

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth exploration of asymptotic analysis and the big-o notation, a mathematical tool used to characterize the growth rate of algorithms. It covers the definition and properties of the big-o notation, as well as how to apply it to analyze the time complexity of various functions. Examples of linear, quadratic, cubic, and polynomial functions, demonstrating the process of determining their big-o classifications. It also discusses the advantages of worst-case analysis over average-case analysis and the importance of growth rate analysis in understanding algorithm performance. Overall, this document serves as a comprehensive guide to the fundamental concepts of asymptotic analysis, equipping readers with the knowledge to analyze the efficiency of algorithms and make informed decisions in algorithm design and implementation.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
We need to measure the computational time in a more high-level fashion, prior to implementing the algorithm and performing experimental studies. We should employ mathematical techniques that analyze algorithms independently of specific implementations, computers, or data.
The growth rate analysis from the previous lecture allows us to characterize the running times of algorithms by using functions that map the size of the input, n, to values that correspond to the main factor that determines the growth rate in terms of n.
Asymptotic analysis is a method of describing the limiting behavior of a function as the input size becomes very large. It is based on mathematical concepts such as limits, differentiation, integration, and analytic functions.
The "big-Oh" notation is a way of providing an asymptotic upper bound on the growth rate of a function f(n). Specifically, we say that f(n) is O(g(n)) if there exists a real constant c > 0 and an integer constant n₀ ≥ 1 such that for all n ≥ n₀, f(n) ≤ c * g(n).
The choice of c and n₀ is not unique, as there can be many different combinations that would make the proof work, depending on the inequalities used while doing the upper-bounding.
The big-Oh notation provides an asymptotic way of saying that a function is "less than or equal to" another function. It represents the upper bound of an algorithm's runtime, i.e., the worst-case scenario. This means that the runtime grows at most as fast as the function g(n) as the input size increases.
Analyzing the worst-case scenario is much easier than average-case analysis, as the worst-case input is often simple to identify. Focusing on the worst-case input typically leads to better algorithms, as an algorithm performing well in the worst case will also do well on every input.
The growth rate analysis from the previous lecture can be used to predict the relative performance of different algorithms as the input size increases. This can be visualized using graphs that show the running time as a function
of the input size, with different growth rates represented by different curves.
The table provided in the original text shows several examples of functions and their corresponding growth rates and big-Oh notation. For instance, the function f(n) = 5n + 3 is O(n), as it can be shown that 5n + 3 ≤ 8n for all n ≥ 1, with c = 8 and n₀ = 1.
Growth Rate Analysis and Asymptotic Analysis
The function f(n) = 5n + 3 is O(n) , meaning it has a linear growth rate. This can be shown by finding constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≤ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀, where g(n) = n is a linear function.
One way to find suitable values for c and n₀ is to observe that 5n + 3 ≤ 8n for all n ≥ 1 , since 5 + 3 ≤ 8. Therefore, we can set c = 8 and n₀ = 1 , and the proof would work.
The function f(n) = 5n² + 3n log n + 2n + 5 is O(n²) , meaning it has a quadratic growth rate. This can be shown by finding constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≤ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀, where g(n) = n² is a quadratic function.
One way to find suitable values for c and n₀ is to observe that 5n² + 3n log n + 2n + 5 ≤ 15n² for all n ≥ 1 , since 5 + 3 + 2 + 5 ≤ 15. Therefore, we can set c = 15 and n₀ = 1 , and the proof would work.
The function f(n) = 20n³ + 10n log n + 5 is O(n³) , meaning it has a cubic growth rate. This can be shown by finding constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≤ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀, where g(n) = n³ is a cubic function.
The function f(n) = 5n⁴ + 3n³ + 2n² + 4n + 1 is O(n⁴) , meaning it has a 4th degree polynomial growth rate. This can be shown by finding constants c and n₀ such that f(n) ≤ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀, where g(n) = n⁴ is a 4th degree polynomial function.