















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A comprehensive overview of auditing procedures and internal controls, covering key concepts such as assurance engagements, corporate social responsibility assurance, limitations of an audit, and the going concern assumption. It also delves into the role of corporate governance and information technology risks in auditing. Particularly useful for students studying accounting, finance, or business.
Typology: Exams
1 / 23
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
An example of the three parties in an assurance engagement would be: - Auditor, shareholder, general public.
An assurance engagement can be defined as an engagement to enhance the reliability of the subject matter.
Corporate Social Responsibility assurance: - Includes disclosures on environmental, employee, and social reporting. - Includes both financial and non-financial information. - Reporting is voluntary and is becoming more widespread.
Limitations of an audit are caused by: - The need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost. - The nature of audit procedures. - The nature of financial reporting.
An example of a reasonable assurance engagement is the audit of annual financial statements.
When auditors are engaged in work where no assurance is provided, it means that an assurance is not provided as the client determines the nature, timing, and extent of the evidence that is gathered and will determine their own outcome.
In a review engagement, the least likely occurrence during the engagement is substantive audit procedures.
The wording of a negative expression of opinion generally states that there is nothing that has come to the auditor's attention that would lead them to believe that the information being assured is not true and fair.
An emphasis of matter is included when the auditor's opinion has not changed and the auditor wants to bring the users' attention to a particular matter.
The types of opinion are: - Qualified opinion - Disclaimer of opinion - Adverse opinion
An example of an unmodified audit opinion is an unqualified audit opinion with an emphasis of matter.
Comparability allows users to: - Assess the performance of the entity over time and with other entities. - Identify trends that may influence their perception of how well the entity is doing.
In addition to the preparation of financial statements, it is also the responsibility of those charged with governance to: - Select and apply appropriate accounting policies and make reasonable accounting estimates.
Professional scepticism does not involve the professional requirement that all management representations be substantiated with supporting documentation.
Under CLERP9, the disclosure of material transactions between auditor and entity during the period under audit is not correct.
Risk Assessment I
The risk response phase of an audit involves the performance of detailed tests of controls and substantive testing of transactions and accounts.
Preliminary risk identification can be affected by corporate governance and fraud risk.
Audit risk can be defined as the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion at the conclusion of the audit.
Examples of information used by auditors in gaining an understanding of a client at the entity level include whether the client is an importer or exporter of goods.
Auditors do not usually consider relevant issues at the audit committee level when gaining an understanding of their client.
Red flags that auditors can use to alert them to the possibility that a fraud may have occurred include a high turnover of key employees.
In assessing the client's relationship with its employees, the auditor will consider the level of unionisation among the workforce, how well a client pays its employees, and the attitude of staff to their employer.
If a client's products or services are seasonal, this will affect revenue flow.
Relevant factors when gaining an understanding of the client at the economy level include changes in interest rates.
Opportunities to perpetrate a fraud do not include rapid growth.
An example of a misappropriation of assets fraud is unauthorised discounts or refunds to customers.
When assessing fraud risk, an auditor will adopt an attitude of professional scepticism.
Attitudes and rationalisation to justify a fraud include an excessive focus on profit maximisation.
When assessing the risk of fraud, an auditor can consider attitudes and rationalisation to justify a fraud, opportunities to perpetuate a fraud, and incentives and pressures to commit fraud.
Going Concern Assumption
The going concern assumption is made when it is believed that a company will remain in business for the foreseeable future.
If auditors identify risk factors that indicate the going concern assumption may be in doubt, they will undertake procedures to gather evidence regarding each risk factor.
Examples of mitigating factors that reduce the risk that the going concern assumption may be in doubt include: - The ability to raise additional funds via borrowings - The ability to sell an unprofitable segment of the business - A letter of guarantee from a parent company
By setting high detection risk, an auditor will reduce the level of reliance placed on their detailed substantive procedures.
When classifying risks as being significant, consideration is given to whether the risk involves significant related party transactions, is related to significant economic or accounting developments, or involves fraud.
If there is a risk that management's assertion that recorded inventory exists is not valid, the auditor will spend more time testing for the existence of recorded inventory.
Audit Risk
Audit risk is the risk that an auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion when a financial report is materially misstated.
Audit risk can be reduced at the planning stage of an audit by identifying the key risks faced by the client. It is impossible to completely eliminate audit risk.
Control risk is the risk that a client's system of internal controls will not prevent or detect a material misstatement.
Materiality
An item that is considered material due to its magnitude is referred to as being quantitatively material, while an item that is considered material due to its nature is referred to as being qualitatively material.
As a rule of thumb, items greater than 10% of profit before tax, 1% of total assets, or 2% of equity would generally be considered material.
By setting a lower planning materiality level, an auditor increases the quality and quantity of evidence that needs to be gathered.
Audit Strategies
An audit strategy will include increased reliance on tests of controls when inherent risk and control risk are low.
The audit strategy for a client with high inherent risk and high control risk will include no or very limited tests of controls.
If a company breaches a debt covenant, it will need to renegotiate or repay the loan.
KPIs reflect the success factors of an organisation and some are common to many clients, such as return on assets.
Analytical Procedures
Analytical procedures are conducted at the risk assessment phase of the audit to aid in the identification of risk and enhance the understanding of a client. They are used throughout all phases of an audit.
Information generated by an accounting system with ineffective internal controls is generally not considered to be reliable for analytical procedures.
An example of a liquidity ratio is cost of sales divided by average inventory.
A control within a software program being overridden or disabled Human error that results in a breakdown in internal control
The control environment does not refer to the policies and procedures that help make sure management's directives are carried out. It sets the tone of an entity and the foundation for all other components of internal control.
Elements of the control environment include:
Participation by those charged with governance Commitment to competence
For identified risks, management:
Estimates their significance Assesses the likelihood of their occurrence Decides upon actions to manage them
Control activities are policies and procedures that help make sure management's directives are carried out. They include:
Performance reviews Information processing Physical controls Segregation of duties
The most common ways of auditors documenting their understanding of internal controls include:
Preformatted questionnaires Flowcharts Narratives
An internal control exception is an observed condition that provides evidence that the control being tested did not operate as indicated.
The purpose of the management letter is to inform the client of the auditor's recommendations for improving its internal controls.
Sampling
Sampling is not required when an audit procedure is conducted on an entire group of transactions.
Sampling risk is the risk that the auditor concludes that their client's internal controls are ineffective when they are effective, or vice versa. Non-sampling risk arises when an auditor uses an inappropriate audit procedure.
It is lower cost than statistical sampling. It allows an auditor to select a sample that they believe is appropriate. It requires less staff training.
Statistical sampling involves random selection and probability to evaluate results.
When testing controls, factors that influence the sample size include:
An increase in the tolerable rate of deviation Stratification of the population when appropriate An increase in the auditor's assessment of the risk of material misstatement
When testing controls, the tolerable error is the minimum rate of deviation that an auditor will accept.
Tolerable Rates and Errors in Auditing
The tolerable rate of deviation is the maximum rate of deviation from a prescribed control procedure that an auditor is willing to accept before concluding that the control is ineffective.
Evaluating Sample Test Results
The auditor will consider whether the population was stratified before being sampled when evaluating the sample test results. This information can provide additional context for interpreting the results.
If an error is considered to be unique, it will be removed before projecting the remaining errors to the population. This ensures that the projected error is representative of the population.
If the auditor discovers errors when testing transactions or account balances, they will need to project the error to the population being tested.
If the rate of deviation exceeds the tolerable rate, the auditor will extend their testing to obtain more evidence about the effectiveness of the control.
Factors Affecting Risk of Misstatement
Accounts that require estimation or complex calculations are at a higher risk of misstatement compared to those that use simple valuation techniques.
Evaluating Projected Errors
If the total projected error in an account balance was less than the tolerable error, the auditor would conclude that the errors detected are not material.
Factors Influencing Substantive Sample Size
An increase in the auditor's assessment of the risk of material misstatement will lead to an increase in the sample size for substantive testing.
Stratification of the population, when appropriate, can also influence the sample size for substantive testing.
An increase in the tolerable rate of deviation is not a factor that influences the sample size for substantive testing.
Purpose of Tests of Controls
Tests of controls are conducted to establish that: 1. Controls operate effectively throughout the period. 2. There are no material misstatements in the financial statements.
Control Risk
Control risk is the risk that a client's system of internal controls will not prevent or detect a material misstatement.
Types of Substantive Audit Procedures
Substantive audit procedures include: 1. Analytical procedures 2. Detailed tests of transactions 3. Detailed tests of balances
Objectives of Detailed Substantive Procedures
When conducting detailed substantive procedures, auditors search for evidence that all transactions have been recorded in the correct accounts.
Audit Strategy with High Control Risk
When control risk is high, the audit strategy is to do little or no tests of controls and increase reliance on substantive testing of transactions and account balances.
Timing of Audit Procedures for High-Risk
Accounts
For high-risk accounts, the timing of most audit procedures will be at, or after, year-end.
Vouching involves tracking a source document through to the underlying accounting records and agreeing the details of a transaction to supporting evidence outside of the company's accounting records.
Roll-forward procedures are performed to update the audit findings from the time of the interim procedures through to year-end.
The primary purpose of vouching is to ensure that the balances or transactions are not overstated.
Tracing is primarily directed towards verifying the completeness assertion.
Analytical procedures may not be used in testing internal controls.
Variables estimation sampling is used if the auditor expects more than a few errors in an account balance.
The first step an auditor performs when performing analytical procedures is to identify the computation, comparison or relationship to be made or investigated.
Confirmation analysis is not a type of analytical procedure.
The levels of evidence obtained when performing substantive procedures include general, minimal, corroborative, and persuasive.
Substantive Testing of Balance Sheet Items
The additional opportunities for influencing the timing of the work include auditing activity in the period to date, auditing events occurring prior to year-end, and leveraging off the activities of the internal audit function.
When the assessment of inherent and control risk is low, there are lots of controls that have been tested and found to be effective, and the level of substantive procedures is limited.
Accounts that are clearly trivial or immaterial are usually only subjected to analytical procedures.
The substantive tests of cash account balances that are always performed include examining the client's bank reconciliations, testing cut-off of cash receipts, cash payments and transfers at year-end, and confirming cash held by others.
The substantive test of the trade receivables balance that is always performed is evaluating the adequacy of the provision for doubtful debts.
The two audit assertions considered most important to the auditor concluding there are no material misstatements in trade receivables at year- end are existence and valuation and allocation.
The rights and obligations assertion relates to the audit objective that the entity owns, or has the legal right to, all of the inventory on the balance sheet.
Observing the client's stocktake enables the auditor to establish that items belonging to the client are accurately counted and recorded, count tags, sheets or cards are properly controlled, and the client's personnel are complying with the instructions for stocktakes.
The key objective when performing substantive procedures is to determine whether there are material misstatements within the balance being investigated.
Substantive Testing of Income Statement
Items
The type of substantive procedure auditors ordinarily use when testing income statement accounts is analytical procedures.
Substantive procedures are also known as tests of details.
The risk that an auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when a financial report is materially misstated is known as audit risk.
Analytical procedures involve the investigation of identified fluctuations and relationships that are inconsistent with other information, and evaluations of financial information made by a study of plausible relationships among financial and non-financial data.
When the inherent risk and control risk assessment is high, the amount of substantive testing is significant.
Control risk is the risk that a client's system of internal controls will not prevent or detect a material misstatement.
Sales revenue is typically significant due to its size, the overall inherent risk associated with revenue, and the volume of transactions that flow through the account.
The level of substantive procedures will be limited when the inherent and control risk assessment is low.
A simple way of testing which period a sale should be recorded in is to vouch the sale to the delivery documentation for the sale of goods.
The three audit assertions that are important to ensure the auditor has gained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence for sales revenue are occurrence, accuracy, and cut-off.
The occurrence assertion for sales relates to the audit objective that all sales included in the income statement represent the exchange of goods or services with customers during the period.
Testing the postings of the sales ledger to the general ledger and the trade receivables sub-ledger relates to the completeness assertion.
Examples of substantive procedures in auditing revenue that are always performed include comparing the monthly income statements to budget and investigating any unexpected fluctuations, and testing the cut-off of revenues.
The key audit assertions when auditing cost of sales and expenses include accuracy, cut-off, and completeness.
Audit Assertions and Substantive Tests
The comparison of supplier/creditor invoices to the initial record of entry relates to the completeness assertion. This procedure helps ensure that all transactions have been properly recorded and included in the financial statements.