 200567, 22 June 2015
  • Financial Building Corp. v. Forbes Park Association, G.R. No. 133119, 17 August 2000
  • Pinga v. Santiago, G.R. No. 170354, 30 June 2006
  • Maceda v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 83545, 11 August 1989
  • Carpio v. Rural Bank of Sto. Tomas (Batangas), Inc., G.R. No. 153171, 4 May 2006
  • North Greenhills Association, Inc. v. Morales, G.R. No. 222821, August 9, 2017 ii. Permissive
  • Alba v. Malapajo, G.R. No. 198752, 13 January 2016
  • Sy-Vargas v. Estate of Ogsos, G.R. No. 221062, October 5, 2016 h. Effect of failure to plead i. Failure to plead defenses and objections ii. Failure to plead a compulsory counterclaim and cross-claim i. Reply
  • Casent Realty Development Corp. v. Philbanking Corporation, G.R. No. 150731, 14 September 2007 j. Rejoinder k. Default i. When a declaration of default is proper
  • Momarco Import Co., Inc. v. Villamena, G.R. No. 192477, July 27, 2016 ii. Effect of an order of default
  • Gajudo v. Traders Royal Bank, G.R. No. 151098, 21 March 2006 iii. Relief from an order of default
  • Ramnani v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 101789, April 28, 1993 iv. Default judgment and Relief from judgment by default
  • Rule 37, Rules 40-41, Rule 38
  • Rule 28, Sec. 3 (c)
  • Martinez v. Republic, G.R. No. 160895, 30 October 2006
  • Jao & Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 93233 (Resolution), December 19, 1995
  • Indiana Aerospace University v. Commission on Higher Education, G.R. No. 139371, April 4, 2001 v. Effect of a partial default vi. Extent of relief vii. Actions where default are not allowed viii. Extension of time to file an Answer ix. Filing and service of pleadings – Rules 11 and 13 and Rule 13 - A (Supreme Court A.M. No. 19- 10 - 20 - SC Interim Rule on the Electronic Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments, and other Papers in Civil Cases) i. Payment of docket fees
    • Rule 111, Sec. 1
    • Manchester Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 75919, 7 May 1987
    • Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. V. Asuncion, G.R Nos. 79937- 38, February 13, 1989
    • Intercontinental Broadcasting Corp. (IBC-13) v. Alonzo Legasto, G.R. No. 169108, April 18, 2006 ii. Periods of filing of pleadings iii. Manner of filing iv. Modes of service v. Service of judgments, final orders or resolutions; service of court-issued orders and other documents vi. Priority of filing and service/ Conventional service or filing of orders, pleadings, and other documents vii. When service is deemed complete viii. Proof of filing and service ix. Administrative Order No. 251-2020, Guidelines on the Implementation in the Philippines of the Hague Service Convention

c. Omnibus Motion Rule; Exceptions d. Prohibited Motions; Exceptions e. Litigious and Non-Litigious Motions f. Motion Day g. Motions for Bill of Particulars (Rule 12) IV. Dismissal of Actions – Rule 17 a. Dismissal with prejudice b. Dismissal upon notice by plaintiff c. Dismissal upon motion by plaintiff; effect on existing counterclaim

  • Two Dismissal Rule d. Dismissal due to the fault of plaintiff e. Dismissal of counterclaim; crossclaim or third-party complaint
  • Limaco v. Shonan Gakuen Children's House Phil. Inc., G.R. No. 158245, June 30, 2005
  • Heirs of Tungpalan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 136207, June 21, 2005
  • Blay v. Baña, G.R. No. 232189, [March 7, 2018]
  • Quintos v. Nicolas, G.R. No. 210252, June 16, 2014 Pre-Trial – Rule 18 a. Concept, Nature and Purpose of a pre-trial b. Notice of pre-trial c. Appearance of parties; effect of failure to appear d. Pre-trial brief; effect of failure to appear and to file Pre-trial brief
  • Paredes v. Verano, G.R. No. 164375, October 12, 200
  • Spouses Khonghun v. United Coconut Planters Bank, G.R. No. 154334, July 31, 2006
  • Domingo v. Spouses Singson, G.R. Nos. 203287 & 207936, April 5, 2017 e. Pre-trial order f. Pre-trial in civil cases and pre-trial in criminal cases g. Court-Annexed Mediation h. Judicial Dispute Resolution i. 2020 Guideleins for the Conduct of JDR and CAM in Civil Cases A.M. No. 19- 10 - 20 - SC j. Judgment After Pre-Trial

Intervention – Rule 19

  • Office of the Ombudsman v. BongaisG.R. No. 226405, July 23, 2018
  • Pulgar v. RTC of Mauban, Quezon, Branch 64, G.R. No. 157583, September 10, 2014 Calendar of Cases – Rule 20 Subpoena a. Subpoena duces tecum b. Subpoena ad testificandum c. Service of subpoena d. Compelling attendance of witnesses; contempt e. Quashing of subpoena Computation of Time – Rule 22 MODES OF DISCOVERY – RULES 23 TO 29 a. Depositions pending action; depositions before action or pending appeal
    • Santamaria v. Cleary, G.R. Nos. 197122 &197161, June 15, 2016
    • Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152375, December 13, 2011 b. Written interrogatories to adverse parties
    • Phil. Health Insurance Corp. v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, G.R. No. 193158, November 11, 2015
    • Sibayan v. Alda, G.R. No. 233395, January 17, 2018 c. Request for admission
    • Allied Agri-Business Development Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118438, December 4, 1998
    • Duque v. Spouses Yu, G.R. No. 226130, February 19, 2018
    • Metro Manila Shopping Mecca Corp. v. Toledo, G.R. No. 190818, June 5, 2013
    • Estate of Marcos v. Republic, G.R. Nos. 213027 & 213253 (Resolution), January 18, 2017
    • Lañada v. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 102390 & 102404, February 1, 2002
    • Manzano v. Despabiladeras, G.R. No. 148786, December 16, 2004 d. Production or inspection of documents or things
    • Insigne v. Abra Valley Colleges, Inc., G.R. No. 204089, July 29, 2015
    • Air Philippines Corp. v. Pennswell, Inc., G.R. No. 172835, December 13, 2007 e. Physical and mental examination of persons

d. Judgment on Compromise

  • Gadrinab v. Salamanca, G.R. No. 194560, 11 June 2014 e. Judgment on the pleadings – Rule 34
  • Sunbanun v. Go, G.R. No. 163280, 2 February 2010
  • Diman v. Alumbres, G.R. No. 131466, November 27, 1998
  • Iloilo Jar Corp. v. Comglasco Corp., G.R. No. 219509, January 18, 2017
  • Comglasco Corp. v. Santos Car Check Center Corp., G.R. No. 202989, March 25, 2015 f. Summary judgments – Rule 35
  • Asian Construction v. PCIB, G.R. No. 153827, 25 April 2006
  • Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152154, July 15, 2003
  • Province of Pangasinan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104266, March 31, 1993 g. Contents of a judgment h. Rendition of judgments and final orders i. Amendment of Judgment vs. Supplemental Judgment
  • Esquivel v. Alegre, G.R. No. 79425, April 17, 1989
  • Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines v. Philippine Airlines, Inc., G.R. Nos. 178083 & A.M. No. 11- 10 - 1 - SC (Resolution), March 13, 2018

j. Judgment nunc pro tunc

  • Cardoza v. Singson, G.R. No. 59284, January 12, 1990
  • Nuñal v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 94005, April 6, 1993 k. Entry of judgment and final order l. Law of the Case m. Bar by former judgment and conclusiveness of judgment
  • Del Rosario v. Far East Bank. G.R No. 150134, 31 October 2007
  • Islamic Directorate of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 117897, May 14, 1997
  • Allied Banking Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108089, January 10, 1994
  • Spouses Noceda v. ArbizoDirecto, G.R. No. 178495, July 26, 2010 n. Immutability of final judgment
  • Griffith v. Estur, G.R. No. 161777, 7 May 2008

Post-judgment Remedies

a. Motion for New Trial or Reconsideration

• Manila Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

137122, November 15, 2000

• Dinglasan, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 145420, September 19, 2006

• Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines v.

Philippine Airlines, Inc., G.R. Nos. 178083 & A.M. No. 11 10 - 1 - SC

(Resolution), March 13, 2018

Note: Appeal (and rules governing it) is a post judgment remedy. However, LEB

Syllabus for Civil Procedure 1 only covers Rules 1 to 39. Hence, Appeals, Provisional

Remedies, and Special Civil Actions will be tackled in Civil Procedure II.

Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Remedies – Rule 39

a. Difference between finality of judgment for purposes of appeal; for purposes of

execution

b. When execution shall issue

c. How a judgment is executed

• Villeza v. German Management and Services, Inc., G.R. No. 182937,

August 9, 2010

• Gagoomal v. Spouses Villacorta, G.R. No. 192813, January 18, 2012

• Testate Estate of Maria Manuel Vda. De Biascan v. Biascan, G.R. No.

138731, 11 December 2000

• Office of the Court Administrator v. Corpuz, A.M. No. P- 00 - 1418,

September 24, 2003

• Florendo v. Paramount Insurance Corp, G.R. No. 167976, 20 January

• Balajonda v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 166032, 28 February 2005

• Saligumba v. Palanog, G.R. No. 143365, 4 December 2008

• Infante v. Aran Builders, G.R. No. 156596, 24 August 2007

d. Immediate execution

• Centennial Guarantee Assurance Corp. v. Universal Motors Corp., G.R.

No. 189358, October 8, 2014

e. Properties exempt from execution

f. Proceedings where property is claimed by third persons; in relation to third party

claim in attachment and replevin

g. Rules on redemption

h. Examination of judgment obligor when judgment is unsatisfied

i. Effect of judgment or final orders

• Del Rosario v. Far East Bank. G.R No. 150134, 31 October 2007

• Islamic Directorate of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

117897, May 14, 1997

• Allied Banking Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108089, January 10,