Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Analysis of Six Free Anti-Phishing Software Tools: Detection Rates and Best Performers, Slides of Software Engineering

An overview of phishing, its prevalence, and the motivation behind testing six free anti-phishing software tools. The research includes an experiment from 'why phishing works', testing 500 legit/phishing sites using avg, ie smartguard, netcraft, comodo verification engine, spoofstick, and mcafee siteadvisor. The analysis reveals the best tool for each category based on the greatest percentage of legit sites verified and the least percentage of false negatives.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/26/2013

sharad_984
sharad_984 🇮🇳

4.5

(13)

146 documents

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Anti-Phishing Software
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Analysis of Six Free Anti-Phishing Software Tools: Detection Rates and Best Performers and more Slides Software Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

Anti-Phishing Software

Overview

  1. Background
  2. Research
  3. Motivation
  4. Our Project Outline
  5. Raw Data + Calculations
  6. Analysis of our work
  7. Conclusions
  8. Future Work
  9. Reference

Research

Looked at an experiment from the article "Why Phishing Works"

  • 22 participants
  • 7 legit sites, 9 already known phishing, 3 newly phishing
  • Purpose of experiment explained to everyone
  • 90% of users fooled by well designed phishing
  • Results: o Browser alerts = ineffective o Pop ups about fraud = inefficient o 25% not familiar with anti-phishing software o age, sex, experience, hours on comp, highest level of education = no advantages

Motivation

  • #1 misjudged phishing site was said to be legit "based on content of the page and detail in design."
  • From Jan 1- June 30 2009 there were over 55,000 phishing attacks according to the Anti-Phishing Working Group
  • We realize that we can't rely on users alone to distinguish between phishing and legitimate sites
  • People don't realize how much profit can come from a convincing phishing site

Raw Data + Calculations

  • Initial Results Spreadsheet
  • Example Analysis on SpoofStick taken from banking category o

Analysis of Results

  • None of the 6 tools showed any signs of false positives (saying it's a phishing site but it is not)
  • How we decided on best tool for each category: o greatest % verifying legit sites (not including unsure) o least % of false negatives
  • Best tool by category: o Banking: NetCraft - all legit verified, 8% false negative, 131 sites o E-commerce: NetCraft - all legit verified, 2% false negative

Analysis of Results

  • Social Networking: NetCraft or McAfee

SiteAdvisor - out of 92 sites (54 phishing, 38 legit)

  • still ~ 10 phishing not detected
  • Messenger: NetCraft or McAfee SiteAdvisor - only

8 sites analyzed, both came back with 1 false

negative

  • Other: NetCraft - 20 sites, 1 false positive

Future Work

  • We would like to have a more extensive legit/phishing spreadsheet of sites
  • We would like to continue to add the latest phishing sites reported by users on phishtank.com
  • We would like to test the following three tools: o Microsoft Anti-Phishing Filter Add-in o SpoofGuard o CallingID Toolbar