Assessment and Feedback in BTEC Programmes: A Guide for Learners and Teachers, Exams of Tourism

Download Assessment and Feedback in BTEC Programmes: A Guide for Learners and Teachers and more Exams Tourism in PDF only on Docsity!

BTEC Assessment Policies

Examinations

Reviewed by: Jon Brigden

Review Date: November 2018

Next Review: November 2019

Previous Reviews:

 March 2012

 March 2015

 March 2018

Contents

Policy Page No. Registration and Certification Policy and Procedures 3 Assessment and Internal Verification Policy 4 Assessment Malpractice Policy 10 Appeals Policy 13 Appeals Procedure 14 Roles & Responsibilities BTEC Science 15 BTEC Sport 16 BTEC Travel & Tourism 17 BTEC Home Cooking Skills 18

BTEC ASSESSMENT AND INTERNAL VERIFICATION POLICY

ASSESSMENT

Assessment is used by teachers to judge learner’s attainment. For learners, assessment indicates successful learning and the need for further study or further evidence. Assessment can be formative and summative; teachers will use both in assessing learners’ attainment. NEW ASSESSMENT POLICY / PROCEDURE (APPLICABLE TO ALL REGISTRATIONS AT LEVEL 2 & 3, NQF AND QCF)  Before starting an assessment the assessor must ensure that each student understands the assessment requirements – this includes having access to the content of what is required for the assessment and also the importance of time management and submission deadlines. The students must also be aware of the restrictions in how the assessor can provide support once the assessment has been started.  Once the assignment brief has been given out the assessor must not provide specific assessment feedback directly related to the achievement of specific assessment criteria. Students must use their knowledge / notes / textbook to work independently towards the task.  Only one submission is allowed for each assignment task. This must be handed in to the assessor on the designated deadline day outlined within the assessment plan, unless there has been an agreed extension between the assessor and the student. The Lead IV must be informed of any agreed extensions.  For each assignment task the student must submit the following:

1. An assignment which consists of evidence towards the targeted assessment criteria
2. A signed and dated declaration of authenticity which confirms the evidence has been produced independently
3. Appropriately referencing  The feedback from the assessor must be completed on the Pearson approved assessment feedback form and within the specified time allocated within the assessment plan. An appropriate number should be handed on for internal verification. This would normally be 4 pieces from each assessment – one pass, one merit, one distinction and one from the most common grade. Each assessment is an opportunity for the internal verifier to check the assessment of different students. Internal verification should be within a maximum of 10 working days of the assessor’s decision. The date for this must also be identified within the assessment plan.  The assessor must formally record and confirm the achievement of specific assessment criteria on the assessment feedback form. They should also complete a confirmation that the evidence they have assessed is authentic and is the students’ own work. Feedback confirms which assessment criteria have been achieved and

what evidence has been provided towards criteria not achieved. The assessor must not provide feedback on how to improve the evidence to achieve higher grades.  If the internal verifier questions the award of grades the ‘loop’ must be completed by the assessor before the work is given back to the student.  The Lead IV may authorise one opportunity for the student to resubmit evidence to meet assessment criteria targeted by an assignment. This can only be authorised if the following conditions are met:

1. The student has met the initial deadline set in the assignment, or has met an agreed deadline extension.
2. The assessor judges that the student will be able to provide improved evidence without further guidance.
3. The original work has been authenticated by both the student and the teacher If any of the above three conditions are not met the Lead IV must not authorise a resubmission  If the Lead IV authorises a resubmission it must be:
4. Recorded on the assessment feedback form.
5. Completed within 15 working days of the student receiving the results of the assessment.
6. Undertaken by the student without any further guidance.
7. The student and the assessor must complete the appropriate forms to confirm the authenticity of the re submitted work Re takes are not available to students on NQF programmes of study Reference – ‘Guide to Internal Assessment for BTEC Firsts and Nationals’ This can be accessed through the Pearson web site: www.btec.co.uk - quality assurance - key documents

RECORDS

 Teachers must keep records of learners and their assessed work.  Teacher records must be monitored and sampled by the Lead Internal Verifier and Programme Manager.  Learner assessments and verification records must be stored securely by the Programme Manager until all the final grades have been submitted; certification has been received by the school and handed out to the learners. In the event of an appeal against a grade then the evidence of the assessments should be kept until the appeal has been concluded.  Learner grades must be kept in a secure location for three years after certification. WEAKNESSES IN ASSESSMENT Where there is an identified weakness in the assessment process the following will happen:  Quality Nominee / Lead Internal Verifier’s will initially offer support and guidance. This will include setting actions as per Edexcel / school documentation and making sure the actions are followed up.  If necessary the Quality Nominee and senior staff will become part of the support and guidance process. INTERNAL VERIFICATION Internal verification is a requirement of BTEC delivery. It is carried out on two levels in subject areas:

1. Internal verification of assignment briefs.
2. Internal verification of assessment decisions. It is the responsibility of the Lead IV to ensure all of this has been completed within the agreed time frame on the assessment plan. WHAT IS INTERNAL VERIFICATION? Internal Verification (IV) is a system of quality checks made by someone in the centre to ensure that assignments have been written correctly and that assessment decisions are accurate. It is a recorded discussion between two professionals to ensure accuracy, fairness, consistency and quality of assessment. It does not involve the learner. The Lead IV will produce an IV schedule as part of the annual assessment plan, and will keep a record of which learner work has been sampled, and in which units. The amount of work to be IV’d will be determined by the Lead IV – but this should be a minimum of 4 pieces of work for each assessment. This should be made up wherever possible of a piece of work at all three levels of achievement (P, M & D) and one more of the most common grade. It is recommended that this number is increased for either new assessors to BTEC (> to 50% for first assessed piece of work) or for programmes with large cohorts of students (>20)

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?

Assessment is a crucial part of BTEC delivery because most BTEC assessment are written and developed by staff in the centre. It is essential that the assessment and verification of learner work is accurate, rigorous and in line with national standards promoted by the exam board. Assessment decisions of internally assessed units are totally in the hands of centre staff. Internal Verification checks that the standards set by the awarding body are being maintained. Further guidance can be found in the Centre Guide to Managing Quality on the Key Documents page of the BTEC website: www.edexcel.com/quals/BTEC/quality/Pages/documents.aspx NEW STAFF Any new member of staff (not just NQT’s) will need an induction programme to make sure they fully understand all the BTEC requirements of their role. They must also review the Brompton Hall School BTEC policies. This will normally be a Departmental responsibility but extra support will be offered by senior staff (usually the Deputy Headteacher) if necessary. The induction programme will include:  Recommended 50% of assessed work sampled during the induction period (Quality Nominee to oversee and decide how long the induction period needs to be – this will vary with the experience of staff).  The ‘buddying’ of new staff with experienced BTEC staff (this could be from other Departments).  Quality Nominee / Lead Internal Verifier will identify any areas to improve and offer the necessary support. STANDARDS VERIFICATION When a Principal Subject Area is going through standards verification the following will apply:  The Quality Nominee will initially take the lead in liaising with Edexcel re Standards Verification.  After the initial contact either the Quality Nominee or Lead IV will liaise with the allocated standards verifier re the sample requested.  If there is an unsuccessful outcome from the 1st sample there will be a 2nd sample.  It is essential at this stage that the Lead IV consults with the Quality Nominee to ensure that the second sample is checked thoroughly and that the advice and guidance given by the Standards Verifier is applied to this sample.  If the second sample has an unsuccessful outcome the Regional Quality Manager will set up a remedial action plan.  Before the agreed sample date the standards verifier will need the following:

ASSESSMENT MALPRACTICE POLICY

Learners have a responsibility to ensure all work they hand in to be marked is their own. Any additional help or support that they have received must be reported to the assessor before the candidate signs the authentication of work statement. If Candidate Malpractice is suspected, this will be reported to the BTEC Manager / Examinations Officer who will inform the Quality Nominee and the Headteacher. An investigation of the alleged malpractice will follow. Consequences will vary on the outcome of the investigation but may include the candidate’s malpractice being reported to Edexcel. This may result in the candidate being withdrawn from the course and being prevented from taking a qualification with this board for one year. Aim  To identify and minimise the risk of malpractice by learners.  To respond to any incident of alleged malpractice promptly and objectively.  To standardise and record any investigation of malpractice to ensure openness and fairness.  To impose appropriate penalties and/or sanctions on learners where incidents (or attempted incidents) of malpractice are proven.  To protect the integrity of this centre and BTEC qualifications. In order to do this, the centre will:  Seek to avoid potential malpractice by informing learners of the centre’s policy on malpractice and the penalties for attempted and actual incidents of malpractice.  Show learners the appropriate formats to record cited texts and other materials or information sources.  Ask learners to declare that their work is their own.  Ask learners to provide evidence that they have interpreted and synthesised appropriate information and acknowledged any sources used.  Conduct an investigation in a form commensurate with the nature of the malpractice allegation. Such an investigation will be supported by the HEAD OF CENTRE and all personnel linked to the allegation. It will proceed through the following stages:

1. Suspected malpractice must be reported immediately to BTEC MANAGER / EXAMINATIONS OFFICER with written report and accompanying evidence.
2. BTEC MANAGER / EXAMINATIONS OFFICER or other nominated member of staff will interview individual, who will invited to respond to the accusation in writing.
3. BTEC MANAGER / EXAMINATIONS OFFICER or other nominated member of staff to investigate if malpractice has occurred. Will advise and/or seek advice from Edexcel as appropriate.
4. If malpractice is found, all work by individual to be reassessed, and work of other individuals if required.

In cases of alleged/suspected Malpractice, the following will be done:  Make the individual fully aware at the earliest opportunity of the nature of the alleged malpractice and of the possible consequences should malpractice be proven.  Give the individual the opportunity to respond to the allegations made.  Inform the individual of the avenues for appealing against any judgment made.  Document all stages of any investigation. Where malpractice is proven, Brompton Hall School will apply the following penalties / sanctions:

1. Any mark/grade awarded for work in question will be withdrawn. Work will need to redone with supervision.
2. In cases of severe and deliberate malpractice, the individual will be withdrawn from the course and Edexcel advised.
3. Individual has right of appeal. Circumstances will be investigated by BTEC MANAGER / EXAMINATIONS OFFICER plus SCHOOL GOVERNOR. Definition of Malpractice by Learners This list is not exhaustive and other instances of malpractice may be considered by this centre at its discretion:  Plagiarism of any nature.  Collusion by working collaboratively with other learners to produce work that is submitted as individual learner work.  Copying (including the use of ICT to aid copying).  Deliberate destruction of another’s work.  Fabrication of results or evidence.  False declaration of authenticity in relation to the contents of a portfolio or coursework.  Impersonation by pretending to be someone else in order to produce the work for another or arranging for another to take one’s place in an assessment / examination / test. Definition of Malpractice by Centre Staff This list is not exhaustive and other instances of malpractice may be considered by this centre at its discretion:  Improper assistance to candidates.  Inventing or changing marks for internally assessed work (coursework or portfolio evidence) where there is insufficient evidence of the candidates’ achievement to justify the marks given or assessment decisions made.  Failure to keep candidate coursework/portfolios of evidence secure.  Fraudulent claims for certificates.  Inappropriate retention of certificates.

APPEALS POLICY

Brompton Hall School’s policy is designed to uphold consistency and fairness in assessment and awarding marks and grades. This document covers the school’s policy in dealing with appeals against internal assessment in accordance with JCQ regulations, which states that all centres conducting examinations should:

1. Have a published appeals procedure relating to internal assessment decisions.
2. Make this document available and accessible to candidates. All learners are able to formally challenge an assessment mark or grade awarded. In the first instance they should discuss this with their BTEC teacher / assessor. If they are still dissatisfied they should discuss with the BTEC Programme Manager and/or Quality Nominee. If still unresolved then they should refer to the centre appeals policy for internally assessed work for external qualifications displayed on the school website. Aims:  To enable the learner to enquire, question or appeal against an assessment decision.  To attempt to reach agreement between the learner and the assessor at the earliest opportunity.  To standardise and record any appeal to ensure openness and fairness.  To facilitate a learner’s ultimate right of appeal to the awarding body, where appropriate.  To protect the interests of all learners and the integrity of the qualification. In order to do this, the centre will:  Inform the learner at induction, of the Appeals Policy and procedure.  Record, track and validate any appeal.  Forward the appeal to the awarding body when a learner considers that a decision continues to disadvantage her/him after the internal appeals process has been exhausted.  Keep appeals records for inspection by the awarding body for a minimum of 18 months.  Have a staged appeals procedure.  Will take appropriate action to protect the interests of other learners and the integrity of the qualification, when the outcome of an appeal questions the validity of other results.  Monitor appeals to inform quality improvement.

APPEALS PROCEDURE

If students have any concerns with regards to their individual assignments then the following procedure should be followed:  Stage One. Speak to the teacher / assessor who has set and marked the assignment, explaining the reason for your concerns. The tutor, after considering your explanation, will provide a response with a clear explanation of the decision taken. If the student still remains unhappy with the outcome they should proceed to the next stage.  Stage Two. Speak to the Deputy Headteacher who will address the issue. He/she will consider the reason for the appeal and the response of the teacher / assessor. A decision will be given to the student within 5 working days of the concern being received. If the student remains unhappy and wishes to proceed to the next stage the Programme Manager must record the appeal.  Stage Three. The Deputy Headteacher will forward relevant details to the Headteacher who must convene, within 10 working days, a panel comprising him/her self, the Deputy Headteacher, student, the teacher/assessor and a parent or a friend of the student (if requested). The Headteacher must make a decision and inform all parties within five working days of the Appeals Panel meeting. This decision is final. A written record will be kept of the proceedings and will include the outcome of the appeal and the reasons for this. A copy of the records will sent to the candidate and made available to the examination board. (If you are appealing against an assessment decision made by the Programme Manager stage 2 is missed out) If at stage two the teacher / assessor disagrees with the decision then he/she has the right to appeal and stage three occurs The school will maintain a written record of all appeals. The school will inform the Awarding Body of any change to an internally assessed mark as a result of an appeal. All appeals should have been resolved by the date of the last externally assessed paper of the examination.

BTEC Sport

Quality Nominee Ms S Young Applied Science Internal Verifier Ms S Young Assessors Mr S Dale Mr D Bird

BTEC Travel & Tourism

Quality Nominee Ms S Young Applied Science Internal Verifier Ms S Young Assessors Mrs B Harrison Mr K Moore