Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Authentic Assessment in Kinematics Based on Pancasila Student Profiles – PPT, Slides of Physics

This presentation explains the development of authentic assessment tools for Linear Motion Kinematics in Grade XI, integrating the character education of the Pancasila Student Profiles. It includes background, objectives, research questions, methodology, and sample assessments. Designed as a proposal seminar material, this PPT can be a helpful reference for physics education students, teachers, and researchers who want to implement character-based assessment in line with the Merdeka Curriculum. Created by Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi, Bilingual Physics Education Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Medan, 2025.

Typology: Slides

2024/2025

Available from 06/29/2025

emeninta-pelawi
emeninta-pelawi 🇮🇩

4 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Name : Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi
ID :4213121015
PROPOSAL
SEMINAR
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Authentic Assessment in Kinematics Based on Pancasila Student Profiles – PPT and more Slides Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Name : Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi

ID : 4213121015

PROPOSAL SEMINAR

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT BASED ON THE

CHARACTER EDUCATION OF PANCASILA STUDENT

PROFILES IN LINEAR MOTION KINEMATICS FOR

CLASS XI AT SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI

Name : Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi

ID : 4213121015

Study Program : Bilingual Physics Education

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES

MEDAN

Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3

1.1 (^) 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1. The absence of clear guidelines for scoring and assessment instruments that integrate students' cognitive and character aspects. Teachers face challenges in effectively implementing authentic assessments that align with the objectives of the Independent Curriculum. There is a gap between the expectations of an independent curriculum that emphasizes character assessment and current assessment practices that focus more on cognitive. Identification of problems Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3 2 1 3

Key aspects of the research include:

  • Create scoring guidelines, assessment rubrics, and assessment formats aligned with the Pancasila Student Profile.
  • Testing the effectiveness of the developed instruments in assessing character education-based authentic assessments. 1.1 (^) 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.

This research focuses on developing and

evaluating authentic assessment instruments

for character education based on the

Pancasila Student Profile in the context of

linear motion kinematics in physics learning.

Assessment instrument development aims to evaluate the validity, reliability, and effectiveness of instruments aligned with Pancasila Student Profile character education. 1 Authentic assessment instruments focus on measuring:

  • Physics understanding in the HOTS category (C 4 , C 5 , C 6 ).
  • Process skills aligned with the Merdeka Curriculum.
  • Attitude dimensions of independence, creativity, and critical reasoning as part of the Pancasila Student Profile Scope of Research Scope of^ the Problem 2 Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3 Key aspects of the research include:
  • Create scoring guidelines, assessment rubrics, and assessment formats aligned with the Pancasila Student Profile.
  • Testing the effectiveness of the developed instruments in assessing character education-based authentic assessments.

1.1 (^) 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1. Benefits of the Research

For Students:

Enhance understanding of the relevance of physics concepts to real life.

For Teachers:

Provide clear guidelines for creating authentic assessment rubrics that integrate dimensions of the Pancasila Student Profile. For Other Researchers: Serve as a reference for developing authentic assessment instruments that connect academic achievement with character development based on the Pancasila Student Profile. Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3

2.1 2. Literature Review

Authentic Assessment Character^ Education

Measures cognitive, skill, and affective aspects

#ATTACHED

Research Development

Procedures

Kinematics of Linear

Motion

Pancasila Student

Profile

2.3 2.4^ 2.5 2.6^ 2.7^ 2. Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3

Operational Definition Research Instruments 3.1 (^) 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 (^) 3.9 3. Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3

  • Comprises 23 essay questions on linear motion kinematics.
  • Structured and detailed assessment rubric for each essay question.
  • Outlines clear indicators for:  Physics understanding  Process skills  Attitudes Authentic assessment Kinematics Character Education of Pancasila Student Profile Data Collection Techniques

Literature Study

Interview

Tests

Questionnaire

Documentation

Research Procedure

3.1 (^) 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 (^) 3.9 3. Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3 Define Design Develop Dissemniate

Assessment Instruments

3.1 (^) 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 (^) 3.9 3. Qualitative data are derived from expert validators in the form of comments and suggestions regarding the authentic assessment instruments, process skills instruments, and attitude assessment instruments based on Pancasila student profile character education.

  1. Qualitative Data The quantitative data obtained include: a. Assessment scores from expert validators on the authentic assessment instruments based on Pancasila student profile character education. b. Student learning outcome scores on straight motion kinematics material using authentic assessment instruments, process skills instruments, and attitude assessment instruments based on Pancasila student profile character education.
  2. Quantitative Data Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3

Eligibility Standards for Question Items

3.1 (^) 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 (^) 3.9 3. Title Ch. 2 Ch. 1 Ch. 3 Information Accepted Revised Rejected Validity Valid Valid/Invalid Invalid Reliability Reliability ≥0. (Reliable) < 0.7 (Not Reliable) < 0.7 (Not Reliable) Difficulty Level P < 0. 0.3 ≤P ≤0. P > 0.7a P < 0. 0.3 ≤P ≤0. P > 0. P < 0. Or P > 0. Discriminating power 0.20 – 1.00 0.00- 1.00 0.00 – 0. Effectiveness >55% <55% <55%