Ratio Analysis of Sarveshwar, LT Foods, Chaman Lal Setia, KRBL, Assignments of Finance

Download Ratio Analysis of Sarveshwar, LT Foods, Chaman Lal Setia, KRBL and more Assignments Finance in PDF only on Docsity!

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS

COMPETITORS IN

SHARE MARKET WITH

SARVESHWAR

SUBMITTED BY

RADHAY MAHAJAN

SARVESHWAR FOODS LTD.

Market Cap (Rs Cr.) 5,996.

P/E 10.

Book Value (Rs) 132.

Dividend (%) 280.

Market Lot 1

Industry P/E 10.

EPS (TTM) 23.

P/C 9.

Price/Book 1.

Dividend Yield.(%) 1.

Face Value (RS) 1.

Deliverables (%) 32.

1,373.

1

1600

LT FOODS

SARVESHWAR

1

CHAMAN LAL

SETIA

EXPORTS

BASIC ANALYSIS AND

COMPARISON

KRBL

SARVESHWAR DETAILED

RATIO ANALYSIS

Rs in Cr.)

31-Mar-19 31-Mar-

PER SHARE RATIOS

Adjusted EPS (Rs.) 3.73 4.

Adjusted Cash EPS (Rs.) 4.06 4.

Reported EPS (Rs.) 3.73 4.

Reported Cash EPS (Rs.) 4.06 4.

Dividend Per Share 0 0

Operating Profit Per Share

(Rs.) 6.55 8.

31-Mar-19 31-Mar-

Book Value (Incl Rev Res) Per

Share (Rs.) 46.65 43.

Net Operating Income Per

Share (Rs.) 93.76 88.

Free Reserves Per Share (Rs.) 0 0

PROFITABILITY RATIO

Operating Margin (%) 6.98 9.

Adjusted Cash Margin (%) 4.28 5.

Adjusted Return On Net Worth

Reported Return On Net Worth

Return On long Term Funds

PAYOUT RATIOS 31-MARCH -19 31-MARCH-

Dividend payout Ratio (Net

Profit) 0 0

Dividend payout Ratio

(Cash Profit) 0 0

Earning Retention Ratio 100 100

Cash Earnings Retention

Ratio 100 100

COVERAGE RATIOS

Adjusted Cash Flow Time

Total Debt 8.65 5.

Financial Charges

Coverage Ratio 3.91 3.

Fin. Charges Cov.Ratio

(Post Tax) 3.12 2.

Weaknesses

• Inefficient use of capital to generate profits - RoCE declining in

the last 2 years

• Inefficient use of shareholder funds - ROE declining in the last 2

years

• Inefficient use of assets to generate profits - ROA declining in

the last 2 years

• Poor cash generated from core business - Declining Cash Flow

from Operations for last 2 years

• Low Piotroski Score : Companies with weak financials
• Declining Net Cash Flow : Companies not able to generate net

cash

Threats

Competitors are

gaining the

competitive advantage

.

Strength

s

Company

with Zero

Promoter

Pledge

Opportuniti

es

Profit making

company with High

ROCE and Low PE

companies

Increase the

promoters and

investors by

advertising the

brand.

SWOT

Analysis

SARVESHWA

R

STRENGTH



stock passes majority of CANSLIM

Investment criteria



Rising Net Cash Flow and Cash from

Operating activity



Company with high TTM EPS Growth



Growth in Net Profit with increasing

Profit Margin (QoQ)



Growth in Quarterly Net Profit with

increasing Profit Margin (YoY)



Increasing profits every quarter for the

past 4 quarters



Increasing Revenue every quarter for

the past 2 quarters



Book Value per share Improving for

last 2 years



FII / FPI or Institutions increasing

their shareholding



Near 52 Week High



Strong Momentum: Price above short,

medium and long term moving

WEAKNESS

• Companies with growing

costs YoY for long term

projects

• Inefficient use of

shareholder funds - ROE

declining in the last 2

years

• Inefficient use of assets to

generate profits - ROA

declining in the last 2

years•

OPPORTUNITIES

Rising Delivery Percentage

Compared to Previous Day

and Month, Strong Volumes

• Profit making company

with High ROCE and Low PE

companies

• Highest Recovery from 52

Week Low

SW

OT

LT FOODS

Thank you