Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Battle of Gate Fulford: Harald Hardrada and the Norman Conquest of England, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

An account of the battle of gate fulford, which took place in 1066 during the norman conquest of england. The battle saw harald hardrada, the viking king of norway, and his ally tostig godwinson, the exiled english earl, face off against king harold godwinson and william of normandy. The reasons for hardrada's victory, including the failure of william's archers and the spread of rumors of william's death. It also discusses how william established control after his victory, including the building of castles and the rewarding of his norman followers.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

raimond
raimond 🇬🇧

4.8

(8)

216 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088
Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest
Anglo-Saxon society
The social system At the bottom of the hierarchy were slaves (around 10% of population). Slaves could be bought and sold and were treated as
property. Next were peasant farmers, who rented small farms. Some of their produce they had to give to their local lord (if
they didn’t, they could have their right to use the land taken away). Some peasants were called ceorls and they were those
who could go and work for a different lord if they wanted to. Then came thegns, who were local lords and lived in a manor
house and were the aristocracy and warrior class. Then came the earls who were the most important men in the country
after the King.
Changing social
status
Your position in Anglo-Saxon society co uld change. For example, if a peasant did well, obtained five ‘hides’ of land a nd paid a
tax, they could become a thegn. Slaves co uld be freed by their masters, and peasants could sell themselves into slavery if
they were particularly desperate.
Powers of the King In 1066, the King was Edward the Confessor, the most powerful man in the country. He had a number of powers s uch as law-
making, controlling production of money, military power and taxation. The people were expected to obey the law and use
the king’s coins and land owners were expected to pay taxes and provide and equip fighters for the army.
King Edward, despite not being a warrior King, was a respected law-maker and pious (religious) which helped him
Limits to the
King’s power
1- The Danelaw (see key terms). They accepted Edward’s rule but wanted to be ruled by local men and to follow own laws
2 Earl Godwin of Wessex. Godwin, though his land and thegns, was as wealthy and powerful as the King. This led to
tensions. For example, Godwin had been ordered by Edward to punish the people of Dover but Godwin refused. Edward,
with help from two other important earls, forced Godwin into exile. He returned the next year (1051) with a fleet and an
army and asked to have his earldom restored. Edward was forced to agree.
The Witan A council of important aristocrats (earls and archbishops) who advised the King. It discussed possible threats from foreign
powers, religious affairs and land disputes and how to settle them. It also played an important role in deciding who next king
would be
Earldoms Created by King Cnut in 1015, the Earldoms were c rucial to running the country. They were given many powers of the king.
For example:
Economic - Collecting taxes (they received a third of all the taxes they collected)
Legal - Overseeing justice and legal punishments in their earldom (though they couldn’t make new laws)
Military power - they were lords to hundreds of thegns and also maintained an elite bodyguard of professional soldiers
called generals.
Their power was in part dependent on the power of the king. For example, under Cnut, obedience was expected. Under
Edward, however, resistance was frequent.
Local government Earldoms were s plit into shires which had social, political, economic and military functions. Social: own court to try c ases and
give punishments. Political: Shire reeve who was the King’s representative, collected revenues, taxes and fines. Economic:
through the burh. Military: each shire had to provide troops for the fyrd (army and fleet).
Economy England was very wealthy with well-organised farming and land that was easy to farm (e.g. over 6000 mills for grinding grain
into flour). Silver coins used which were valuable and bought from Germany. England must have had enough to sell to
Germany in exchange for the silver.
Religion Anglo-Saxon society was highly religious. The Church was highly influential because people thought that they would be be
punished in the after-life if they did not live a religious life. King Edward believed he was an agent of God.
Key terms
Anglo-Saxons People who had settled in England after the R omans left Britain. They
came from different parts of what is now Germany, Belgium and the
Netherlands
Aristocracy The people in society who are seen as being more important because
of their wealth and power, which they have of ten inherited from their
parents and ancestors
Ceorls ’Free’ peasant farmers not tied to their land
Earls Highest in Anglo-Saxon aristocracy. The word came from the Danish
‘jarl’ who were chiefs who ruled a region on behalf of the King.
Danelaw The part of England where Danish (Viking) power had been strongest
and which had kept some of its Danish laws instead o f Anglo-Saxon
ones.
Fyrd The men of the Anglo-Saxon army and fleet. Every five hides provided
one man for the fyrd
Shire reeves (or
sheriff)
Were the king’s local government officials and they worked within the
earldoms to look after the king’s interests and carry out his
instructions
Burh Fortified [protected] towns, where all trade over a certain amount
had to take place (to ensure tax was paid)
Geld tax A tax on land, originally to pay off the Vikings (Danegald). It went to
the king
Wergild To stop blood feuds, this was money paid directly to a victim’s family
as a punishment. Archbishops worth 3,600 shillings, ceo rl worth 20
shillings.
Hue and cry Everyone’s responsibility to catch a criminal
Coronation Ceremony where a king is crowned
Rising against Earl Tostig
Background
and causes
Tostig Godwinson, brother of Harold Go dwinson, was Earl of Northumbria (large Northern Earldom). It was part of the Danelaw.
Causes included: high taxation, Tostig being a southerner, Tostig o rdering assassinations of rivals and not defending Northumbria
against Scottish attacks.
Response Harold blamed Tostig and Tostig claimed that the rebellion was actually against Edward. Edward commanded an army to be raised
against the rising but his command was not obeyed. Edward had to back down and accept the rebel’s demands so he put Morcar
in as Earl of Northumbria.
Significance Shows how the power of the king could be challenged if the king was weak and it was in the interests of the major Earls to work
together
Rival claimants for the throne
Harold
Godwinson
(c1022-1066)
Said he should be King as he was Edward’s brother-in-law and claimed
Edward promised him the throne. Had support from earls and thegns,
and was the wealthiest and most powerful man in England. He was
chosen by the Witan and his coronation took place on the day Edward
was buried, January 6th, 1066.
Edgar Aethling
(c1051-c1126)
Directly descended from King Edward (his nephew). Teenager when
King Edward died and people thought that England was about to be
attacked by Scandinavia and Normandy and felt it would be too risky
Harald
Hardrada
(1015-1066)
King of Norway and Viking warrior. Known as ‘Hard Ruler’ [Hardrada].
Claimed that the Viking King of England, King Cnut (1016-1035), had
made a secret deal which would put him o n the throne. Tostig
Godwinson supported the viking against his own brother
William of
Normandy
(c1028-1087)
Duke of Normandy and claimed that Edward had promised him the
throne, which was then confirmed after Harold’s embassry to
Normandy in 1064. Supported by the Pope.
Battle of Gate Fulford (20th September)
Who was
involved?
-Hardrada’s fleet (200-300 ships carrying about
9000 Vikings)
-Morcar and elder brother Edwin, and M ercia
What happened? Crushing defeat for Edwin and Morcar. Took
place at Gate Fulford, outside York as Edwin
and Morcar decided on open battle
Why did Hardrada
win?
-Outnumbered (probably 6000 to about 9000)
-Hardrada and his housecarls were better
prepared and tactically smarter (e.g. Hardrada
left best soldiers to attack from side)
-Edwin and Morcar stationed their army with
marshland to their backs. They had nowhere to
go
Battle of Stamford Bridge (25th September)
Who was involved? Harold Godwinson, Hardrada and Tostig
What happened? Harold Godwinson learned of hostage deal
and decided to sabotage it. He was
successful. Hardrada and Tostig were killed
and only 24 of Hardrada’s longships
returned (out of over 200)
Why did Godwinson
win?
-The Viking army had left their armour on
their ships
-Harold took Hardrada and Tostig my
surprise
-Harada’s army had fought a battle five days
before
-Harold’s housecarls broke Viking shield wall
Battle of Hastings (14th October 1066)
Who was involved? -Godwinson (6-7000 men, fyrdsmen and
housecarls) and William (800 knights, 4-6000
foot soldiers)
What happened? -Harold, despite not achieving surprise, got
to the top of Caldbec Hilll
-William’s archers, foot soldiers and cavalry
fail
-Rumour spreads William has died. He takes
his helmet off to prove he’s alive.
-Normans use feigned retreat. Some of
Harold’s army chase them and get
surrounded.
-Harold, Gyrth and Leofwine remain a t the
top but become heavily outnumbered and
are killed
Why did William win? -Tactics (feigned retreat) which broke shield
wall
-William leadership (e.g. crossing channel
with horses, building castles)
-Harold’s leadership (e.g. Rushing from
north to south without waiting in London)
-Luck (Hardrada’s invasion, changing wind)
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download The Battle of Gate Fulford: Harald Hardrada and the Norman Conquest of England and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060- 1088

Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest

Anglo-Saxon society

The social system At the bottom^ of the hierarchy were slaves (around 10% of population). Slaves could be bought and sold and were treated as

property. Next were peasant farmers, who rented small farms. Some of their produce they had to give to their local lord (if they didn’t, they could have their right to use the land taken away). Some peasants were called ceorls and they were those who could go and work for a different lord if they wanted to. Then came thegns, who were local lords and lived in a manor house and were the aristocracy and warrior class. Then came the earls who were the most important men in the country after the King.

Changing social

status

Your position in Anglo-Saxon society could change. For example, if a peasant did well, obtained five ‘hides’ of land and paid a tax, they could become a thegn. Slaves could be freed by their masters, and peasants could sell themselves into slavery if they were particularly desperate.

Powers of the King In 1066, the King was Edward the Confessor, the most powerful^ man in the country. He had a number of powers such as law-

making, controlling production of money, military power and taxation. The people were expected to obey the law and use the king’s coins and land owners were expected to pay taxes and provide and equip fighters for the army. King Edward, despite not being a warrior King, was a respected law-maker and pious (religious) which helped him

Limits to the

King’s power

1 - The Danelaw (see key terms). They accepted Edward’s rule but wanted to be ruled by local men and to follow own laws 2 – Earl Godwin of Wessex. Godwin, though his land and thegns, was as wealthy and powerful as the King. This led to tensions. For example, Godwin had been ordered by Edward to punish the people of Dover but Godwin refused. Edward, with help from two other important earls, forced Godwin into exile. He returned the next year (1051) with a fleet and an army and asked to have his earldom restored. Edward was forced to agree.

The Witan A council^ of important aristocrats (earls and archbishops) who advised the King. It discussed possible threats from foreign

powers, religious affairs and land disputes and how to settle them. It also played an important role in deciding who next king would be

Earldoms Created by King Cnut in 1015, the^ Earldoms were crucial to running the country. They were given many powers of the king.

For example: Economic - Collecting taxes (they received a third of all the taxes they collected) Legal - Overseeing justice and legal punishments in their earldom (though they couldn’t make new laws) Military power - they were lords to hundreds of thegns and also maintained an elite bodyguard of professional soldiers called generals. Their power was in part dependent on the power of the king. For example, under Cnut, obedience was expected. Under Edward, however, resistance was frequent.

Local government Earldoms were split into shires which had social, political,^ economic and military functions.^ Social : own court to try cases and

give punishments. Political: Shire reeve who was the King’s representative, collected revenues, taxes and fines. Economic: through the burh. Military: each shire had to provide troops for the fyrd (army and fleet).

Economy England was very^ wealthy with well-organised farming and land that was easy to farm (e.g. over 6000 mills for grinding grain

into flour). Silver coins used which were valuable and bought from Germany. England must have had enough to sell to Germany in exchange for the silver.

Religion Anglo-Saxon^ society was highly religious. The Church was highly influential because people thought that they would be be

punished in the after-life if they did not live a religious life. King Edward believed he was an agent of God.

Key terms

Anglo-Saxons People who had settled in England after the Romans left Britain. They came from different parts of what is now Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands Aristocracy The people in society who are seen as being more important because of their wealth and power, which they have often inherited from their parents and ancestors Ceorls ’Free’ peasant farmers not tied to their land Earls Highest in Anglo-Saxon aristocracy. The word came from the Danish ‘jarl’ who were chiefs who ruled a region on behalf of the King. Danelaw The part of England where Danish (Viking) power had been strongest and which had kept some of its Danish laws instead of Anglo-Saxon ones. Fyrd The men of the Anglo-Saxon army and fleet. Every five hides provided one man for the fyrd Shire reeves (or sheriff) Were the king’s local government officials and they worked within the earldoms to look after the king’s interests and carry out his instructions Burh Fortified [protected] towns, where all trade over a certain amount had to take place (to ensure tax was paid) Geld tax A tax on land, originally to pay off the Vikings (Danegald). It went to the king Wergild To stop blood feuds, this was money paid directly to a victim’s family as a punishment. Archbishops worth 3,600 shillings, ceorl worth 20 shillings. Hue and cry Everyone’s responsibility to catch a criminal Coronation Ceremony where a king is crowned

Rising against Earl Tostig

Background

and causes

Tostig Godwinson, brother of Harold Godwinson, was Earl of Northumbria (large Northern Earldom). It was part of the Danelaw. Causes included: high taxation, Tostig being a southerner, Tostig ordering assassinations of rivals and not defending Northumbria against Scottish attacks.

Response Harold blamed^ Tostig^ and^ Tostig^ claimed that the rebellion was actually against Edward. Edward commanded an army to be raised

against the rising but his command was not obeyed. Edward had to back down and accept the rebel’s demands so he put Morcar in as Earl of Northumbria.

Significance Shows how the power of the king could be challenged if the king was weak and it was in the interests of the major Earls to work

together

Rival claimants for the throne

Harold

Godwinson

(c1022-1066)

Said he should be King as he was Edward’s brother-in-law and claimed Edward promised him the throne. Had support from earls and thegns, and was the wealthiest and most powerful man in England. He was chosen by the Witan and his coronation took place on the day Edward was buried, January 6th, 1066.

Edgar Aethling

(c1051-c1126)

Directly descended from King Edward (his nephew). Teenager when King Edward died and people thought that England was about to be attacked by Scandinavia and Normandy and felt it would be too risky

Harald

Hardrada

King of Norway and Viking warrior. Known as ‘Hard Ruler’ [Hardrada]. Claimed that the Viking King of England, King Cnut (1016-1035), had made a secret deal which would put him on the throne. Tostig Godwinson supported the viking against his own brother

William of

Normandy

(c1028-1087)

Duke of Normandy and claimed that Edward had promised him the throne, which was then confirmed after Harold’s embassry to Normandy in 1064. Supported by the Pope.

Battle of Gate Fulford (20th^ September)

Who was involved?

  • Hardrada’s fleet (200-300 ships carrying about 9000 Vikings)
  • Morcar and elder brother Edwin, and Mercia What happened? Crushing defeat for Edwin and Morcar. Took place at Gate Fulford, outside York as Edwin and Morcar decided on open battle Why did Hardrada win?
  • Outnumbered (probably 6000 to about 9000)
  • Hardrada and his housecarls were better prepared and tactically smarter (e.g. Hardrada left best soldiers to attack from side)
  • Edwin and Morcar stationed their army with marshland to their backs. They had nowhere to go

Battle of Stamford Bridge (25th^ September)

Who was involved? Harold Godwinson, Hardrada and Tostig What happened? Harold Godwinson learned of hostage deal and decided to sabotage it. He was successful. Hardrada and Tostig were killed and only 24 of Hardrada’s longships returned (out of over 200) Why did Godwinson win?

  • The Viking army had left their armour on their ships
  • Harold took Hardrada and Tostig my surprise
  • Harada’s army had fought a battle five days before
  • Harold’s housecarls broke Viking shield wall

Battle of Hastings (14th^ October 1066)

Who was involved? - Godwinson (6- 7000 men, fyrdsmen and housecarls) and William (800 knights, 4- 6000 foot soldiers) What happened? - Harold, despite not achieving surprise, got to the top of Caldbec Hilll

  • William’s archers, foot soldiers and cavalry fail
  • Rumour spreads William has died. He takes his helmet off to prove he’s alive.
  • Normans use feigned retreat. Some of Harold’s army chase them and get surrounded.
  • Harold, Gyrth and Leofwine remain at the top but become heavily outnumbered and are killed Why did William win? - Tactics (feigned retreat) which broke shield wall
  • William leadership (e.g. crossing channel with horses, building castles)
  • Harold’s leadership (e.g. Rushing from north to south without waiting in London)
  • Luck (Hardrada’s invasion, changing wind)

Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060- 1088

William I in power: securing the kingdom

How did William establish control

Edgar Aethling After William’s victory,^ the Witan elected Edgar^ Aethling^ as King. Earls Edwin and^ Morcar^ and Archbishop of Canterbury

(Stigand) and Archbishop of York (Ealdred) supported him.

March on London The^ Anglo-Saxons didn’t attack William when he was at Dover. Instead, they waited in London. William therefore had to

march on London to force their submission. On the way, the Normans destroyed homes and farms with these towns surrendering. However, London was a fortified [protected] and did not surrender and therefore William went to Berkhamstead.

Submission at

Berkhamstead

When William reached Berkhamstead, he was met by Edgar Aethling, Archbishop Ealdred, Edwin and Morcar. They submitted to William, gave him the crown, swore oaths to obey him and gave him hostages to guarantee their promises

Marcher Earldoms Wales^ had been a threat to Edward the Confessor’s rule and William wanted the border between England and Wales to be

more secure. He set up the marcher earldoms centred on Hereford, Shrewsbury and Chester. These were different to other earldoms as they were smaller, exempted from tax and had the right to build castles. This was to ensure they were easier to control and defend.

Motte and Bailey

Castles

An estimated 500 castles were build during William’s reign. They were built in strategic locations (e.g. near river crossings), used to dominate territory and were a symbol of Norman power. Key features of the motte and bailey castles included access into the castle being controlled through a gatehouse and sometimes a draw bridge, a strong wooden tower called the keep as a lookout point and the motte being a mound of earth which was fire proof. In rebellious areas, they were placed at 32 km intervals as Norman troops could travel that far in a day and therefore deal with unrest quickly.

Difference

between castles

and burhs

  • Burhs were public, castles were private
  • Burhs were big and enclosed the whole town, castles were small and easy to defend
  • Burhs were difficult to get into but easy to set on fire, motte and bailey castles were better protected
  • Burhs had been to protect Anglo-Saxons, castles were used to control them

Rewarding loyalty William needed^ to reward his own Norman followers such as the mercenaries that he promised money. To reward them, he:

  • Sent rich gifts to the pope and church
  • Set a geld tax on Anglo-Saxons
  • Declared that as King, all land belonged to him
  • Gave his half-brother, Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, all of Kent
  • Gave William FitzOsbern the Isle of Wight, Hampshire and much of the west
  • Gave Robert of Montgomery Essex and Sussex (and was regent when King William was away)

Key terms

Submission Formal acceptance of and surrender to authority Geld tax March Anglo-Saxon term for border Motte The mound of earth the castle stood on Bailey Outer part of the castle, surrounding the motte and protected by a fence or wall Castellan The governor of a castle and its surrounding lands (castlery); its lord or a steward of the local lord Guerrilla Warfare When small bands attack a larger force by surprise and then disappear back into local population Genocide Deliberate attempt to murder an entire group of people Tenants-in- chief Large landholders of Norman England who held their land directly from the king. Forfeit To lose something as punishment Vassal Someone who held their land in exchange for services to their Norman lord

Revolt of Edwin and Morcar in 1068

Causes - Edwin’s resentment over William’s broken promise he would

marry William’s daughter

  • Bad government (Odo and Willlitam FitzOsbern’s illegal land grabs and allowing their soldiers to rape Anglo-Saxon women)
  • Morcar’s resentment oover his earldom being reduced
  • Geld tax

Events 1068: Edwin &^ Morcar^ flee from William’s court. They revolt

supported by Edgar, Waltheof and Gospatric. William took his forces north and build castles as they went. He takes control of Warwick and Nottingham and Edwin and Morcar surrender. York sends citizens as hostages to show obedience. Morcar flees to Scotland, others beg for mercy.

Failure Failed because: rebels were divided, castles were successful,

the rebellion may have just been a ‘test’ to see response Outcomes included: Edgar going to Scotland meant it became a new centre of rebellion against William,, Edwin and Morcar were kept as ‘guests’ in William’s court to control them

Edgar and rebellions in the North, 1069

Causes - After Gospatric betrayed William in revolt of Edwin and Morcar he replaced him with loyal supporter, Robert Cumin who attacked northern towns and villages

  • Anglo-Saxons got revenge and slaughtered Cumin’s men in Durham and killed Cumin
  • This triggered other uprisings and Edgar’s return Events - Edgar and his supporters came down from Scotland and attacked a Norman sheriff and his garrison (soldiers)
  • William responded by couting the rebels with the whole city of York lade to waste
  • Edgar escaped back to Scotland
  • A new castle was built with FitzOsbern as its castellan and William returned to Winchester for Easter

Anglo-Danish attack

Events In 1069, King Sweyn of Denmark assembled a fleet which arrived on the English coast in September. They met with Edgar’s troops and attacked York on the 21st^ September. 3000 Normans were killed, both castles were destroyed and all the plunder was carried back to Danish fleet. After victory in York, the Danes sailed down the Humber to Lincolnshire (difficult to access by land because of swamps and difficult to attack by sea as Viking ‘navy’ were stronger). Anglo-Saxon rebels used guerrilla warfare tactics. William’s response

  • He paid the Danes a large mount of money to leave
  • Embarked upon ‘Harrying of the North’

Hereward the Wake and rebellion at Ely (1070-

E v e n t s In 1070, King Sweyn and a Danish fleet returned. They went to the Isle of Ely (marshland and part of Danelaw). He was joined by Hereward, a local thegn who had been exiled by Edward but returned in 1069 to find his land given to a Norman. He was fighting a guerrilla war against the Normans. The Danes and Hereward raided Peterborough Abbey together. However, the Danes just took the treasure and went back to Denmark with it. Morcar joined Hereward to defend the Isle of Ely William, possibly through bribing local monks, was able to find a safe way through the marshes. Hereward escaped, Morcar was imprisoned for the rest of his life, and Edwin was dead by 1071.

Harrying of the North

Causes - Killing of Robert Cumin

  • Failure to stop guerrilla tactics
  • Refusal of north to accept William
  • Danelaw areas encouraged Danish invasion Immediate impact
  • Estimated 100,000 people died
  • Crops and seeds destroyed leading to starvation
  • Homes destroyed leading to people freezing to death
  • Mass migration of people to other places
  • Reports of cannibalism Long-term impact
  • No further uprisings in Northumbria
  • Domesday Book: Yorkshire: 60 per cent waste
  • Many Anglo-Danes killed meaning north no longer a suitable place for Danish invasion
  • Key turning point as William now wanted to replace Anglo-Saxon aristocracy rather than win them over

Landownership

Landhold ers Normans replaced Anglo-Saxons as major landholders. Over half of all land was owned by 190 tenants-in-chief. Only two were Anglo-Saxon. Anglo-Saxons lost their land in three ways:

  • Forfeit (see key terms)
  • New earldoms (e.g. marcher ealrdoms)
  • Illegal land grabs Land ownershi p Anglo-Saxon landownership: - bookland (lords given to followers in exchange for charter (document). This could be passed on
  • Leases: land loaned for set amount of time Norman landownership: - all land owned by king, - Anglo-Saxons had to pay King for their land, Normans did not, - tenants-in-chief could re-allocate land when thegn died to ensure loyalty

Revolt of the Earls, 1075

Conspirato rs Ralph de Gael (Norman), Roger de Breteuil (Norman and son of FitzOsbern), Waltheof (Saxon) Causes Resentments included loss of land (e.g. Roger after FitzOsbern’s death), privileges and power. Opportunities included William’s absence, powerful allies (Danish), and Anglo-Saxon rebelliousness. Events Ralph married Emma, Roger’s sister. Here they plotted against William. It failed because Lanfranc (regent while William was away) excommunicated (cut off) Roger from the Church, Normans and Anglo-Saxons worked together against the rebels and the 200 Danish ships arrived too late. Defeat Ralph escaped to Brittany, Waltheof fled abroad until William tricked him into thinking he could return where he was imprisoned and later executed and Roger was imprisoned for life

Royal power

Oaths Public declarations of loyalty (e.g. before possible Viking invasion in 1086) Successor William emphasised his right to be king through relation to Edward Ceremonies Christian ceremonies to emphasise royal power (e.g. Easter